Lead Image

Criticisms trail tenure limit for bank chiefs

Print print Email email Share Share


Mixed reactions have followed Tuesday’s decision by the Central Bank of Nigeria to fix a 10-year tenure limit for chief executives of banks.

Most people who spoke in Abuja and Lagos criticized the decision as “illegal”, saying it amounts to undue interference in the private investment of individuals. Others said it should be encouraged, as it would help promote corporate governance in the industry.

Calls and emails to the spokespersons for Zenith Bank Plc, UBA Plc, and Skye bank Plc, whose chief executives, Jim Ovia, Tony Elumelu and Akinsola Akinfemiwa, respectively, will be affected by the new directive were not responded to as the time of this report.

Sunny Nwosu the President, Independent Stockbrokers Association of Nigeria, said the decision was unnecessary, arguing that the CBN should concentrate its efforts on reforming the economy, which he said has failed.

“This is not a right decision at all,” Mr. Nwosu said.

“It is not necessary. These people (bank chieftains) are private entrepreneurs, who set up their investments, and as at the time they did, there was no law that they would vacate their offices after a certain period of time.

“If we are talking about free-enterprise, the question of limiting the tenure for chief executives should not be there at all.

“The decision to limit the tenure is actually going to empower anybody that wants to steal to concentrate on stealing, knowing that he has a terminal period to go.

“Besides, the decision will kill the zeal of people to invest in the establishment of banks and such institutions. Like in the civil service, government’s policy is on retirement either on attainment of 35 years in service or 60 years of age.

“Sanusi should concentrate on the reform of the banking sector that is failing. The economy has continued to go bad every day. Is it this tenure limit that would restore the failed economy?

“He should avoid making laws that would continue to be obnoxious. To my mind, it appears he is pursuing shadows and leaving the real substance of the problem,” he said.

However, none of the spokespersons for the banks whose chief executives will be affected by the July 31 deadline has said anything about the new directive.

Enforce past policies

Samuel Kolawole, the Managing Director of University Press and president of Nigerian Publishers Association said that the Central Bank would achieve more by enforcing past policies on corporate governance and best practices instead of taking it out on the long serving CEOs.

“For every CEO that takes advantage of his position, there are many that are doing a good job,” Mr. Kolawole said.

“To now lump everybody together, I do not think it is fair”.

He added that the Central Bank has not been enforcing past policies on discouraging family-owned banks or allowing a single individual to own huge shares in a bank, adding that where an individual becomes too powerful for other shareholders to control, there is bound to be abuse of power.

“The shareholders should determine the tenure. They can decide to remove him after two years if he is not performing,” he said.

On whether the exit of some CEOs will negatively affect the fortunes of the banks, he said it is not likely. “If there is any bank whose success is tied to the CEO, then that bank is in trouble.

Bismarck Rewane, the Managing Director, Financial Derivatives Company and member of the Presidential Economic Steering Committee said the problems of the Nigerian banking sector runs deeper than the tenure of CEOs.

“If that is the problem, maybe with this move, things will begin to improve.” Mr. Rewane said.

“Maybe credit will start to flow, power will stabilise and the economy will start to flow, power will stabilise and the economy will start to boom.” He said a better understanding of the situation will unfold in the days ahead.

“Let us wait until we see the official Central Bank statement and see if it is consistent with the laws that have been passed before. Right now, it will be pre-emptive to make comments,” he said.

Global practice

The Chief Executive of Pro Data Limited, Iboro Otongaran, said the decision is a departure from what obtains in other advanced economies of the world, saying: “It is downright illegality for Sanusi to say the CBN would fix a tenure for somebody who used his private resources to establish his company.” But Nona Awo, a shareholder and financial analyst said the development is a good one because some banks already have tenure limit for their managing directors.

“Contrast to what others believe, I don’t see the development as a target to remove some people in office because the directive exists in some companies. The articles of some banks like Union bank allow directors to stay three terms of three years each, some two terms of two or four years each,” Mr. Awo said.

Additional reporting by Oluwaseyi Bangudu and Daniel Osunkoya

Back
Dear Reader.
While we value your feedback we may block inappropriate comment. Please feel free to respond to new comments. Note also that 234NEXT bears no responsibility for what readers post and is not liable for any form of impersonation.

Reader Comments (42)


Posted by faz on Jan 21 2010

This is a good development, i must say

Posted by fingersgem on Jan 21 2010

Execellent news in my view. These glamourised tellers, parading themselves as bank CEO's all smell of corruption to the core. The fact that they were spared by Sanusi in the initial sanitization process, which saw the removal of the likes of Celicia, Akingbola et al makes them far from not being culpable in the stink that is the banking industry. l believe they were spared to protect some theiving criminal elements. I will suggest they bring in the EFCC to probe both Elemelu and Ovia after they are shown the door out. Good riddance!!!!!.

Posted by PONDERER on Jan 21 2010

Yes , you may push the bank MD's out under the guise of tunure expiry but dont forget to acknowledge that the MD's cuurently afftected hold significant shareholding/equity in these banks to still wield considerable influence on the banks' direction, policies, board composition and effectively daily operations. These characters set up the affected institutions and were instrumental in developing the existing corporate culture and must surely have placed their surrogates in strategic positions to still remain relevant and influential inspite of any CBN directive. Do you really think Jim Ovia will not remain a powerhouse in Zenith Bank for many years to come ???

Posted by Ekpe Uzo on Jan 21 2010

Yesterday CBN told us no more cheques above N10m. Today now bank MD limited to 10 years. Next thing they will tell us how much money we can withdraw in a week?? What is Sanusi really trying to achieve with these policies? He should rather be focusing on the macro economic and regulatory functions and leave nigerians to take care of our own business!

Posted by Bola Awe on Jan 21 2010

Before investing in a bank or any business it would be prudent to understand the statutory regulations governing that business. The CBN Act and BOFI Act are the law that govern banking. Anyone who carefully examines these laws would confirm the powers of the CBN governor in monitoring the banks and formulating policies for good corporate governance in the sector. All bank CEO's know that the banking sector is highly regulated and if they want to be CEO's for life they could have gone to invest in another business. At least no one can tell Wale Tinubu to resign after 10years.

Posted by Nabis on Jan 21 2010

We can start from here...the banks made most use of govt investment and d mechanism of the state have just spoken, lets obey!

Posted by Kenny. on Jan 21 2010

Folks what happened to the much anticipated December common year end repoerts of banks?

Posted by Alagbari on Jan 21 2010

@Ekpe Uzo...he wants to make a name for himself before his 10 years are over!

Posted by Someone on Jan 21 2010

Bola Awe, I just went through the BOFIA act, and the CBN can only decide who becomes a director in any bank, following certain rules. This is a new regulation, and a troubling one, to say. Highly troubling...

Posted by SonofJohn on Jan 21 2010

Having term limits is a good idea from the viewpoint of corporate governance. Term limits also allow fresh blood and new ideas to energise the management of an institution. But term limits also have their drawbacks. Several visionary CEOs have spent

Posted by Deji on Jan 21 2010

...and deliver us from evil...

Posted by johnkuzo on Jan 21 2010

Whao! Another decision that am sure will not go without some people shouting over the top of the roof.This decision should not come to any critical observer of the industry as surprise its actually long over due. most if not all corporate governance breach was as a result of god like bank CEO's whose indefinite tenure has wrecked havoc on the industry. They created this organization from no where yes we all agree, we also agree that they are some of the best entrepreneur we have in this nation however,the day they took the license to collect deposit they should be ready to play by the rules which they have not done some of them have actually compromised.Let all of us be aware that owners of banking institutions are not bigger than the depositors.The moment they stay in office with the CEO totally in control of the board and management you have a one man show and all one "man show" always end in a disaster. let us have employee MD's and let them watch from their proxies or appointees on the board. They will still run the banks yes but the mess they will create wont be as bad.Lets have men and women who report to someone.Bill Gates left Microsoft to Steve Ballmer and moved to other things Fola Adeola left GTbank to his parner Tayo Aderinoku, Pascal Dozie left Daimond bank to Emeka Onwunka Let Jim leave Zenith to some one, let tony leave UBA to some one.Africans would rather seat tight.check this(3rd term agenda- Obasanjo, H.Mubarak- Egypt,M Gadafi-Libya etc) If any contributor knows the MD of any bank in the west that has spent 19yrs in office kindly educate me I want to know!

Posted by Imma Okochua on Jan 21 2010

All Marxists/socialists should rally round Sanusi. The day of the revolution has arrived! Capitalism is on the cross! The state shall take from rich and redistribute to the poor. The above is what you get when you appoint a spoilt offshoot of oligarchy to national economic power. Tyranny, dictatorship and recklessness. Does the Federal government care that we shall all perish in the radical fire being lit by this Marxist?

Posted by Ugo on Jan 21 2010

This 10 year limit should be applied to all large corporations quoted on the NSE. There should also be a seperation in d role of the chairman & MD/CEO. Ovia & them other guys may have started the bank but it doesn't belong to them now, they shouldn't see it as their right to sit on top.

Posted by Prince on Jan 21 2010

9ice work sanusi..but note 1 tin, al new policies shud b put in writtin as banking law and regulation or wat ever laws involve.pls rid on

Posted by Favourite Lewis on Jan 21 2010

KUDOS TO SANUSI. If birds have learnt to fly without parching, the hunters too would have to develop new strategies to shoot them down. Current issues in Nigeria financial sector is both pathetic and non-conforming with the world business standard so we need unsual tactics. Currently in Nigeria, we dont have businessmen / investors as Bank Executives but greedy folks who would do anything to amass wealth at the expense of other stakeholders. The CBN ''unusual'' interference in this so called private sector (though they run after public funds ) is timely in order to save our Nation from chaos. Once again, KUDOS TO SANUSI.

Posted by uyii edo on Jan 21 2010

With all the noise, prior to the new generation banks and their CEO's where was CBN, I will say again Sanusi's policies are working towards destabilising the economy. Dangote does not want to owe any nigerian bank, the biggest nigerian investor.. mind you investors place their money in banks with reputed leadership, Berkshire in Omaha texas have had a CEO for over 40yrs (Warren Buffet), Great banks such as Goldman Sachs, Merryl Lynch, JP Morgan all had CEO's who retired or sold their investment when the time was right. Ovia should offload his shares in Zentih and go somewhere else, Zenith & UBA will be sold to foreign Investors and then we will know that Sanusi does not have the interest of Nigerians or SOuthern Nigerians at heart,

Posted by igor on Jan 21 2010

Nigerians will like to know the record of Sanusi when he was with first bank, how many non performing loan did he grant. It is time Nigerians stand up and tell him enough of that dictatorship, let him forcuse on improving laid down policies rather than chasing out his opponent in the name of reform, by the time all this strong forces left or beign replaced by weaker ones, so that he can be able to manuover. this mad man is leading us to a ditch.

Posted by AAA on Jan 21 2010

Exactly...Well said John. African's do have a sit tight mentality. even when the constitution says max of 2 terms.. OBJ still tried to change it for his selfish interest. Yardua is in saudi for over 50 days without handing over, WE ARE NOT RIPE for the sort of voluntary handovers, It is obvious Akingbola and co didnt possess the ability to take the banks anywhere and they still do not want to go.... Someone needs to get them out and it wouldnt be the shareholders, as they family members are typically the largest shareholders, At the end of the end, these organisations are holding DEPOSITORS money... (Market women, spare part sellers, etc, ) and the money should be protected. It doesn matter what the BOFI act said, acts are there for a purpose and should and could be refine as new developments surfaces, The job of the central bank as least one o the function is to protect bankers from recklessness and fraudulent behaviour and this is what CBN is doing, It is not untypical for some of us to raise the roof when new measure are introduced, but hey... Wall st didnt want a curb on their bonuses do they? it is business as usual for them as other loses everything. Central banks are there to protect DEPOSITORS, DEPOSITORS, DEPOSITORS

Posted by Steve on Jan 21 2010

Mr Nwosu, the term limit wouldnt bring confidence back to the economy, what ll restore the economy is transparency, development (infrastructure buildng), good Leadership/Management. All the things you failed to mention in your self serving argument. These CEOs bought shares in their children's househelp, dogs, businesses name to keep control, So who are the shareholders to determine the tenure?

Posted by Nike ao on Jan 21 2010

@steve:one step at a time. The horse fisrt, then the cart. @ekpe uzoh. Regulating the tenure of CEOs is part of REGULATORY functions! Nigeria needs Institutions not Personstutions!Dis u say leave Nigerans to mind our business? Puhleeze! Hare brained Nigerians have gotten us where we are now, cos they were left alone to do as they pleased! No law, noenforecment, means no order. Look where we are now after now- 50 years of much motion without movement! Mbok!

Posted by Afunku on Jan 21 2010

If we look at what has happened in the past few months vis a vis sacking of bank executives there is no way one can determine the sincerity of sanusi but at the same time we all have to understand that there is no policy that does not have its side effects even if it is positively intended. I support the tenure fixing for bank executives as a matter of fact it will checkmate their perpetual stay in power and again it will create confidence in the minds of shareholders that their money is not being divested for private businesses as we are witnessing in the cases of akingbola and ibru. As events unfold more revelations will become apparent for all to see.

Posted by Nike ao on Jan 21 2010

@steve:one step at a time. The horse fisrt, then the cart. @ekpe uzoh. Regulating the tenure of CEOs is part of REGULATORY functions! Nigeria needs Institutions not Personstutions!Did u say leave Nigerans to mind our business? Puhleeze! Hare brained Nigerians have gotten us where we are now, cos they were left alone to do as they pleased! No law, noenforecment, means no order. Look where we are now after now- 50 years of much motion without movement! Mbok!

Posted by mickey stone on Jan 21 2010

I think sanusi lamido should be sent to a business school to understand the real meaning of capitalism. What people don't seems to realise about this gentleman is that, he never had any clue as how to make the banking system operate excellently strategically. I refer you to his interview with the senate. What he did that day was to rabble rouse them and ignore relevant question that he was asked. Can anybody tell me why he deviated from answering his plan to make the banking sector work? His answers was that the 7 point agenda should be trimmed to 3. He has made so many unspeakable errors. Imagine, the chancellor of the exchequer in England suggesting that corrupt bank directors should be tied up and shot. Not only that, with his new directives on tenure of office of CEO and Managing Directors. He has lost the plot. He doesn't have a clue of how to make our financial establishment work. Remember though, he was a risks expert and not an economist or an authority in the financial world. This is what you get when you don't appoint capable people to the right job. You have brilliant minds like the IMF director (A Nigerian) was not given the job. Mr Lamido is about to change capitalism to sharianism. If there is such a word. He has run out of ideas. He should be sacked

Posted by Deola on Jan 21 2010

@ kenny, year end result for Nigerian listed institutions start usually towards the end of January and beginning of February, so calm down. The policy is still there.

Posted by Pacino on Jan 21 2010

Nigeria has two chief exports from our 'private' sector. Our banking and our churches. Both have been driven largely by Entreprenurs or 'owner managers' if you wish. The list is endless; Oyedepo's winners, Adeboye's Redeem, Oyakilome's Christ Emabssy, Tony's UBA, Jim's Zenith even in manufacturing; Wale Tinubu's Oando or Dangote's conglomorate. They all have a common denominator. As much as I welcome institutionalisation of these institutions, you cannot underplay the role of an entreprenuer in a truly capitalist economy.- Capitalism is driven by the natural greed of man, which is embodied in entreprenurship. Modern economist advocate the shrinking of the role og govt in business, Milton Friedman even advocated the abolishment of the CBN. Perhaps he saw the damage ill equiped Govs like Sanusi can wreck on an economy in the name of regulation. I would suggest Sanusi takes out time to read the job description of a CBN Gov. If he does, he would realise it has little to do with banking regulation and more to do with macro economics (monetary ploices et al) an area he is clearly incompetent. If he is, he should tell us how many jobs he has created since assuming the office, which is a critical measure of the sucesss of any CBN Gov. Enough of this ill informed policies.

Posted by SADI K/MATA on Jan 21 2010

what so ever the case may be, we fully behind the desicion of the apex bank, becouse the more this banks executive stay on the throne the more the go into corruption, ten years is enough.

Posted by helena on Jan 21 2010

@Ponderer..you are right on track! Whether Jim is removed or not,he is zenith bank and will still control it till he dies.Only those who ever worked in that bank will understand my comment.

Posted by Moss on Jan 21 2010

Q1) Shouldn’t this be the prerogative of the banks’ board of directors and shareholders? Q2) What authority does a Central Bank Governor have to impose term limits on chief executives of banks? Q3) Is this legal in Nigeria? Term, age or number of years in service limits are nothing new to commercial enterprises in the US and other industrialized countries. My problem is when term limits are imposed by fiat by the government on private enterprises.

Posted by Bugsy Mcgraw on Jan 21 2010

I just wonder at the thinking of some of our compatriots.! For crying out loud these CEOs may have started these institutions with personal investments but THE ARE ALL NOW PLCs and therefore answerable to the public and shareholders! It should nt be business as usual. Some talk of Sanusi targeting certain CEOs from some other parts of the country...ok...is that why Akingbola and Ibru broke all 'records' ??? C'mon, fellow Nigerians, alot of you cried out for a positive change and now its happening. Finally, alot of this so-called Sanusi policies have been in the plan of the CBN for years but past governors of CBN just lacked the 'liver' to enforce. The revolution to take back our country is just starting but this time THE REVOLUTION WILL BE TELEVISED!

Posted by Another Poor Deltan on Jan 21 2010

@ AAA, so you complain about Africans ignoring constitutional term limits and then canvass that we should ignore the law (BOFIA)? My broda, if you want to "refine" or change the law, then do it the constitutional way (go through the legislative process where it will be debated and all stakeholders have their say, even if not their way) and the not military or feudal way. Furthermore, for every Akingbola sitting tight, there is a Pascal Dozie or Fola Adeola that has voluntarily left office. So let's please dial down on the stereotyping of all Africans. Finally, this prescription that you support is one reason that Africa remains underdeveloped: we take a solution that should be applied elsewhere (term limits for sit-tight political office-holders) and apply it elsewhere that it is not needed while ignoring the transparency regulations that the banks really require.

Posted by Falola on Jan 21 2010

Gentlemen, Until that time when Nigeria is ripe enough to learn that group or national interest superceeds individual interest and when our system would have to run on ''auto'', some kind of forceful ''manual'' intervention is required. ''Sit-tightism'' as we are experiencing in Nigerian Politics today will kill good corporate governance. Even a dying man does not want to leave power! There are millions of Nigerians that can do better than Ibru, Akingbola, Elumelu and the rest of these greedy individuals. They are just opportunists who are ready to ground these Banks having depositors funds so far they are able to stockpile billions somewhere for themselves alone. All these recent discoveries brought about by CBN ''harsh decisions'' have shown us that something is serious wrong with our value system and the conscience of many are stone-dead. For how long will these people be allowed to milk the blood of their fellow Nigerians? Some of them are worse than armed robbers !!! EFCC should ensure they are tried and punished for their crime against humanity all in the name of Capitalism.

Posted by Bola Awe on Jan 21 2010

Someone, please take a good look at Section 37 (Part VII) of the CBN Act CAP. C4 LFN 2004

Posted by Pacino on Jan 21 2010

Nigeria has two chief exports from our 'private' sector. Our banking and our churches. Both have been driven largely by Entreprenurs or 'owner managers' if you wish. The list is endless; Oyedepo's winners, Adeboye's Redeem, Oyakilome's Christ Emabssy, Tony's UBA, Jim's Zenith even in manufacturing; Wale Tinubu's Oando or Dangote's conglomorate. They all have a common denominator. As much as I welcome institutionalisation of these institutions, you cannot underplay the role of an entreprenuer in a truly capitalist economy.- Capitalism is driven by the natural greed of man, which is embodied in entreprenurship. Modern economist advocate the shrinking of the role og govt in business, Milton Friedman even advocated the abolishment of the CBN. Perhaps he saw the damage ill equiped Govs like Sanusi can wreck on an economy in the name of regulation. I would suggest Sanusi takes out time to read the job description of a CBN Gov. If he does, he would realise it has little to do with banking regulation and more to do with macro economics (monetary ploices et al) an area he is clearly incompetent. If he is, he should tell us how many jobs he has created since assuming the office, which is a critical measure of the sucesss of any CBN Gov. Enough of this ill informed policies.

Posted by KGB on Jan 21 2010

Sanusi please ride on and ignore these enemies of progress. i wonder how any well meaning Nigerian can fault a policy that will drive home the point to our Bank MDs that there is truly life outside banking. A perhaps unintended side effect of this policy is that it will force these relatively young, vastly experienced and wealthy individuals to set up structures for their post banking life. Imagine the employment opportunities this will bring about for our unemployed youth. Perhaps realising this, bank MDs will do well to ensure that the Banks they manage are actually designed to support the growth and success of non-bank businesss, since they might very well need to set up and sustain such during their post-banking life!

Posted by bilkisu on Jan 21 2010

The central bank governor is doing a great job by reforming the banking sector.Lets give him a chance am sure the target to make our economy great will be achieved Insha Allah.HE IS A HERO LETS SUPPORT HIM AND CBN.

Posted by Anti-resistance on Jan 21 2010

Why do so many of NEXT's stories have an agenda, can't you just give an impartial report on a story? Surely it most be possible to find two other 'experts' that agree with the CBN's decision? Anyhow, many complained bitterly about bank consolidation and the banking sector did not implode, so why oh why are Nigerians so resistant to change! The 10 year tenure is a common sense measure that is replicated in different degrees all over the West. It hasn't stifled capitalism there so I'm not show how exactly it's going to stifle capitalism in Nigeria. And we wonder why corruption remains the status quo.

Posted by Henroe on Jan 21 2010

I am deeply surprised at the level of jealousy and irresponsible opinions some ordinarily would be knowledgable countrymen are exhibiting here. Why is everyone talking about Jim and Tony as if they are owing them.Jim started a bank in 1990 and from nowhere has brought it to almost be the no 1 bank in Nigeria. The man has also invested in many other facets of our economy that is today the source of livelihood to many. He remains the idol of many. By the way. pls JO already has plans for the bank, Sanusi declaration or not and the plan has been in process for the ones that cares to know. Please let sleeping dogs lie. Zenith or Jim or its Shareholders already knows the direction of the bank. ok

Posted by Passionate Naijarian on Jan 21 2010

@ johnkuzo & AAA, you guys are great! You're SPOT on!!! I totally agree as you both spoke my mind. What baffles me most is the way people say something that has never been done anywhere in the world cannot and must not be done in Nigeria. For once, let Nigeria set good precedence. For those saying Sanusi should forget about petty corporate governance issues and focus on only real economic issues, you'sincerely mistaken! Sound corporate governance framework is very fundamental to economic growth. Sanusi, please ride on. God will see you true.

Posted by Obalola on Jan 21 2010

@mickey stone:You & your likes are free to continue your mouth spraying at Sanusi. Call him whatever you like, the fact that he has cut the rogues in the Banking halls to size is national pleasing. The Nwosu of the Shareholders Association can jump to the see for all I care, afterall himself and his Association are there to fleece the Listed Companies, I wondered where he was when Ololo & his gang were raping the financial system. Gov Sanusi, please don`t mind the noise makers, the Banking System is still in need of more control and regulations, the tenure limit is just one of them. When the Banking Turks were performing financial magic, I wondered where the Nwosus of this world were. Enough is enough Nigeria must move on and blind thieving must stop. Ko si oro lenu omo ole.

Posted by Another Poor Deltan on Jan 22 2010

@ AAA, so you complain about Africans ignoring constitutional term limits and then canvass that we should ignore the law (BOFIA)? My broda, if you want to "refine" or change the law, then do it the constitutional way (go through the legislative process where it will be debated and all stakeholders have their say, even if not their way) and the not military or feudal way. Furthermore, for every Akingbola sitting tight, there is a Pascal Dozie or Fola Adeola that has voluntarily left office. So let's please dial down on the stereotyping of all Africans. Finally, this prescription that you support is one reason that Africa remains underdeveloped: we take a solution that should be applied elsewhere (term limits for sit-tight political office-holders) and apply it elsewhere that it is not needed while ignoring the transparency regulations that the banks really require.



post a comment

Your name: *



* = Required information