Lagos Assembly uncovers more details on Sunborn Yacht Hotel

Print print Email email Share Share


The puzzle over the non-functional Sunborn Yacht Hotel in Lagos became clearer on Tuesday when the Lagos State House of Assembly invited three commissioners to discuss the supposed landmark tourism project. The parties involved, who had been frugal with details of the purported public private partnership deal, were a bit more revealing before the House as they gave their accounts in a two-hour proceeding.

Those summoned were the Lagos State Commissioner for Tourism and Intergovernmental Relations, Tokunbo Afikuyomi, Multi-Purpose Infrastructural Development Company (MIDC), the company that facilitated the yacht deal, Diamond Capital, the financial adviser for the project, the Commissioner for Finance, Rotimi Oyekan, and the Commissioner for Economic Planning and Budget, Ben Akabueze.

All were present except Diamond Capital, who claimed through a letter it wrote to the House that the notice from the lawmakers was too short.

Is Lagos State involved?

The House wanted to know the level of involvement of the Lagos State government. The three commissioners maintained that the state government is not “financially involved” in the project.

“The Lagos State government did not expend any naira, euro, dollar or any other currency currently existing in the world today towards the acquisition of the vessel called Sunborn,” said Mr. Afikuyomi.

Both the commissioner for finance and economic planning and budget corroborated Mr. Afikuyomi’s claim, as the state government has done in previous press briefings.

Mr. Afikuyomi said the role of the state was to provide ancillary infrastructure like mooring and berthing facilities.

“The executive approval of the deal signed on January 17 specifically identified the role of each party,” he said.

Emmanuel Obire, the chief executive officer of MIDC, maintained that the state government has not spent any money on the project other than the airfare of state officials who went to inspect the vessel abroad, but argued that the government will eventually be involved by the time the vessel becomes functional.

Truth about acquisition

Mr. Obire, contrary to the widely publicised information that the MIDC initiated the deal, said it was the state government that introduced the project to him.

“We saw the project as a complementary business opportunity since we are the only company in Nigeria that owns a licence for international hotel,” he said.

Mr. Obire said his company expended over $1 million US dollars in what he called “due diligence” – a bidding procedure.

“Other private organisations presented higher bids for the yacht but Lagos was considered because of the involvement of the state government,” he said.

Mr. Obiri explained further that a consignee company, Loneseed Limited, was established to facilitate the purchase of the vessel.

By the time the vessel berthed in Lagos, Loneseed was supposed to be dissolved and a new special purpose vehicle (SPV), Lagos Yacht Limited, be formed as a joint venture between the state government and the MIDC.

According to Mr. Obire, he presented the letter of intent, signed by MIDC and Lagos State government, to Diamond Bank for a loan to finance the deal.

Diamond Bank, which management, according to Mr. Obire, had been looking for an opportunity to do business with the Lagos State government, grabbed the proposal and “introduced Diamond Capital as financial adviser that will package the project”.

However, after the vessel berthed, Diamond Capital claimed the ownership of the vessel saying “the finance was equity contribution and not a loan.”

“The project is a laudable one that can place Lagos on the world tourism map and we must not allow the greed of some people to affect it,” Mr. Obire said.

With this revelation, the members of the House became more interested in knowing the details of the contract. They requested that the ownership of Loneseed and the SPV be disclosed.

The Speaker, Adeyemi Ikuforiji, did not grant the request. “What if some of the Honourable members of this House are involved in the ownership,” he said.

But he asked all the parties to submit all the documents relating to the contract to the House.

The sitting was adjourned till Monday, October 26.

Back
Dear reader.
While we value your feedback we have to moderate them, so your comments would appear in a maximum of one hour. Please feel free to return and read through again after another user may have replied to what you have said.
Please note that 234NEXT.com bears no responsibility for what readers post, and is not liable for any form of impersonation.

Reader Comments (37)


Posted by KK on Oct 21 2009

Ben Akabueze and Fashola must not allow Tokunbo Afikuyomi to soil their hard earned reputations. He is good at talking the talk but when it comes to walking it, therein lies the problem. He forever talks big and delivers nothing. Like Dele Momodu, Afikuyomi's only credential is being a june 12 activist.a role he stumbled upon in true opportunistic fashion.

Posted by TATA on Oct 21 2009

unserious assembly

Posted by future on Oct 21 2009

why should the speaker not allow the public to know who the ownership of Loneseed and the SPV is/are...this what we saying corruption in high places..paddy-paddy govt..the tax payers need full disclosure ..why on earth is ownership of a company being kept secret? 234Next, you guys are not serious with this report (same thing you guys did with Dele Giwa's death anniversary report some few days ago) I expect you guys to do an investigation and publish who ever own the Loneseed and the SPV alongside this report..May I recommend you guys go for some training with saharareporters.com on full investigative reporting..

Posted by Dayo on Oct 21 2009

@ future, without prejudice, that SPV is not a public corporation, and as a private entity it can elect to keep its corporate information (including ownership) non-public.

Posted by Lisemo on Oct 21 2009

Gabbage-in-Gabbage-out

Posted by Akan Iwatt on Oct 21 2009

For Gods sake,if Diamond Bank has nothing to hide why will the notice to come & testify be too short? U only nid time wen ther is need to fabricate. D truth wil surely come out one day.

Posted by Naijaman on Oct 21 2009

That is the problem with our banks. Too Greedy to help Nigeria grow. I see no reason why we need the names of the owners of Lonsee and SPV or why it wasnt disclosed when requested for, since anybody can invest in any business at anytime. After all Lagos did not drop shishi for the project. I am only concerned with why the Yatch has not started operation, because like so many people that i know, " i cant wait to get on board". The obvous impendiment from this story is the issue between Diamond bank and Loneseed.

Posted by Coll1 on Oct 21 2009

I agree with Future!!234 next we need some investigative journalism. Please do not become the newspaper that just reports what other people say without trying to investigate for yourselves and tell the Nigerian public the truth. At least you should table to the lagos administrition that it is unacceptable to conceal the ownership of the SPV and demand full transparency.

Posted by Coll1 on Oct 21 2009

@ dayo, as a private corporation involved in a fraud investigation at the expense of the general public, its owners to to be exposed, how else do you investigate the case?

Posted by tatafo on Oct 21 2009

we need to know what went down here!

Posted by Lee Ming on Oct 21 2009

@ Dayo "without prjudice" so in the name of "private entity" an SPV should become an unethical vehicle and have lawmakers arranging deals for themselves? please give us a break. These guys are elected to serve the State not to go there and become owners of SPVs to enrich their pockets. If indeed, some of the members are owners of the SPV, they have no business being owners of SPV to facilitate the transaction.

Posted by Olu on Oct 21 2009

So far the disclosure at the Assembly is still on course, there is nothing still discovered to be amiss in all of these. The main issue is the seeming reluctance of Diamond to respond, that is the only missing link. For now it is too early to blame either Fashola or even Afikuyomi if all what have been said is the whole truth. There is nothing wrong of a Tourism Minisrty encouraging investors to acquire world class facility to be used in the state. There would even be nothing wrong even in part funding such acquisition once it complies with laid down rules and there is full disclosure. Meanwhile, from all the statements from all the parties, it seems Tinubu is not a major actor in this. Diamond should speak out and let know if there is anything shaddy about the deal!

Posted by Sunny on Oct 21 2009

Sun don burn Sunborn, any wahala? The thing is not government funded cashwise, wait until the veil is unveiled. May be sun go burn am to brown be4 it starts operations.

Posted by john kuzo on Oct 21 2009

Can Daimond Bank/Capital come out clean!. The last part of the puzzle

Posted by Bob Achanya on Oct 21 2009

I think this is one of the challenges of PPP as a finance model. if theb rules were clear from the out set, the roles of the various stakeholders/parties in the partnerships viz the SPV, MIDC, The Financial advisers and Lagos state government should be clear. Why should Diamond bank want to claim the Vessel? Can the ICRC be brought in to adjudicate on this? I hope this will be a good case study for sustainable PPP conduct in Nigeria. Good luck.

Posted by Ade Bolaji on Oct 21 2009

I just think it is ridiculous that the speaker of the house does not want the public to know the details of ownership of SPV. So what? if honorable members of the house are part owners. Who cares? So long as they use their money to acquire the ownership of the company.Please Speaker of Lagos State House of Assembly give me a break. You are elected officials and as such the public deserves to know what the government is doing with the masses money.

Posted by Concerned Citizen on Oct 21 2009

I'm so through with our local banks. You can't take a deal to them for financing without them wanting a stake in the deal because it happens to be a juicy one. They are so greedy they operate like the mafia. They are into every kind of business imaginable e.g. telecoms, insurance companies, IT companies, Oil&Gas, et. You name it, you'll find them in it. They want a part of everything yet they don't practice banking the way it's suppossed to be practiced. Their greed was a key factor in the present finanacial crisis facing the sector. More power to the CBN governor. All the greedy-fingered bank execs need to be flushed out of the system.

Posted by birdman on Oct 21 2009

u all still dont get it fashola has bn posing dat his gvt is clean. i know enough fashola boys who are living large. ask lirs officials and gtbank about d tax scam they're runnin...eko o ni baje but...

Posted by ola vond on Oct 21 2009

THE SPV ON DAY ONE WAS ADDRESSBAS LAGOS STATE TOURIST ATRACTOIN FOR THE MEGA CITY,WHY THE DISCUSTION BY THE HOUSE AGAIN ; LET THIER BE TRANPARENCY..............

Posted by Jorgie Porgie on Oct 21 2009

@KK, may you continue to walk and never stumble... Dele Momodu defended this topic in his column with parables instead of him to accept that Afikuyomi is not clean. I just pity Fashola... He should remove Afikuyomi otherwise he is part of the game.

Posted by Jorgie Porgie on Oct 21 2009

@KK, may you continue to walk and never stumble ala Kegites slogan. Dele Momodu defended this topic in his column with parables instead of him to accept that Afikuyomi is not clean. I just pity Fashola... He should remove Afikuyomi otherwise he is part of the game or a pack of greedy wolves.

Posted by Anthony Chiedu Ashibogu on Oct 21 2009

@Bob AchanyaCan the ICRC be brought in to adjudicate on this? - to answer your question capital NO - the ICRC is for federal govt controlled assets @dayo, coll1 and lee mong - dayo is correct as the private entity CAN ELECT to keep its ownship non -public but could in the interest of coporate social responsibilty and good corporate governance make the info public. it can also be compelled by the courts to do that. the speaker acted in the light of the above. Should it become necessary to know the owners and the share structure of loneseed, MIDC or the SPV the courts will be brought in assuming that they refuse to state it themselves.

Posted by Shariah Compliant on Oct 21 2009

Federal & state govts are always wasting money or time on projects that have little direct benefits to the citizenry in ratio to the cost of such projects. This goes down as another wasted project. I heard the cost of acquiring this hotel yacht is over N4billion and they claimed it will employ 600 people. Imagine this cost on agriculture and how much food it would have put on the table for millions of lagosians. Whether lagos state supported it financially or otherwise, the fact remains..... THEY SUPPORTED IT!

Posted by ayo on Oct 21 2009

there is more to this than exposed now, we need to get the whole financial details, who and who is involved etc. Providing logistics might not be physical cash but i tell u it can be monetised?so who says lagos state has not spent a dime? That is not true. We need more information pls Ciao

Posted by timi james on Oct 21 2009

The speaker should be prob for such a statement,that means there is corruption in the house, honestly, i've lost my respect for them

Posted by koko on Oct 21 2009

soon the yansh of the chicken shall be revealed

Posted by BIG BOSS on Oct 21 2009

Up Toks. Tokunbo for ever

Posted by RWS on Oct 21 2009

@Shariah Compliant, didn't Lagos State just recently launch yet another agricultural program (YES, in this instance)? It is it not mutually-exclusive for the state to support agriculture as well as other initiatives. After all, we all cannot be farmers.

Posted by Dayo on Oct 21 2009

@Anthony, thanks. I thought I had made it clear that my statement was of a general nature "without prejudice" to the facts of this particular case. Obviously, it this becomes a CRIMINAL matter, the SPV can be subpoenaed (or otherwise be legally compelled) to disclose the details of its ownership. Otherwise, it can either elect to volunteer such information or to keep it non-public (which could include disclosing same to the State Assembly "in camera").

Posted by Tosin on Oct 21 2009

I smell a rat. I live in London and remember watching the press conference on BEN TV. We were told that the project belonged to Lagos State and that it was going to go to Holland for refurbishemnt and upgrading before landing in Lagos - I smelt a rat. Not to our suprise we saw the Sunbeam docked on Marina when went to Lagos last Christmas without being worked on - we smelt the second rat. The third rat will soon smell as Special Purpose Vehicles are a "bankruptcy-remote entity" whose operations are limited to the acquisition and financing of specific assets. The SPV is usually a subsidiary company with an asset/liability structure and legal status that makes its obligations secure even if the parent company goes bankrupt. An SPV will have investors and directors who sign their paperwork. The deal to buy Newcastle FC fell through because they did not want to reveal who the Consortium were. If people have clean money and are truly rich they should come out in the open.....Abi?

Posted by Robert on Oct 22 2009

The transparency of the whole thing is enough to commend Fashola.

Posted by Conservative on Oct 22 2009

It's clear that the speaker is trying to protect somebody as one of the owners of Loneseed. I suspect that Afikuyomi had laundered the image of Lagos state in the process of procuring the ship. Diamond bank/Diamond capital only got involved at the mention of Lagos State as ooe of the investors. When Lagos State refused to go along with a fast one Afikuyomi try to pull, Diamond capital now wants to take ownership of the ship. They would have never dear to take over the deal if Lagos State was truely involved. Detail will come out soon.

Posted by skibochi on Oct 22 2009

@ dayo, naijaman and ashibogu i totally agree with you guys on this and very objective too, lawmakers have no say in revelation of ownership so far the populaces' money (Lagos state) is not used in the purhase. How does revelation of ownership affect the take off? Lets be objective here people and the missing puzzle is still the Diamond capital crew, till they come out to give their own side of the story, we'll still be in a pzzle and if they dont, they will be compelled by the appropriate body. In all, i like the manner in which the lagos state govt is going about it. Transparency brethren is the word

Posted by Denja Yaqub on Oct 22 2009

I don't think we should rush any conclusions. I'm sure of Tokunbo's pedigree and that gives me more curiousity. I witnessed the arrival of the exciting octopus on the high sea at Bonny Camp part of CMS/Onikan; and I honestly thought that Nigeria is now moving a giant step further in tourism development; but now........what is this again? I don't think anyone should be allowed to ruin Senator Afikuyomi's name. He's a restless patriot, and Iam proud of him.

Posted by demola on Oct 22 2009

This laudable business should not be slaughtered on the alter of greed and politics. obviously afikuyomi must have some hidden agenda in that transaction. He should be the one to be investigated.

Posted by obalola on Oct 23 2009

@Dayo: The assembly guys are surely not under any obligation to provide details of the SPV but not NEXT. NEXT is expected to have gone further to investigate and provide details of the SPV financial supporters, NEXT should not reduce their standard to that of those hungry dailies. @ Denja Yaqub, I sincerely sympathise with your naivity like I sympathised with those folks who tot Soludo can never be wrong, when ur eyes are opened u wld be shocked. Diamond Capital/Bank should come to the open field and tell us their part in all these. If our Economy could be rescued from these Nigerian Banks then we shall surely get out of the present gloom. The Banks used to be bad before Soludo but after consolidation they have turned financial monsters. God help Nigeria.

Posted by lola on Oct 23 2009

d comment of mr speaker concerning d honourable members being owners of SPV was obviously a joke and he should not be taken up on it



post a comment

Your name: *



* = Required information