Lead Image

Substance over style

Print print Email email Share Share


Bruce Wasserstein, the late chairman of Lazard, the storied investment bank, and dealmaker extraordinaire, used to say that it was the lot of the corporate advisors to offer a lot of advice to companies for free, which can be a thankless task. The double facts that the counsel was valuable and free did not mean that the companies would take it. Companies are hard-wired to discount pro bono recommendations. Bearing the odds in mind, here are some suggestions to companies on the Nigerian Stock Exchange on keeping investors engaged through the recession. Actually, investors might also find them useful in judging companies.

Let me begin by saying that companies and investors need to perish the thought that there will be a flight to safety. It is a material misapplication of meaning. The origin of the term is derived from the preference for government issued securities with reliable coupons over volatile equities. Therefore, it is misleading for companies faced with an unprecedented economic uncertainty to pretend that they will be beneficiaries of a flight to safety.

Last month, an analyst note from Vetiva, the securities firm, commenting on the Q1 2009 results of a leading mid-tier bank observed that the bank was poised to take advantage of the flight to safety in customer deposits. While the bank's management should be commended for navigating treacherous waters without capsizing its vessel, it is a misnomer to describe a pass mark in the Central Bank special audit examination as a certification of ultra-safety for revenues, profits or dividends.

Risking reputation

Companies run a major reputational risk when they set expectations that they will be hard pressed to meet. The only thing worse is when companies allow others to set performance expectations for them. In either case, companies owe it to investors to set the records straight if they hope to build and maintain street creed, an asset as liquid as any on their balance sheets.

It beats the imagination that in the past year, CEOs of fewer than ten percent of the companies on the NSE have granted media interviews outlining their response to the crisis. For unfathomable reasons, even these interviews quickly turn to artless ego-profiles. In a period when the share price has fallen by more than fifty percent and write-downs are in the tens of billions, why would shareholders want to know how the CEO met his spouse or his preferred summer holiday destination? It is not only an insult to shareholders but an indictment of C-suite values. While Rome burned, Nero fiddled.

Establishing street credibility

Here are my suggestions for companies that want to establish street creed in the economic downturn. I have listed them in five consecutive steps.

First, companies should be talking more about the business environment in which they operate with adequate emphases on the unique challenges, threats, opportunities and constraints faced by their sector. The latest financial result is just one data point and a lagging indicator at that. Companies should proactively embed that performance in a tracing narrative. They should stop waiting until the results release date to talk about their operating environment.

Second, companies should be discussing their strategy for surviving and thriving in the inclement environment. The obvious vocabulary here should be cost-cutting, new business, client retention, cash management, strategic partnerships, business unit reviews (divestitures, spin-offs, sales, mergers, acquisitions) and increased investment. They should readily provide the convincing case for their choices over the alternatives. Targets should be time-linked and not open-ended. Furthermore, instead of broad statements like ‘we are looking at a number of opportunistic acquisitions', companies should be clear on why any contemplated action is consistent with the long-term strategy and how soon it expects to complete a transaction.

Third, companies should clearly state how they are executing on the strategy and measuring progress on that scale. Again, they must move beyond generalizations in updates to specifics. Execution is king. Since the whole idea is to make the investment community reach the same conclusions on the company's prospects as the board, companies must provide them with the same key inputs. Garbage in, garbage out.

Fourth, companies need to be frank about their estimates of the duration for which the trough season will last and when they expect returns from their strategy to begin to pay off for investors. It is plain deceitful for companies to give the impression that recent write-offs are the last piece of bad news they will hear. There is more where that came from. This downturn will not be wished away. Long-term is the new short-term.

Finally, companies should be seizing every opportunity they can for face-to-face meetings with shareholders, analysts and the financial press. Management should be going on road shows to cities with major shareholder populations and hosting one-on-one meetings with significant holders of the stock. Of course, management time is scarce and the logistics are costly. But companies need to ask themselves this: "expensive in relation to what?" As the saying goes; penny-wise, pound- foolish.

The writer is the managing director of a full service investor relations firm based in Lagos.

Back
Dear Reader.
While we value your feedback we may block inappropriate comment. Please feel free to respond to new comments. Note also that 234NEXT bears no responsibility for what readers post and is not liable for any form of impersonation.

Reader Comments (3)


Posted by Fresh Ideas on Nov 06 2009

One word. Excellent! Keep it up man, your analysis and willingness to go out speaking for the ordinary and not so ordinary investor is heartwarming. It's not just in the piece, but in the prose. Good work.

Posted by Dam Dam on Nov 07 2009

excellent stuff, in times like these you'd think companies would be all out bombarding us with information to make us keep faith with them

Posted by TATA on Nov 08 2009

you are asking companies to embark on a "rebrand" ala nigeria...does guiness, have to do this? no...because its product does not need any hype...'they' are companies and 'there' are companies...those with products we the people could not do without, would survive, engagement or no engagement...this comment is not about your writing style...



post a comment

Your name: *



* = Required information