Lead Image

President Paul biya of Cameroun, former un Secretary General, Kofi Annan and former nigerian President olusegun obasanjo during the signing of bakassi agreement at un headquarters. Photo: NAN

Federal lawmakers seek to review Bakassi agreement

Print print Email email Share Share


Members of the Cross River State caucus at the National Assembly are prepared to lobby their colleagues to prevail on the federal government to revisit the ceding of Bakassi peninsula to the Republic of Cameroon considering the flaws in the exchange of sovereignty of the oil-rich island, Bassey Edet Oqua, a member of the House of Representatives, representing Calabar/Odukpani, has said.

Mr. Oqua, who spoke at the weekend at the country home of the state governor, Liyel Imoke, located within the Itigidi Abi Local Government Area, said the agreement ceding the area to Cameroon, which was reached on August 14, 2008 has not benefitted Nigeria.

He also said the time has come for the issue to be revisited in the interest of the displaced persons and the entity called Nigeria.

"Since loopholes have been discovered in the agreement that surrendered Bakassi to Cameroon, the caucus will use this year to lobby other members of the National Assembly to take a second look at the ceding," he said.

No ratification

He blamed the former president, Olusegun Obasanjo for committing the error of accepting the judgment of the International Court of Justice on the matter. He said that, as long as the National Assembly did not ratify the court's judgement on Bakassi, the agreement is null and void.

Mr. Oqua, who is the House committee chairman on petroleum, said it is surprising that it is only Nigeria that respects that agreement whereas Cameroon, through its security agencies, has de-humanised and harassed Nigerians settling in the area - thereby creating another refugee problem in the country.

Back
Dear Reader.
While we value your feedback we may block inappropriate comment. Please feel free to respond to new comments. Note also that 234NEXT bears no responsibility for what readers post and is not liable for any form of impersonation.

Reader Comments (9)


Posted by TATA 1 on Jan 05 2010

what exactly do you want the house to do?

Posted by CHELSEA 200 on Jan 05 2010

is now that House want to know what really happened? why did they called Cameroun ealier on and discuss issues, then make it 60 - 40 per cent sharing formular ... did they know the advantage b4? and they implications ...

Posted by Cockcrow on Jan 05 2010

Where were they when OBJ went on rampage. They were too scared to dare him. Now that the cat is gone, the rat is trying to play king. Yeye people

Posted by CatChampion on Jan 05 2010

Let us use our constitution against the Cameroun and bring Cameroun to book.

Posted by Ojulari Abdulkabir Tola on Jan 05 2010

Let's not play immaturity to this serious issue. Our government is like a family house where everyone claims to have a role. Obasanjo hurt most of us because of his selfish interests, he was not considerate enough and his mission to blindly surrender the Bakassi to gain his mutual agreement with his associates. He was advised by his associates to do that to gain the respect and internation recognitions. @ Cockcrow, no one is afraid of Obasanjo. He was so autocratic in decision and selfish.

Posted by joe texas on Jan 05 2010

has the constitution been amended to reflect the loss of that local government area? there is always a price for unconstitutionality or selective adherence to the constitution.

Posted by UD on Jan 05 2010

See wht OBJ did 2 deserve N2BN anualy as as an ex-president. may he never knw peace till he repents of his iniquities.

Posted by clement on Jan 05 2010

Is our constitution in legal document in the cameroons? I am afraid

Posted by kalu on Jan 06 2010

i saw this coming. if obasanjo was from bakasi he will not have handled this issue the way he did. obasanjo was in too much hurry to act. again how can the western world determine were boundries are in africa. it is an insult for on africa for issues like boundry dispute be determined by agreement reached germany and france. ceding of bakasi should be revoked.



post a comment

Your name: *



* = Required information