Lead Image

Britain’s Development Minister Mike Foster. DFID is having a hard time getting British citizens to support foreign aid. Photo: REUTERS

Stop giving them our money

Print print Email email Share Share


The percentage of United Kingdom citizens who support the UK government’s overseas aid is fast declining, a top government official told some African journalists last week.

Paul Mylrea, the Director of Communications of the Department for International Development (DFID), said that the biggest challenge the agency faces is demonstrating the impact of its operations to the British public.

Corruption makes it pointless

Besides, Mr. Mylrea noted that the existence of a high level of corruption in some of the countries that are given aid by DFID has continued to puzzle the British citizens.

“There is a rising percentage of the people that believe that most aid is wasted and that corruption makes it pointless donating. About 52 per cent are still sceptical about our mission. People know about DFID in other countries, especially in countries where they are present but in the U.K. hardly anybody knows about it. Nobody knows that the British government is spending money abroad,” he said.

“As at September 2009, 55 per cent of the population, up from the 47 per cent in September 2008, think we waste the money we spend from this organisation.” Mr. Mylrea also said the percentage of active enthusiasts dipped in February 2009 to 11 per cent from 18 per cent in September 2008.

The Nigerian challenge

Statistics from DFID reveals that Nigeria, the most populous country in Africa, suffers from extreme poverty: 50 per cent of the population live below the poverty line.

The nation is also said to have some of the worst social indicators in the world, as one child in every 10 dies before the age of five, around seven million children are not in school; and more than three million people are living with HIV/AIDS, the second largest number in any country in the world.

Despite this, Nigeria has received relatively little development assistance compared to the average for sub-Saharan Africa. DFID has increased its aid substantially, from £35 million in 2003/04 to £120 million in 2009/10. The DFID’s main challenges in Nigeria are governance, health and education.

Earlier in the week, Nigeria received £100 million (about ₦26 billion) from DFID, aimed towards the Enhancing Nigeria Response (ENR) to HIV/AIDS programme, which spans a six-year period.

The U.K. aid received in 2007/2008 from DFID in Nigeria, totalled £157.7 million.

The poverty challenges remain

Ian Attfield, an education adviser, in a piece titled, “Poverty, One Year After”, said poverty eradication is a long term goal that cannot be achieved over night.

“In Jigawa State in Nigeria, Governor Sule Lamido’s words: ‘We cannot continue to stay in the comfort of hotels, discussing poverty and claiming we are interested in eradicating it. There are people talking who have never seen a hoe. They have no idea of what is called the Nigerian peasant going about his life with untreated diseases…’” he said.

Mr. Attfield, however, said that with the support of such aid programmes, much better government planning and budgeting systems are now being put in place, which are essential to cope with the swings in revenue that come from Nigeria’s oil wealth.

Origin of DFID

Set up in 1997, DFID made fighting world poverty a priority, as opposed to Britain’s former aids programme which concentrated mainly on economic development. The programme was then managed by the Overseas Development Administration (ODA), a wing of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.

Among its key objectives, DFID set out to make global development a national priority, while fostering a new “aid relationship” with governments of developing countries.

According to Mr. Mylrea, the 2009 DFID’s budget to be spent on the global international development is about £5.6 billion, of which 50 per cent is expected to be spent in Africa.

Back
Dear reader.
While we value your feedback we have to moderate them, so your comments would appear in a maximum of one hour. Please feel free to return and read through again after another user may have replied to what you have said.
Please note that 234NEXT.com bears no responsibility for what readers post, and is not liable for any form of impersonation.

Reader Comments (14)


Posted by mary on Nov 12 2009

i feel the pain of the brittons, in a society like Africa where we do nt know d labor of others we can never appreciate d little gifts. We have govt full of corrupt people and so much shld nt be expected. I also think the british and govt shld have measures that will curtail money laundry.

Posted by TATA on Nov 12 2009

i acknowledge the hypocrisy of the britons, after exploiting these countries for years, they now turn around to throw pittance at them...the 100 m pounds to nigeria, is it free with no strings attached? absolutely not...and the truth is nigeria does not need aid....it is rich enough to take care of itself...if it gets rid of all these individuals who continue to cart her wealth back to britain...

Posted by Ben on Nov 12 2009

Much of the "Foreign Aid" from western countries go to their own people, who come on jaunts to Africa, collecting salaries from the "Aid", riding around in expensive SUVs and taking useless notes. The balance typically has "Buy British" strings or whatever donor country's strings attached to it - for worthless goods, including arms, designed more to help the economy back at home than to help the receiving nation. Otherwise, it comes with the understanding that they will go to head of the line in bidding for commercial projects. Then they stand in Parliament with pious faces talking about how much "Aid" they gave to Africa. What a joke! What hypocrites.

Posted by kelly on Nov 12 2009

Mary, stop embarrassing yourself. Who are you apologizing to? Africa is not a single society. You cannot paint the entire continent with one brush stroke. Aid to Africa is generally ineffective because it is generally misguided. Historically, Western governments have given seemingly never-ending amounts of cash to governments in different parts of Africa that were either explicitly corrupt or in many cases operating without the mandate of the people. In Nigeria's case, I personally believe any aid that was received during the time of any our military regimes is a wasted effort for which Nigerians today should not be responsible. Otherwise it is tantamount to holding a kidnapping victim financially responsible for reimbursing a police force's efforts for rescuing him, instead of charging the kidnapper. Gowon, Buhari, Obasanjo, Abubakar, Shonekan, and Babangida are all still alive. They should be responsible, along with the estates of their deceased counterparts for Nigeria's debts, which was almost entirely racked up during non democratic regimes. As far as donor governments are concerned, if they would treat African and other developing nations as equal business partners instead of beneficiaries, both sides could prosper. It is in the best interests of more than just Nigeria for electricity and water and fuel to flow properly in the country. There is a direct and fair benefit derived from investing in Nigeria, as opposed to encouraging and aiding corruption, only to wag fingers in disappointment afterward. You cannot complain that aid money is ineffective when you hand it out without conditions and then allow it to be repatriated secretly into hidden bank accounts in London and Zurich, which only make more money for donor countries, while making poor countries poorer.

Posted by Bolaji David on Nov 12 2009

According to Mr. Mylrea, the 2009 DFID’s budget to be spent on the global international development is about £5.6 billion, of which 50 per cent is expected to be spent in Africa. Yes, Nigeria got £100million out of the £5.6billion budjected for DFID. Thats about 1%. Well Thank you Britain. Its not ur fault at all that this insult is passed to Nigerians and Africans. If our leaders (political and Religious) had gotten it right. We would have been partners today than dependants. Well Britons have tried but they should also know that they've cheated us with an amount that will take hundreds of accountants to reconcile.

Posted by Ifeoluwa on Nov 12 2009

Tata, the rate on which you comment on every single piece of news and article on NEXT on a daily basis, suggests to me that you are not busy person. Get a job!

Posted by Demmy on Nov 12 2009

They give us aids, our corrupt leaders cart the money back to their banks, so technically they get the money back immediately with interest. And supporting Ben's post - who's the beneficiary now?

Posted by olumide on Nov 12 2009

They should do a poll and whether the average Nigerian is aware of DFID. They should do another on e on whether we want these aids. Oyinbo does not understand that there is a huge disconnect between the Government and the people. He cant see that UMORO doesnt represent the average Nigerian.

Posted by Wahala on Nov 12 2009

The british man on street has no clue about what aid really entails and therefore will never have any say in what their government does. Aid is actually costing Africa a lot. They keep banging on about corruption but continue to give aid because it is necessary for their industry in britain. Their goods are forced into the African market as one of the many unfair conditions of getting the aid. They also know that whatever is left of the cash, after their consultants are paid and provided for, will end up back in their country. They also never ever allow the history (or rather antics) of the british in Africa and other colonised regions to be taught in their schools because they'd rather have their citizens believe they have have no hand in what is happening in Africa today. The British are the most hypocritical people you will ever come across. Let them educate their ignorant citizens on the complexity of aid. Don't even get me started on their "Charity" providing water for remote villages in Africa for children who must always be photographed with flies on their faces. Charity is big business in Britain.

Posted by TATA on Nov 12 2009

@ifeoluwa...the rate at which you notice my comments means you are not doing something useful...don't get a job, join the pdp...

Posted by Green9ja on Nov 12 2009

@kelly and Bolaji David...good point. Thanks for your wise comment. It takes two parties for corruption to flourish and i guess the donor wins either way.

Posted by Jon. on Nov 12 2009

Britain needs to slash trade barriers to Africa yesterday as an alternative to propping up the world's poorest countries with handouts. Ifeoluwa, for you to know TATA commented on every single news suggest you have been reading his comments, doesn't sound like you are busy either. Dont throw stones if you know u live in a glass house, just my 2 cents

Posted by pls take your money away on Nov 13 2009

Pls we dont need your moneyy,your aid as made us unproductive.

Posted by John on Nov 13 2009

I recently got into an argument with a fellow on another news board over a video clip of a speech our dear Chimamanda Adichie gave at Oxford University recently. The topic of her speech was the "Danger of a single story". The gist of her speech was that Westerners view Africans as a helpless continent, a people who are unable to take care of themselves. And as such, their relationship with us is defined in that context, as a people always needing help. She wanted to show that we have a lot of success stories, like herself and others, and therefore and are capable of taking care of ourselves. Unfortunately, her effort is muted by the current state of affairs in Africa. I had pointed out in my response that they are not far from the truth. We really can't seem to figure out how to take care of our affairs. I also mentioned that it is foolish to expect them to treat us as equally partners on major international issues (like joining the U.N. Security Council) when every time you read a Nigerian daily, there is another story of a foreign government official coming to Nigeria to hand-off a check to our government. If it isn't the British, it is their cousins, the Americans, or the Japanese, or the Scandinavians, the European Union, and the list goes on. Even tiny Denmark of about five million people gives us aid and we gladly accept. How shameful. Just in today’s NEXT issue, I saw two headlines to support my argument. This story, “Stop giving them our money”, and “European Union votes N10 billion for projects in Niger Delta”. If you go another two weeks, you are bound to read more stories like this. There is nothing inherently wrong in accepting aid to address a major social and economic crisis. There are many countries that were once in our shoes, but have graduated from the perennial aid recipients to givers. The Europeans stand as an example, after WWII and many Asian countries. They all have been able to grow their economies to become net givers. We should be able to learn from our problems and try to mitigate it from occurring year-after-year. And if they should occur, we are in a better position to solve it ourselves rather than depend on others. Unfortunately, that isn’t the case. So the cycle continues. Can you blame the average Brit, who is cynical about the aid their government gives?



post a comment

Your name: *



* = Required information