Lead Image

The debt we owe our children

Print print Email email Share Share


There’s an old saying that while success has many fathers, failure is an orphan.

As soon as a child develops a cognitive mind, his parents begin to impress it on him or her, through subtle reinforcement, that in life, winning is everything, or like some would say-the only thing. While it’s not wrong to instill the desire to win in children, parents must be careful lest their children grow to perceive the world as battle theatre where victory must be secured by hook or crook.

In his famous letter to his son’s teacher, Abraham Lincoln sought to correct this mindset; he emphasized the eminence of fairness over victory; “Teach him to learn how to gracefully lose, and enjoy winning when he does win…10 Cents earned is of far more value than a dollar found…it is far more honourable to fail than to cheat.” he wrote; he also entreated the teacher to teach his son “that there can be glory in failure and despair in success

However, in our world today, it will be easier to find a virgin in a maternity ward than find people that will take the Lincoln road. Impelled by the overpowering desire to win, people do not hesitate to bend rules and aim below the belt. Recently, an incredibly brazen deployment of a win-by-all-means tactic confounded football lovers across the globe.

The incident played out in a recent World Cup qualification match between France and The Republic of Ireland. The game went into extra time and in the 103rd minute of the allotted time, the desperation of the French found expression. Henry Thierry, a French striker, controlled the ball twice with his hand before crossing to William Gallas who netted the ball. The goal put France past Ireland by 2-1.

Perhaps, the Irish would have been consolable if they were schemed out through a clandestine manipulation; unfortunately, they weren’t. They were robbed in broad daylight, or perhaps broad floodlight and in the range of scores of camera lenses. Their reaction was volcanic; Irish authorities denounced the outcome and clamoured for a rematch and outraged Irish fans launched a stinging attack against Thierry Henry.

While the blaze raged, some French officials made unpersuasive attempts at explaining away the incident. The protagonist, Thierry Henry reminded his questioners that he wasn’t the match referee (He later apologised and joined in the call for a rematch) while the coach of the French side, Raymond Domenech, called their victory a miracle and claimed he didn’t see the incident.

Obviously, Thierry Henry, Raymond Domenech and other French officials of their ilk, were fixated on the World Cup ticket. Their utterances demonstrated that to these French citizens, playing in the 2010 World Cup was a feat that must be achieved by fair or foul means.

But another group of French citizens thought differently, the group was the association of French sports teachers-SNEP-FSU. They roundly condemned Henry Thierry Henry’s action and Raymond Domenech’s comments “SNEP condemns and challenges statements by coach Raymond Domenech and some of his players, saying that the main thing in sports is to win…all these comments are unfortunately linked to a ‘very modern’ philosophy stipulating that in all areas, including sports, the end justifies the means” the union said. What was even more striking about the group’s censure was the reason for their dissension. They were deeply concerned that if France cheated her way to the World Cup, then a very wrong example would have been set for French children.

While their compatriots were blinded by the allure of gold, the teachers chose to abide by the wise counsel Lincoln offered many years ago. It was so inspiring to behold adults who realise that they have an obligation to set the right kind of example for children.

Parents, guardians and other persons, who are role models to children, should always remember that their actions serve as a moral compass for their children. A parent, who comes home drunk or who pays a proxy to write an examination for a child is guilty of filicide. Parents must always teach their children that forthrightness is its own reward and emphasise the negative consequences of cheating. While celebrating success, parents should also recognise good effort and tenacious attempt

It may be hard to predict the fortune of the French team in the World Cup, but there’s no telling that win or lose, there’ll be no victory for the French. Should they win, they’ll have a tough time unstrapping the yoke of illegitimacy and if they lose, there’ll be a short supply of sympathy for them. Definitely, they’ve cheated themselves into an awfully tight corner.

For Mr. Henry, he has earned himself a lion share of the “despair in success”. The page has turned on his unblemished reputation as a quintessential sportsman. He has today become the global mascot for foul play.

I can hazard a guess as to how Abraham Lincoln would have reacted to Mr. Henry’s abracadabra - he would have shaken his head disapprovingly and reminded Mr. Henry that it is by far more honourable to wear an acquired straw hat than sport a stolen crown.

Back
Dear Reader.
While we value your feedback we may block inappropriate comment. Please feel free to respond to new comments. Note also that 234NEXT bears no responsibility for what readers post and is not liable for any form of impersonation.

Reader Comments (9)


Posted by TATA on Dec 07 2009

filicide for coming home drunk? c'mon try something more suitable as setting a bad example for a minor...

Posted by Oladipo on Dec 07 2009

Well written. Indeed, cheaters carry a life long guilt where there is conscience. Although, the French nation still have some conscientious citizens, hence the Sports Teachers' concerns, Nigeria lacks any conscience, thus in Nigeria, its a shame to speak the truth even against your people. The difficulty I have on this issue is: granted Mr. Henry could have acted at the spur of the moment, could he have asked the referee to cancel the goal right there on the pitch, and would the ref listen to him? @ Tata, do you in anyway condone or take lightly the action of an adult going home drunk to the shameful sight of their children in front of the neighbours and friends? In the Western countries, children commit suicide asa result of the shame of experience (and this will be filicide as it is driven by their father's action). Its a shame and its irresponsibility not to be able to drink sensibly.

Posted by kehinde on Dec 07 2009

The moral of the article is setting the best example for your children and coming home drunk is not so approriate an example for one's kids to follow, as the hallmark of a man is by the limits he sets.

Posted by TATA on Dec 08 2009

could you tell us what filicide means and if it was properly used and if there is no better expression that could still deliver the message? @oladipo...the issue is not if i "condone or take lightly the action of someone"...KILLING is not the appropriate word....@ kehinde.."in the western countries, children commit suicide as a result of the shame" i thought next234 was a nigerian paper....abeg if pikin for nigeria commit suicide na ogbanje be that...which kin nonsense talk be that?

Posted by Akinwotu oladapo on Dec 08 2009

The problems we have regarding this issue is our Value system, Most homes in Nigeria potray foul attidude of winning by hook or crook, which is responsible for the brain drain in the country, its now a common slogan that 'the end justifies the means'. May God help us.

Posted by xtopher DAZZY on Dec 08 2009

Dear friends, I am happy that this simple OpEd got someone's attention. Whatever your contribution you should know you have scratched a critical sore that should not be ignored for the sake of national pride and every citizien's happiness. As we complain about the ills we witness in society which adults commit, we can't deny the fact that we need to take care of the leaders of tomorrow. Truth is that at a certain age every citizen should take up the mantle of guiding the next generation for the good of all. Trouble is we don't even know we have such responsibility. This is even made worse where national leadership is frought with such acts that confound even the children. Filicide or no filicide what can leadership do (everyone above eighteen including those we elect into power) to guide the conscience of posterity if we are to improve our circumstances and stop reminiscing that yesteryears were better times. I'm trying to move the locus of the discussion to our peculiar circumstance. Let's even leave France alone. FIFA has sided with them so next time Spain has to think what move would be best next. Setting s good example for our children goes beyound home. My intention is not to deny that charity begins at home. My challenge is this; Should Daddy successfully operate different personalities at work and at home he sure would be a real 'Evil Genius' and worse than a straight crook. What is required is a macro-national strategy that guides our consceince with respect to our values and how we go about achieving the deisres of our heart. It is inate in man to desire progress in material things and smooth relationships with other humans with whom we interact. We have to answer some questions in citizenship. How do we meausure success? Who do we consider wealthy and a role model? What acts are considered smart, heroic or courageos? How do we reward or punish? In simple terms how can we deliberately redesign our today so we can touch the future we dream about. Parents are limited in dominating a childs mind in the new age because often more of a child's peer intaraction would form more of his or her make up. For me there are critical mindsets leadership should guide when it comes to nation building. This is the job description for which politicians and those we allow into office, earn the priviledge of dominating the discourse of nationhood, being in charge of Government over its citizenry and etching their names in our hearts so they become immortal.

Posted by Oladipo on Dec 08 2009

@ Dizzy: That was an intelligent comment. I have always known that Nigerians are a very intelligent people -when we want to. I've only recentloy been to Nigeria on a visit after a long time abroad. I am convinced that NIgeria will make it great and even greater than we can imagine. We only need some ingridient and thisw is not where to lay them out. However, the single most important factor for development is what is the issue here and this is why this dicourse is important. That issue is: Developing Conscientious Citizenry. The same Nigerian who will seat until told to stand on the plane to London and queue at the airport and bus-stations, are the same people who will yank off thier seatbelt as soon as the plane touch down in MM1 Lagos; and rush to get off the plane and insult one another without a guilt for every little thing. What could make us behave like this? I recently read a book which talked about "The Broken Window Theory". This si the equivaleent of the Yoruba proverb, "As you make your calabash, others will relate with it." If the environment looks orderly, people act orderly. If the environment look or feels chaotic, people will act chaotic. This is also the sence made in the book, "The Lucifer Effect - How good people turn evil." I remember Fola Adeola making a comment in August 09, "We are having fraud etc in some bank, why does it not affect all banks? It's the culture in the bank, even honest people will become corrupt if the environment condones it." Lagos is changing gradually. I grew up in Lagos and if you dare tell off soneone for throwing dirt on the street, they will insult you and even others will tell you off for not minding your business. After returning home this year, and saw how clean the streets were, I told off everyone I saw throw dirt and believe it or not, they all looked stupid and apologised. That was a confident booster for me that Nigerians can indeed be conscientious, if the environemnt is right. Let us seek to do this. And our crime will be to keep quiet when we see issues like this (The French Dilema) and not flag it up and localise it to our own developmental circumstance. @ TATA: Ok, filicide is an overkill in this article, but sometimes, we use overkill in writing to emphasis the importance of the issue. Okay?

Posted by Chris Kanu on Dec 10 2009

Karl Max and other sages view the society as having the two sides of a coin, sound morals and unethical standards. Most governments, homes and states are actually on the round edge of the coin, thus having tendencies for both sides. Now society has checks to stop such inbalances but these checks seldom do so. There were referees who could have spotted and corrected the goal, there was FIFA who could have corrected this by having a rematch, there was France who could have requested one, but everyone in life always wants to protect his/her interest. France is happy they are at the world cup, FIFA sites posterity with reference to the past, and who knows if Ireland would do otherwise if the reverse were the case. Be good to all man, take advantage of an open opportunity without offending anyone and the world might just be a better place.

Posted by Chris Kanu on Dec 10 2009

Karl Max and other sages view the society as having the two sides of a coin, sound morals and unethical standards. Most governments, homes and states are actually on the round edge of the coin, thus having tendencies for both sides. Now society has checks to stop such inbalances but these checks seldom do so. There were referees who could have spotted and corrected the goal, there was FIFA who could have corrected this by having a rematch, there was France who could have requested one, but everyone in life always wants to protect his/her interest. France is happy they are at the world cup, FIFA sites posterity with reference to the past, and who knows if Ireland would do otherwise if the reverse were the case. Be good to all man, take advantage of an open opportunity without offending anyone and the world might just be a better place.



post a comment

Your name: *



* = Required information