Lead Image

HERE AND THERE: Sunny mamas versus ice princesses

Print print Email email Share Share


As I write this, another female has come out of the woodwork to claim intimacy with the world’s number one golfer. This brings the tally to 14 but that is like a leisurely stroll when you compare it to basketball great,Chairman of the Board aka Wilt (the stilt) Chamberlain’s total of 20,000 women by the time he was 55; or even when you compare the notches on Mr. Wood s’ club to those of the young lady of 23 who sat next to our own Cheta Nwanze on a bus ride to New York and said she had slept with 50 men in the six years since she lost her virginity. (See Cheta’s blog Sex Education, 234next.com) But this game of numbers is not the most significant thing that has struck me out of all the hoopla about Mr. Woods and his sexual indiscretions.

Here in South Africa, over there in the United States and in our own dear motherland the suggestion has been made, even though tongue in cheek, that Woods committed his first error by marrying a white woman. He should have found himself a black one, African African, African American or African European and none of this embarrassing inconvenience would have occurred. The reason: black women don’t make a fuss about sexual fidelity, they don’t expect it and are far more, “understanding”, I think is the word.

So here is the topic for our debate today, ladies and gentlemen:

The challenge- Black Sisters are more forgiving than their White counterparts. It’s Sunny mamas versus ice princesses. Discuss.

A couple of decades ago, I set myself the task of attempting to define love in polygamous terms. I approached it with the European traditions of courtly love and romance firmly in the background. This is the tradition that dominates most romantic female notions about love the world over, most likely because it does place the woman being wooed on a pedestal. It is a settled matter that in general a Nigerian man who is seen as being too attached to his wife is a butt of ridicule, a woman wrappa. Given this one can understand the attraction of being viewed from a different perspective.

Straining to find a meaning that would elevate and distil the qualities of polygamous love I came up with this theory. A love shared is a love multiplied. The more you give, the more you get. The love you have for one woman does not in any way diminish the love you have for the other three or four.

It is a love that truly appreciates individuality. No need to take affront at the advent of another co wife. After all, it is not personal. Yours is yours, hers is hers.

Don’t look for logic. There isn’t any, even in Elin Nordegren’s culture which says a love shared is a love diluted, debased,dishonoured, and finds no redeeming quality in the concept of group sharing and caring and, does not have the imagination to conceive of the possibility that there might be some redeeming pleasures, even for women, in practicing same.

But I digress....

Logically then, the whole concept of sexual fidelity and the value accorded it in each system of marriage has to be widely variant. One might also consider Asian cultures where arranged marriages are the norm and divorce rates generally lower than in United States. Affection is expected to grow between the couple blossoming possibly into something more passionate at a later stage. The conclusion surely is that love takes many forms, travels different roads to reach its destination. This is so even when that journey can be traced back through European history to its origins there as an institution that was conceived as a proper vehicle for the transfer of property and the perpetuation of wealth among the landed gentry. This is a corollary, perhaps, of the many wives, lots of farmhands’ version of the origins of polygamy.

But I digress again,having meandered down this much beaten path of tracing where love ends and money begins. I must say that a number of Nollywood movies I have watched, do a convincing job of explaining how love and money work. In Hollywood, as in Elin Nordegren’s case, according to news reports from America, a decision to end her marriage to Tiger Woods will be the beginning of a very financially comfortable life, based on what Woods will have to “settle” her with according to the terms of the prenuptial contract and the divorce laws of whichever state she decides to sue in.

In Nollywood though,whether you sue in Lagos or Bayelsa you leave with what you came in with, if you are lucky.Divorce is not a profitable business down in the tropics for women and it is not a surefire thing that marriage is either. So how do the sisters maintain their cool without resorting to cave man tactics with a golf club?

The secret is buried deep.

And you won’t be hearing it from my lips...

Back
Dear Reader.
While we value your feedback we may block inappropriate comment. Please feel free to respond to new comments. Note also that 234NEXT bears no responsibility for what readers post and is not liable for any form of impersonation.

Reader Comments (17)


Posted by Philip Ikita on Dec 20 2009

Great theory of love: the more you give, the more shall you receive.

Posted by Babs Dodo on Dec 20 2009

This is a good one! But it is not only Tiger's wife that is asking for something big from her husband. Another ex-mistress is now asking for $2.6 million for her silence. Yeah, I agree in Nollywood, divorce is not yet seen as a profitable business. It might be difficult finding a Nigerian lawyer to file for such. May be our culture frowns at it.

Posted by TATA on Dec 20 2009

give am love potion aptly called.."listen to me"...and please "wrappa" is spelt wrapper even in pidgin...

Posted by Bolanle on Dec 20 2009

African women are not more understanding oooo. They were just silent in in the past because many of them didnt have the financial wherewithal to tell the man to go jump, but now that they can take care both of themselves and their kids, they dont hang around a serial adulterer! And NO, TATA, "wrappa" is spelt like that in pidgin because it is pronounced without the final "r"!

Posted by Ayo on Dec 20 2009

Some things are clearer said, unsaid, Amma. This goes for the secret in the tail end of the article. So, I just might know the secret; though not through personal experience, rather Bill Clintonian! But strike action or (WES) Withdrawal of Essential Services rarely works with serial adulterers, not when it has become established habit. Perhaps o.k when the disgusting partner is only starting out on the disgraceful career path.

Posted by olumide on Dec 20 2009

Divorce is profitable in the US and UK because the laws make it so. In Russia, the woman gets from what the man was worth before the wedding- See Abrahomovich. Now here's my own politically incorrect theory abt monogamy, it is an unnatural contraption that requires super human will to work. The Swan is the only species of animals (may be one more) that is monogamous. polygamy is the natural way and there are evolutionary and sociological reasons. Some reports have it that up to 80% of men in monogamous marriages are having or have had extra marital issues. I believe African women (nt even black ameicans, they have been known to burn down ur house)are just more commonsensical than their white counterparts

Posted by Dele on Dec 20 2009

@ Ayo. How about SES instead of WES. In other words, Suspension of Essential Services (SES)instead of Withdrawal of Essential Services? The former puts the erring, probably mis-led guy on probation, but the latter is rather for the patapata league. I can imagine the woman saying 'Don't touch me. You are on SES'!!!

Posted by TATA on Dec 20 2009

@bolanle..which school of pidgin did you go to...we originated the language and you wan come from lagos or ibadan wey yariba is lingua franca to argue...abeg give de man pussy juice in his soup....contact me for the right ingredients...

Posted by Ayo on Dec 20 2009

@Dele. You have my permission, wholeheartedly. But that is the easy part. The hard part is to outsmart Amma into breaking her promise! Until that happens, we'll never know if my guess was right, in the first place. Tough luck with that, mate.

Posted by Bolanle on Dec 20 2009

TATA...you are sooo full of IT!! Consider yourself on WES probation!But seriously, I know many married women who are having affairs too, having becoming sick of being ignored by their husbands and the age range of these women is 28 - 48...

Posted by TATA on Dec 20 2009

@bolanle...i am sorry dear, se ebi nu?...please lift the WES, last time you said i should be honest and straightforward, now you are upset over a trifle...wrapper is spelt "wrappa", and i would eat your igbin and keep quiet....ma bi nu..dear....

Posted by Sylvia Ofili on Dec 21 2009

All men are guilty until proven innocent. In my opinion, all men are cheaters and are cheating on their wives, girlfriends etc. Black, white, asian, I don't care. Men generally, do not have strength of character. They are weak human beings who are yet to master control over their bodies. They should be used solely for reproduction purposes. Expecting anything else will surely be a disappointment. Polygamy, monogamy, who cares? Women should just learn to accept these creatures as they are. Weak and easily excitable. Women should stop crying and pretending that they did not know what they were getting when they married. Those vows! Gosh! For a man? Anytime men recite their wedding vows, I am overcome with laughter. I still can't believe women actually expect them to honour them. What a charade! Wedding vows should simply state that the man should give the woman his sperm, finito. After all, what else can a man give you, apart from the penis?

Posted by Sade on Dec 21 2009

@ Sylvia... all men are cheats...

Posted by Tony OK on Dec 21 2009

Sylvia, women are equally guilty, if not more guilty. I've known more women justify infidelity than men even if the women would not make the move to cheat. Psychoanalyse a woman, and you'll be horrified at what you'll discover. Cheating does not come only with the use of the penis; a married woman who packs her boobs so well for other men to admire is not cheating abi? When you smile so seductively to catch attention, are you not inviting a penis? Form an all-woman community, as feminist Irigaray suggests, if you think marriage and penises don't matter.

Posted by Dele on Dec 21 2009

@ Bolanle. Thank you for your honesty. I wonder why people tend to genderise adultery. Until research evidence proves the contrary, he claim of higher incidence of adultery among (married) men as opposed to women, may just turn out to be a myth. Bolanle's anecdotal evidence clearlt supports that possibility.

Posted by sylvia ofili on Dec 22 2009

@Sade: Thanks. I am a bush girl...sometimes. @ Tony Ok : Who said marraige and penis don't matter? We need the penis for reproduction purposes...and if people feel secure (for whatever reason) doing it within marraige, then thats cool. I am just tired of people being "shocked" when stuff like this happens. The whole Tiger thing did not impress me. Clinton, Tiger, Ogborikoko, who cares? Na today men dey "enjoy" themselves? Even pastors/priests/imams/that gov wey marry Yardy pikin dey enjoy themselves, talkless of ordinary man? and then, here we have a man with enough MONEY...wharahell? I expected nothing less. This is the real world and people (men/women) with strong characters are hard to find. Now I have a plane to catch. Happy Christmas and a very Merry New year to all!

Posted by Dele on Dec 22 2009

@Sylvia Ofili. See if I can catch up with you with my Christmas present:Now that you know of SES and WES probations, put the erring guys on either as appropriate. They should not be encouraged into thinking that they can always leave their penises behind and come back to pick them at their own pleasure or leisure. But, it takes a woman to make a man break his marriage vows o, you must know?



post a comment

Your name: *



* = Required information