Lead Image

Tony Elumelu of United Bank of Africa (UBA) and Jim Ovia of Zenith Bank ; the CBN ask both men to step down. Photo: SUNDAY ADEDEJI

Central Bank asks Ovia, Elumelu to step down

Print print Email email Share Share


Banking titans Jim Ovia and Tony Elumelu, who have dominated the sector in recent years, are among those who must step down on or before July 31 this year, under new guidelines by the new Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) limiting the tenure of bank chieftains to 10 years.

Mr. Ovia has been the managing director/chief executive of Zenith Bank Plc from its inception in May 1990, while Mr. Elumelu, who served as the managing director of the defunct Standard Trust Bank (STB) in 1995, emerged as the group managing director/chief executive of United Bank for Africa (UBA) in 2004, following the merger of the two banks.

Akinsola Akinfemiwa, the managing director/chief executive of Skye Bank Plc, will also be affected by this guideline, as he assumed position in 2000.

The new guidelines announced yesterday (Tuesday) at the end of the Bankers Committee's meeting in Abuja, are in line with the ongoing banking reform initiated by Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, the Central Bank governor, to enthrone good governance in the nation's financial system.

It's all about institutions

Samuel Oni, the bank's director of banking supervision department, who announced the guidelines, said they are designed to help define the tenure of banks' managing directors and chief executives and institutionalise the appointment of banks' chief executives.

"Those CEOs of banks that are affected by new guidelines have been given up to July 31 to prepare a successor as approved by their boards and have a credible succession programme that would be monitored by their boards and subjected to the monitoring to the CBN," Mr. Oni explained.

He disclosed that the directive, which has already been communicated to the managements of all the 24 Nigerian banks, is also to ensure that banks have a good succession plan as well as avoid the temptation of personalising their institutions.

"In terms of the appointment of the CEOs of banks, the conditions and terms under which they were appointed and approved by the board must also be ratified and approved at the annual general meetings and such terms of appointment in the first instance shall not exceed five years, though it is renewable for another term, provided that the period of service cumulatively does not exceed 10 years," he added.

No exemptions

Mr. Oni further clarified that where a bank is a product of a merger, acquisition, take-over or any other form of determination, the 10 year period shall include the pre and post-combinations of the bank CEO's years, provided that the bank that he served was part of the new bank that emerged after the combination.

Any person who has served as chief executive for the maximum tenure in a bank shall not qualify for appointment in that bank or its subsidiary until after a period of three years of his exit as CEO.

CBN, NDIC also included

The new guidelines also affect the governor and deputy governors of the Central Bank as well as the managing director/chief executive and deputy directors of the Nigerian Deposit Insurance Corporation (NDIC). They are also disqualified from being appointed in any capacity in banks and their subsidiaries under the supervision of the CBN and NDIC, until after the expiration of five years from the date of their exit from the CBN or NDIC.

Also, departmental directors of the CBN and NDIC are declared ineligible for appointment in any capacity in the banks and their subsidiaries under the supervision of the CBN and NDIC, until after the expiration of three years from the date of their exit from the CBN or NDIC.

However, Mr. Oni said the directive does not affect persons that have already retired from these positions, adding that henceforth, all banks are expected to ensure that these guidelines are reflected in the terms of agreement of their chief executive officers.

Back
Dear Reader.
While we value your feedback we may block inappropriate comment. Please feel free to respond to new comments. Note also that 234NEXT bears no responsibility for what readers post and is not liable for any form of impersonation.

Reader Comments (142)


Posted by jaypawsnki on Jan 20 2010

I am not sure the CBN should be deciding the tenure of bank chiefs, as long as these men are below retirement age. This move is coming at a time when the investing public have doubts about these institutions. These might result in a dumping of the shares of these banks and I am not sure I will be a holder of UBA stock without TOE at the helm.

Posted by Michael Ijere on Jan 20 2010

DEM DON DO REACH....ABEG MAKE THEM GO

Posted by Aleakwe86 on Jan 20 2010

I admire Sanusi's laudable Banking Reforms but what does the reform have planned for all the banking chiefs who are below the retirement age? What does it have in store for the over 8000 workers that most banks laid off. It's not the plan that matters,it's the after effects that does!

Posted by paquito bites on Jan 20 2010

given the alleged malfeasance of the troubled banks' mds,it did not take 10years to fleece their banks so it may be business as usual ,just accelerated.

Posted by Anil on Jan 20 2010

It's about time...

Posted by Aurora on Jan 20 2010

Now, that's revolution one can believe in. Fresh blood and upward mobility in one fell swoop.

Posted by Deola on Jan 20 2010

This is a fair and balanced decision by the CBN. The overstay of the CEO's is part of the problem we have with the banks today. I also like the new guidelines for the CBN and NDIC directors.

Posted by nurujay on Jan 20 2010

As much as I understand the need to strengthen institutions rather than build personality-driven banks, I wonder if this period of uncertainty in the banking and political atmosphere is the best time to take these measures? Time will tell.

Posted by Apostlepaul on Jan 20 2010

I tink d banks ceo's tenure shuld b dtrmind nd regul8d coz it's a highly sensitiv post,wich if nt careful,d occupnt may c himself as a tin god.If d cbn govnorshp is peggd @ 5yrs,y nt d offic of a bank ceo?

Posted by AAA on Jan 20 2010

Very difficult to say if CBN should decide tenure of Banks CEO, Is this doneanywhere in the world? I do not know... With regards to dumpimg share price, I think share price ia function of return on equity, More sensible investors ll put emphasis on the fact that there is a good return on their investment even if it is a monkey running the company, to say that there might be dumping of the shares is attaching sentiments to the subject at hand, I think transparency, continuity and good management should be what most investors should look for and not the fact that UBA is run by Elemelu, What if dies? does life at UBA stops? Ofcourse not.

Posted by John on Jan 20 2010

CBN better be careful with this latest radical rule. I think there should be a retirement age rather than duration as CEO. In the case of Nigeria, most of these men are the founders of these banks, hence, I don't think 10 years is a long time for founder of a bank to serve as CEO.

Posted by MandingoBoy on Jan 20 2010

The CBN needed to do this as the board of directors of this company didn't do their jobs of providing oversight of the bank's management...think Enron or US banks.

Posted by glory on Jan 20 2010

HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM!!!

Posted by Chris Abbey on Jan 20 2010

CBN role is monetary regulation and economic policy and not internal functioning of private banks entity. CBN does not have that power to do this. If it must be done, law needs to be passed by parliament to that effect. What CBN or Sanusi is doing is power grab that the president even does not have under the constitution. Please stop being a banana republic and let owners/shareholders of companies/banks determine their own tenure or internal regulation. This is nothing but a coup detat on shareholders. STOP THIS NONSENSE!

Posted by Straight on Jan 20 2010

It time they go. Wait and see how they also contribute to the fall of the economy most especially 2007. Sanusi Lamido you they try for this one!!!

Posted by abba on Jan 20 2010

This is getting ridiculous, our banking sector is becoming the laughing stock of the world.

Posted by Ologbojo on Jan 20 2010

as long as depositors' funds are safe and shareolders confidence is held up,any progress-prone reform is a welcome development.

Posted by DOCTOR on Jan 20 2010

without any apology I dont trust SANUSI. He is very insincere. HE is scheming banks to be bought over by the NORTH. Everything points in this direction.. He couldnt get Tony and Jim with his big stick so he determines another route which is the new rules to get hardworking men out of the way....WHERE in the world do bank CEOs have tenures???this tenure is absolutely at the discretion of the bank board members and not some insane regulator.....boy

Posted by Term Limit on Jan 20 2010

Bold, good, Cecilia and Erastus were just too powerful and they lacked the restraint to administer a government licensed deposit taker. However, the strangle hold over FCMB by the Baloguns and of Adenuga on ETB still in place. What additional measures can be put in place to prevent them from going wild, like the funding of elections, and other funds diversionary tactics?

Posted by BALOGUN on Jan 20 2010

THIS IS ANOTHER PROOF THAT NIGERIA IS NOT READY FOR DEMOCRACY. SINCE WHEN DOES THE C.B.N DETERMINES WHO,S THE C.E.O,S AND BOARD MEMBERS OF A BANK THIS IS DICTATORSHIP AT ITS BEST. PLS MILITARY TAKE OVER AT LEAST THE WORLD WILL KNOW NIGERIANS ARE LIVING UNDER A DICTATOR.EVEN HAITI RANKS HIGHER THAN NIGERIA IN THE U.N,S HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX HAITI 158, NIGERIA 164 OF 182 COUNTRIES .NIGERIAS CASE IS A RICH COUNTRY WITH THE POOREST PEOPLE .UNLIKE HAITI NIGERIA IS BLESSED WITH NATURAL RESOURCES AND ACADEMICS.WHAT A WASTE.

Posted by A.T. on Jan 20 2010

Who owns the banks? The share holders or CBN. It is unfortunate that the policy makers of the CBN cannot distinguish between private enterprise and government owned parastatal. Soon these same CBN group will soon be asking the CEO of Guinness to resign for not making enough profit, or telling independent insurance brokers how to run their business. In a free enterprise system, you lay down the rules and enforce it, but you don't tell the corporation who they should hire or when their CEO should retire. Mr. Sansui may have started well, but now he is going overboard.

Posted by Nabis on Jan 20 2010

true gut breed great reforms...but can their internal appointment be checked, sometimes men leave while their real true men continue same show!

Posted by gbolahan on Jan 20 2010

cbn decision supported

Posted by koko on Jan 20 2010

my brother tony e don do, follow come rest,make other people follow be GMD. well done any way, you try.

Posted by CIN on Jan 20 2010

Me thinks not personalising banks as has been done in Nigeria is part of good corporate governance.Take a Diamondbank and GT Bank for example, the exit of thier founding CEO's has not affected the banks in anyway, infact i think Diamond Bank has faired better after the exit of Pascal Dozie.This is a god way forward.

Posted by gotoher on Jan 20 2010

Is this legal?

Posted by Lindie on Jan 20 2010

I think i like this particular idea, so all those CEOs would stop thinking that banks are their properties, the banks actually belongs to shareholders and customers.

Posted by Senator Ihenyen on Jan 20 2010

I only support this move based on a reasonable belief that it is meant to institutionalise our banking system, away from the largely demi-god situation we have in our hands today. Since it also has affected the CBN governorship as well, fair enough! Although, retroactive laws have a way of making reforms seem suspiciously like witch-hunting

Posted by De Iykee on Jan 20 2010

It's so unfortunate that we keep chasing shadows in Nigeria instead of substance. Sanusi should concern himself with how to improve the economic indices of our dear country Nigeria and leave the performing bank CEO's alone. Yes He has weeded the ones proven to have embezelled funds from depositors but that is not enough to now dictate who should stay or not. some of these CEO's have worked so hard to ensure they steer the banks affairs to the level they are now. Anyway, I believe Sanusi can do other things that can move the nation forward than concern himself with what can be overlooked. thank you

Posted by SHANE on Jan 20 2010

SANUSI IS WACK AND A GOAT, THESE NORTHERNERS ARE THE BIGGEST PROBLEMS WE HAVE IN NIGERIA, WATS SANUSI'S OWN WITH TENURE AGAIN..............SOMEONE SHOULD CAUTION DIS GUY BEFORE HE COMPLETELY RUINS THE ECONOMY

Posted by kilomita on Jan 20 2010

To:Mr Central Bank Governor.Let me congratulate you on the action you took in saving poeple's funds by calling those reckless Banks CEO's to order.I'll however advise that you do not extend this to other institutions that are currently being run with financial prudence,or else you'll be attracting Legal issues that you cannot survive both within and outside the country.The membership to the Financial sector of any economy is by shareholding and it has never been a socialist terrain.If the rules are not violated you don't whip them to order.I hope you'll not go the way of imposing on the shareholders what they should do with their CEO's and Board members.This is Bus101, and a no-brainer.

Posted by Priye on Jan 20 2010

now i think am confused, i dont understand all this CBN reform, CBN is just there to regulate, but i think the shareholders are the owners of these banks and they have a right to call the shots. CBN is preaching Corporate governance, but they aint practicing it, the only bank i think they can call the shots for are the famous 8 since they bailed them out. where was cBN was staff were sacked? and begining to lose faith in them.i think its hightime all the titans & workers in the banking sector stood up and do something.

Posted by Ayodeji on Jan 20 2010

CBN is the sole regulatory authority in the iondustry so they have every right to state the rule of the game,any bank with its shareholders that are aggrieved should move to either Benin Republic or Ghana....why will someone be saying CBN does not have any power over banks.We are saying this bcos CBN is just waking u to its forgotten regulatory roles......

Posted by KK on Jan 20 2010

Not much will change. These guys will only install their boys and the show will continue. they will just operate from the background and if the new CEO refuses to tow the line, they will have him removed by the board (which they control). The intention might be good but the desired result will not be achieved.

Posted by chaichow on Jan 20 2010

Guys change is constant,whatever happen, the banks musyt remain

Posted by Ferari on Jan 20 2010

I think this is a goog intiative by the CBN but the fact still remains that SANUSI is a failure!!!

Posted by Lugger on Jan 20 2010

Will this nation ever learn from its past? The same malaise that almost perpetrated Abacha and OBJ in power is being played out again.Are we saying a decade is not enough to make a significant mark as a bank CEO?Did GTB go down after Fola Adeola's tenure as CEO?Has diamond bank extinct since Pascal Dozie stepped down as its CEO?People should stop making god out of mere mortals.It is high time these people left the scene for fresh ideas.The only snag is that these people do not have a good succession plan in place, and even when they do, sentiments always override ability.CBN's directive should ordinarily not arise were these CEO's serious about good corporate governance.Perpetuity breeds recklessness,little wonder that even our imperfect consitution sets a maximum period of 4years and two tenures for most key elective offices.Let us be progressive for once please. Or has Nigerian broken down since Daniel Kanu and his infamous YEAA threaten to make Nigeria ungovernable if Abacha does not transmute into a democratic president? Sentiments apart, it is a commendable step by CBN.

Posted by Anikulakpo on Jan 20 2010

This is a very good move, what are you doing as CEO for more than 5 years. This elongated tenure is part of what led to the fall of most banks,with their cult of personalities and high handedness. Only people with impeccable character should be made to lead banks and not vagabonds like Atuche or house wives like Cecelia

Posted by KO on Jan 20 2010

I think CBN should not determine the tenor of Bank MDs. This should be a free market economy agreed they are the banking regulators but the banks are publicly owned.The BOD of the banks should be empowered by law. CBN should institute laws that enhances corporate governance not through CBN circulars, for this is just a short cut that will achieve nothing as their boys will take over. with them are majority shareholders what can the new MDs do. Lets get more independent directors into the boards of the banks.

Posted by DAVID on Jan 20 2010

I think everyone needs to calm down. I don't know about the legality of the CBN action but i do know that in ANY advanced country..you can not run an institution indefinitely. Yes, in the advanced world (which we are trying but failing to imitate) bank CEOs have tenures (reason being that the banks should not be personalised, which is what has happened in Nigeria). Let us get real here, most Nigerian institutions (both public and private) have sit tight leaders that never want to leave and eventually run their institutions into the ground. For a bank to declare profit one year and go to COLOSSAL losses simply shows that none of these banks (Skye, UBA) are particularly well run and i think it is time for new people with new ideas to run these banks.

Posted by Isaac Akins on Jan 20 2010

its time for the big boys to join the PDP

Posted by igodan victor jr on Jan 20 2010

very good..i hail sanusi...........

Posted by Kananga O'malaya on Jan 20 2010

The aim of this latest directive is clearly stated by the CBN: to avoid personalising the banks. So if one decides not to hold shares of a particular bank cos the incubent CEO is leaving, good for him. What would such person do assuming (God forbid) such CEO droped dead? the CBN has a strong legal dept that advices it on issues so if it were not appropraite, they wont have taken such a decision. So commenting here abt lawss that the contributor himself doesnt know is vile.

Posted by King on Jan 20 2010

At last ...

Posted by Vikky JJ on Jan 20 2010

Lugger is right, we should try to be clear headed about these guidelines. They are actually meant to bring a cleaner vista to our banking and finance industry. Let's pray that the fresh air will eventually do us good all the way down the line and the political fields could do with a little of this too. Lets stop thinking in terms of North, South or East and think instaed of Nigeria. Isn't it time?

Posted by Gaia on Jan 20 2010

This does not make much sense to me...In the private sector you can be CEO till you reach retirement age; why is this different for banks? If there is no wrongdoing, why make a case for them to leave? This does seem like a personal vendetta to me, like Sanusi wants to bring them down since he couldn't touch them with the last time...

Posted by Shawn on Jan 20 2010

CBN has only stepped in where board members had failed to function and how can they function when the banks in question are owner-managed... what the GMD says goes. Pls let's stop bickering over the legality or some phanthom Northern agenda.. I really don't care if there is. If as a CEO you claim to have truly built an enduring institution, then step aside and it should self-run. While I don't fully support Sanusi's raid (I reserve further comments), I believe he has chosen to do something most would dare not. So if these reforms will move the industry forward, then so be it!!!

Posted by Balanced view on Jan 20 2010

For all that say this is not legal, or not promoting a free market economy, I say to them Nigeria is not normal so normal rules do not apply, simples! I believe rules/laws have a spirit, this one by Lamido is carries a spirit of change with it (for those fetish Nigerians reading this I don't mean spirit in the literal context). We need laws that promote even more "change" from the parliament. My hope however is that this will not result in CEO's running banks like politicians run their affairs --"it's my turn, let me get as much as I can now". CEO's will now know that onece they're next in line for the job, they have only 10 years to go before retirement and I say retirement because most will probably be too proud to accept any other offers in the private sector - OR I think they'll may do like the MR Anambra (Soludo!).

Posted by finance-buff on Jan 20 2010

Good gutsy policy move that will go a long way in entrenching corporate gorvenance in the system.

Posted by nemi2002 on Jan 20 2010

This is not a new policy and has been there even when Soludo was CBN governor. Sanusi is just implementing the policy.

Posted by Balanced view on Jan 20 2010

Truly CEO's can have effect on the stock market, especially if the have a reputation for being shrewd, prudent or otherwise. However, how many of these CEO's truly affect the stock market by their shrewdness or passion for success and innovation? NONE is the answer! Most of the sectors in the Nigerian economy are not yet consumer led, i.e. organisations where consumers have a say in what happens, consumers can voice thier opinions and something gets done about it - companies generally do what they like, there's no level playing field for all service providers - some can bribe their way through deals - the more you can bribe the better, "Want a loan come to our bank, I can get it for you, you're my friend, no you're my mother and of course, you're also my auntie". Until corruption is routed out of our system, we should not expect laws that make sense in a normal economy, this is an abnormal state and you don't apply normal laws to solve abnormal occurence. The state of affairs of the Nigerian State is not NORMAL so we need extraordinary measures and those measures cannot be directly compared to other countries with a "NORMAL" status quo.

Posted by Mo on Jan 20 2010

How can they have a credible succession process in place for such large corporations in just 5 months? Is the CBN joking? GE uses up to 15-20 years to groom a credible successor! Something is wrong with how CBN is going on with its otherwise good reforms.

Posted by MY on Jan 20 2010

So the CEOs thought they will never leave abi? Sack them joo. Ovia will become the CEO of his VISAFONE. Enough is enough.

Posted by MY on Jan 20 2010

So the CEOs thought they will never leave abi? Sack them joo. Ovia will become the CEO of his VISAFONE. Enough is enough.

Posted by Kento on Jan 20 2010

Doesn't this affect Tayo of GTB (15yrs there) and Aig of Access? how come their names were not mentioned? Also they should all be allowed to go when they reach their retirement age...there is no substitute for experience o! Sanusi take note

Posted by Toks on Jan 20 2010

Great decision from Sanusi again. The CEO post of a bank should not be like that of an Olubadan or a Sultan. It's high time these bank czars leave the stage and give room for new ideas. I pray Sanusi will extend the same treatment to Insurance Companies as soon as possible.

Posted by My two penny on Jan 20 2010

I don't know about tenure limit for bank CEO's, most of them actually own the banks and are well below the retirement age.....BUT PLEASE LET THE OLD HAG IN NNPC GOOOOOOO!rilwan lukman abeg go do grandpa for ur great grand children wey dey house.

Posted by CountryMan on Jan 20 2010

there is more to this than meets the eye...

Posted by IGBO MAN on Jan 20 2010

Sanusi should be transfered to reform our oil sector, I think that he will do better there. This new system is what he could have used in the beginning of this banking reform, but now our spirits are low. by the way when will ATM start? I like this one.

Posted by nurujay on Jan 20 2010

I think the reaction of commentators on this page shows that this may just be the inevitable bad idea that follows the good initiative. In truth, the position and tenure of MD/CEO is determined by shareholders on an annual basis. As I earlier stated, I see the need to promote institutional development over personality-driven banking structures. And quickly too. But when people on this narrow page start celebrating the "downfall" of Elumelu or Ovia, then I foresee cloudy skies ahead.

Posted by igur on Jan 20 2010

SO many complains, but who has the right to remove sanusi there, nobody until he completes his northern agenda, for GODS sake this northerners have accumulated all the powers in NIGERIA, they have the military, they have the presidency and now they are skemming to have our banks and money, shame to southerners that Obasanjo gave back power to the north... we are finished

Posted by True comment on Jan 20 2010

For those that are shouting that Sanusi represent some phamtom hidden agenda. Is it not the boards that accented to most of these problems?. Where were they when they were granting loans and bonuses to themselves. We should all be supporting Sanusi for making these brave decisions and instilling cooperate rules. Has anyone of you people been to these so called shareholders meetings in Nigeria to experience the shenanegans that goes on there?. Most Nigerians are incapable of taking important decisions that will create a wave. should we live evrything to GOD as usual. Thank GOD for Sanusi and may he continue to bless him for bringing some sanity to the system

Posted by Nicole Odiete on Jan 20 2010

First it started with the sack of certain Bank CEOS. From a broad point of view, I feel that this initial step was taken to enable positive and needed change in the Banking Sector- but it has become a personal war...With what is being done to Cecilia Ibru, one would think she is the only one with properties (there are thousands out there). However, I would think that the Board of each bank should be tasked with the regulation of tenure of its Directors... Sanusi should please concentrate on needed priorities. Even if this guildline also relates to Governors/Deputies of the CBN, how are we sure that when Sanusi's tenure reaches, he won't figure out a new guildline that would negate this, thus making him not liable? I suggest that the governor of the CBN tackles the issue of employment in the Banking Industry. There should be a distinct and centralized structure regulating employment into the Banking Industry. This would in the long run, prevent unhealthy and mass retrenchments. Now we have thousands of unemployed individuals sitting at homes! Most of these people are the bread winners of their respective families!!!

Posted by Wale on Jan 20 2010

I wonder what these noise is all about. How about if Jim and Tony stepped aside for their boys. Afterall the MD of ETB must report to Oga Mike before he can make any serious decision. Besides sebi Tony was running 2 banks in parallel pre-consolidation. Did Keem Bello Osagie have to be MD to run UBA? Let Sanusi do the talking and the boys will continue playing their game. Sanusi's reform must be thorough for the real sector to thrive not not the noise he makes on the pages of newspapers.

Posted by Eastern on Jan 20 2010

Bank CEO's are not public officials. They are private business employees. It shoudl be the boards and shareholders of these organisations that decide when their employees, including CEOs, leave. The CBN is treading on thin ice here. In a time when the country is already reeling from a multitude of woes, including those specifically in the banking industry, it makes little sense to abritrarily call for the resignation of people who have been responsible for the few positive stories in the industry. Additionally, as is done in most democratically run socieities, new legislation should not be enacted with respect to the past, but with an eye toward the future. If ten years is an agreeable time limit that will become an industry norm, why not make it effectively immediately, allowing all serving CEOs to stay in their posts from now until 2020, barring judgements from their boards to the contrary? Lastly how is it that Soludo's plan to redenominate the naira was shot down, apparently because of lack of the president's consultation and agreement, while Sanusi seems to be able to enact any new ideas in the absence of the same president today? This will only serve to drive the few investors, foreign and domestic, who remain away from our financial services sector, further endangering our economy.

Posted by Fuguez on Jan 20 2010

Elumelu and Ovia individually were 'personally worse-behaved' than Ibru and Akingbola. Their banks were not in distress due to their larger sizes and the fact that they were smalller 'political-financiers'. Their negotiated removal was always on the cards. It was decided that NOT ALL badly-behaved MDs could be disposed of at once. This is simply the way of shaking a couple of bad apples of the tree. Yes, it does not make sense but I guess Sanusi is more focused on the ends (their removal) than the means.

Posted by Food4thougt on Jan 20 2010

I think this new directive from CBN is very good for the banking industry as it is... it does not matter if it is not done anywhere else in the world, in nigeria we are sitdown tight people. this is not the case in europe or US where people retire and hand over to fresh hands voluntarily

Posted by Jackofalltrades on Jan 20 2010

This is rubbish! Soon Sanusi will tell the CEO's how many times a week they can sleep with their wives.

Posted by Omoladex on Jan 20 2010

Only God knows where sanusi is taking the financial institution to. But remember the feedback on the economy

Posted by Tired Lagosian on Jan 20 2010

OMG!!! can those inferring Northern Agenda please shut up, I don't see what positive effects our southern leaders have on the economy. Is it not better that something be done than nothing at all. I think we should read through articles and sit, think for a while before making any comments. CBN is the regulator of the banking sector they can pass any regulation they believe is necessary for the growth of the sector. Also, Sanusi isn't the minister of finance so please address your concern for the economy to the right person. How can an educated person argue that because a person started up a bank he should be there till retirement age, because we did that in the past doesn't mean it is right. It leads to them personalising the business, this isn't even done in the developed countries we keep referring to. Any change in Nigeria can only come from us, no more glorification of private and public looters.

Posted by Omoladex on Jan 20 2010

Only God knows where sanusi is taking the financial institution to. But remember the feedback on the economy

Posted by LagLon on Jan 20 2010

Just to follow-up on my previous thoughts on the subject. What are your views on this? It sounds crazy but ..Goodluck should push to appoint SLS as VP. It sounds crazy but there’s mad logic behind it. Why? 1.Not a Politician/ a technocrat: He will be easier to manage by the President. 2.Can be pushed through: He’s from the North so fits the regional bill. 3.Look positive externally: Internationals would immediately think that the Govt was taking a serious look at the key issues facing Nigeria. 4.Save Goodlucks life: Nobody would harm Goodluck, because if they did – SLS would be President!

Posted by Dayo on Jan 20 2010

AN INCREDIBLY STUPID POLICY! I initially supported Mr. Sanusi's reforms, but he appears to be over-reaching his powers now. What Nigerian banks really require are FULL DISCLOSURE rules coupled with real regulatory oversight, not for the CBN to MICRO-manage privately-owned (albeit publicly- listed) businesses.

Posted by Ebenezer okponipere on Jan 20 2010

Nijja,if we wnt a change,lets ours make a change

Posted by Qassim on Jan 20 2010

If you cannot self regulate, then the CBN will do it for you. GTB had a smooth transition from Adeola to Aderinokun, so why can't other banks follow this example? Simple reason, it is run like a family business.

Posted by Poor Nigerian on Jan 20 2010

Warren Buffet has run Berkshire Hathaway Inc for 40 years (since 1970). Sam Walton ran Wal-Mart for about 30 years (1962-1992) and including its legacy stores for almost 50 years. Steve Jobs has run Apple Inc for a collective period of almost 25 years (excluding the 10-year period that he voluntarily left to found NeXT Computers). Even Bill Gates ran Microsoft for almost 25 years before stepping down as CEO in 2000, but still remains chairman and chief software architect till today. Phil Knight ran Nike (including its forerunner Blue Ribbon Sports) for 40 years from 1964-2004, and remains its influential Chairman.

Posted by JB on Jan 20 2010

@ Tired Lagosian, doing the wrong thing is actually much worse than doing nothing at all.

Posted by Ebenezer okponipere on Jan 20 2010

Nijja,if we wnt a change,lets ours make a change

Posted by pat on Jan 20 2010

it is laudable and should be encouraged because most of these bank chiefs do not know where the line is between their personal company and public company

Posted by Xalim on Jan 20 2010

Banking is a business and while Banks in Nigeria might be owned legally by the shareholders (de jure) the real owners of a bank are the depositors (de facto) and it is the interest of the depositors (you and I) that the CBN is out to protect! Sanusi like myself are insiders and know that this is just the way to go!

Posted by AAA on Jan 20 2010

Funny How Nigerian's take opinion's and call it fact. Granted most of the bank CEO's behaved poorly, but to say one was worst than the others without facts, explain why we are where we are today... As for CBN taking over the banks, I am against it as much as i am for it, the against it comes the fact that a VERY good CEO is let go after 10 yrs even if he is doing a fantastic job, also the shareholders should be the ones to determine whom they want as CEO. The reason why i ll opt for CBN taking over is cos, we know African's ll hardly RESIGN for a position, we always want to die there, (GREED). So it makes sense to force these ppl out. We need big institutions and not big men, in Nigeria, Big men is what we have and not big institution, Ovie is the face of Zenith, No one is te face of Barclays... Barclays is bigger than anymore. can say the same with Nigerian banks, it is usually a family affair or a tribal bank. That is my argument for and against what CBN is doing

Posted by Udeogaranya on Jan 20 2010

911 terrorists learned how to fly plane but not the landing. Sanusi lays off about 8000 jobs, none employed. Now attempting to lay off young firebrand ceos. no word on what they should be doing at this young age. Sanusi is simply a terrorist to Nigeria Economy. The court should not allow this.

Posted by The Real Truth on Jan 20 2010

@ Deola "This is a fair and balanced decision by the CBN. The overstay of the CEO's is part of the problem we have with the banks today. I also like the new guidelines for the CBN and NDIC directors. " This is the kind of convoluted thinking that has resulted in Nigeria being one of the most backward nations today. What do you mean by "overstay"? Are banks supposed to be ministries? No, they are PRIVATE institutions! Anyone who understood the concept of free markets would know this!! Nigeria's problem is that we have too many illiterates running around thinking they know what is good for the country.

Posted by JB on Jan 20 2010

@ Xalim, while banking is different from most other businesses (and the CBN should be commended for protecting depositors' funds), the real owners of banks remain the shareholders and NEVER the depositors. Depositors can withdraw their monies, but it is the shareholders that are stuck with the real risk of loss. Actions that effectively erode the legal powers of shareholders to control the business (and thereby their investment risks), effectively constitutes an "economic taking" of property.

Posted by Okosodo Esther on Jan 20 2010

i really think that this is one of the best thing the CBN has ever done since i was born. this is a very great idea i really love it. At least there will be room for the young one's at the top. Once again thank you sir

Posted by Dayo on Jan 20 2010

@ AAA, as someone has noted above, Bill Gates, Phil Knight and Steve Jobs ran (or has run) Microsoft, Nike and Apple respectively for at least 25 years each, and these businesses are so-called "big institutions." In fact, these so-called "big men" built and nurtured these businesses into becoming big institutions, so it is not mutually-exclusive to have both. There are many ways to paradise, and it is incredibly stupid for Gov Sanusi to try to micro-manage all banks are if the same.

Posted by shine your eye on Jan 20 2010

Sanusi is possibly the wisest northerner that ever lived. And whoever appointed him the second wisest. Sanusi is the evil twin of Ribadu, who spent his wisdom doing good. All ye 'southern intellectuals" are playing into Sanusi's hands. Sanusi is carrying out a Northern agenda. But he has calculated it to be hidden behind logical reforms, so that 'intellectual southerners' like yourselves can explain it away as an innocent gesture. Sanusi is wiser than all of you. Nigeria will soon crumble, after the power-drunk north pushes it to its Lugardian limits...

Posted by R. Jackson on Jan 20 2010

If they can't be CEO, can they be Chairman of the Board?

Posted by AAA on Jan 20 2010

@ Dayo.... Bill Gates is not a big man neither are the others mentioned. You can be rest assure if any of the men mentioned crossed the line, they ll be dealt with accordingly. It is not the same in Nigeria, as long as you have Andoaaka as your personal lawyer and you are donating to the PDP, It is HIGHLY unlikely anything ll happen to you, What we have in Sanusi is a rare/unique occurence, normally the likes of Akingbola/Ibru ll hae gotten away, In the U.S, I believe it is the contrary, most offenders ll end up in jail and a few ll get away with their crime. Nigeria most big men, gets away with their crime and a few are convicted, hence the rational of endorsing what the CBN is doing,

Posted by Ante on Jan 20 2010

Sanusi got it wrong this time! He is trying to sell the bank back to the northeners just like we used to have! Since the south is rich in oil and the west have seaports what he think is that the north can take over the Nigerian Banking Sector which is not in the right section! He! Sanusi is loosing a grip of his tie and he is been influenced by Indiuviduals whose selfish ambitions I pray will never be achieved! What has these C.E.O done! Fine I know that Ex-CEO of U.B.A, plc Hakeem Bello Osagie still runs U.B.A. Plc still runs the bank from outside with his Harvard University friend Tony Elumelu! But What is the crime Jim Ovia has committed! He could not axe him with illegal loans so he is trying to give way to northerners! Morover, Where inthe world do Apex bank give directives to change C.E.O's or Where in the world do Bank C.E.O's have tenure. Sanusi is Being misled by Detractors and he would just end up like others if he does not retrace his steps.

Posted by Nwabu on Jan 20 2010

What does tenure have to do with performance??? Look at the greatest companies in the world: Sam Walton CEO Walmart 1962 - 1988 (26 years) Bill Gates CEO Microsoft Inc. 1976 - 2000 (24 years) Jack Welch CEO General Electric 1981 - 2001 (20 years)

Posted by AAA on Jan 20 2010

@ Dayo, Again lets not get carried away here... Are you saying a company that has more debt than capital is a big institution? this is a quote directly from you ""big men" built and nurtured these businesses into becoming big institutions" As far as i know, if you have more debt than equity value and you are bailed out/saved from insolvency via the discount window, since the central bank is the lender of last resort, then there is nothing big about your institution. Infact it is a reasonable assumption to say you do not know what you are doing. We are not assuming most bank CEO ll do as Akingbola and co, but if past history is a good prediction of the future, then measures must be put in place to curb the excesses, Again I do not agree the CBN needs to determine the tenure of bank CEO's, but knowing what we know, (we are not speculating here) banks CEO must be treated like kindergaten kids, obviously they need a lot more looking after than the CBN have been doing, hence why Sanusi is doing what he is doing, If we are sophisicated enough as investors, maybe the shareholders can keep a watchful eye on the management, what you ll findout is the largest shareholders are the CEO's family. (children, cousin, share in phantom companies that belong to the same person) so shareholders watching bank CEO's ll not be a sensible option here. Unfortunately, only CBN can regulate these guys...

Posted by Eccentrik on Jan 20 2010

Why do Nigerians wholeheartedly embrace things that do not work anywhere else? It is not for the CBN to put a limit on the number of years that one person can run a bank. It is for the CBN to ensure that whoever is running the bank is doing a good job of running it in line with laid down rules and regulations governing the banking industry. It is ridiculous that no distinction is made between a well-performing bank with a successful MD/CEO and a struggling bank with an unsuccessful MD/CEO. In the UK/US, the government can only limit banker pay and bonuses in banks that have obtained government funds. They have no right to interfere in the organisational structure of banks that have successfully emerged from the recession without any assistance from the government. Is there some sort of curse hanging over Nigeria that makes people gullible and leads them to applaud whatever is taking place under the excuse of "reform" regardless of the consequences?

Posted by Agboluaje on Jan 20 2010

This is a right step in the right direction, if this have been done earlier, Akingbola and Ibru would not have destroyed their banks.Life CEOs of banks cannot be acceptable in an environment like ours where we have penchant for lawlessness.

Posted by True Comments on Jan 20 2010

Can anyone name any bank in the developed nations where the MD/Chairman has been in that position for more than 10 years. Nigerians have a disposition for misundertanding the way things should run and of turning false self importance to facts. Most of the companies like microsoft, apple and co are all manned by the founders who have majority shares and have not taken public deposits( investors are very different from depositors). Hope you get it. CBN just set the rules on how things should run and like Soludo and Mr President when their terms expires it is either renewed or they go, NO 3RD TERM

Posted by Steve on Jan 20 2010

Ante, Tony Elumelu did not attended Harvard.

Posted by Tired Lagosian on Jan 20 2010

@ JB, I agree with your statement but I don't think Sanusi is doing the wrong thing. We can complain all we want but the insanity in the banking sector affects the poor man, the pensioner, the people who need action now not talk. If shareholders are not going to do anything there is a need for the regulator to step in and make sure sanity is restored. Are we honestly saying that the current MD's have the brains to do it better than anyother? Re: comparing us with other countries, guys let the sector fit, use examples of banks in the us and other countries with sit tight CEO's. How will change occur when we won't let it. Am not saying Sanusi is the best thing ever but I agree with this particular policy, it makes sense.

Posted by Austine Uche Ejeke on Jan 20 2010

Good! let them step down. its not their father's property. By their exit, it will enthrone more transparent good corporate governance and best practices in their respective banks.

Posted by Sari Oyegun on Jan 20 2010

here! here! I SUPPORT. Some MD/CEO's think the banks are their personal treasuries. sorry o! but if my money is in your bank, it is MINE not yours!

Posted by Sari Oyegun on Jan 20 2010

YES, about time!! Some people need to be reminded that the world was spinning before they got here and it will continue long after they are gone!

Posted by Judge + Jury on Jan 20 2010

Stop whinning folks... Think before you post.

Posted by kris on Jan 20 2010

time shall tell

Posted by The disapassionate economist on Jan 20 2010

Interesting arguments here. First, economic theory can safely debunk the idea that a bank - especially one that accepts funds from depositors - is the same as any other private sector company. It is not. A bank is not a Microsoft, a Nike or an Apple. A bank failure would be a source of potential systemic risk - this is why we have seen a slew of bailout packages in the West (and in fact, in Nigeria). In recognising the moral hazard implicit in the likely bailout of any systemically important financial institution, there is an argument that right at the outset, banks need to be regulated differently. Certainly, there is a strong argument that banks that accept deposits from the public should be regulated. How else will depositors' funds be safe? Should such regulation involve limits on the terms of CEOs? In many countries, there are limits in place on the terms in office of public officials in order to check any potential abuse on the powers conferred on them. The same rules apply - often voluntarily - within many private sector financial institutions as well. In this case, the regulator having uncovered widespread abuses in the system, wants to bring about the requisite institutional change to ensure that the regulatory lapses of the past are unlikely to be repeated (SLS or no SLS). There are many ways of trying to bolster institutional strength and governance standards in Nigerian banking. Limits on CEO terms are just one of the many options, but they seem sensible enough, given the circumstances. Of course, the retroactive application of these regulations may well prove controversial. But given that the term of the CBN Governor is itself limited to five years, with the option to renew, if this directive did not apply retroactively, there's a not-insubstantial risk that it might never have taken effect. The success of these measures will depend on whether they serve - ultimately - to strengthen Nigeria's banking system or not.

Posted by Ade on Jan 20 2010

I believe this is a welcome development. I would suggest a single tenure of five years for bank CEOs. There are other talents in the system that can take up the mantle. These people built empires around themselves believing they are untouchables, sacking at will as if they would have no end. It is unfortunate that the banking regulator (CBN) had to interfere in the affairs of private institutions but our kind of problem demands extraordinary measures. Some of our banking leaders are thieves. I worked with them for years and I know a good number of them that have outsmarted shareholders and used profit that should have been for the investors to fund their own private investments in Telecoms, properties, Insurance etc. Some are also responsible for the fraud in the stock market which has destroyed the lives of many struggling middle class. Can anyone explain how UBA shares went from less than N8 in 2004 to over N54 in 2008 or how Zenith was initially listed at N10 and not at a lower price and how it shot up to over N50? Do you know how much those guys cleaned up in the stock market. They are smiling now while thousand of people who bought the shares at the peak are weeping and heavily indebted. Who owns BGL securities and what role did it play in manipulating the stock market to the advantage of a few? What is involved in Ngr's financial sector is more than many know. Sanusi is an insider so he knows these thieves. Leave him alone let him deal with them as he deems fit. After the system is cleansed, we can talk about good governance. Let those who have brought us to our knees go first. if they can't find something else to do let them hawk akara or pure water on apongbon bridge for a change!!!!!!! Laugh. I know those guys have settled their future with heavy investments in Telecoms, properties, airlines etc and they will not need to work again. Do you know how many companies that took facilities from their banks in which they cut deals for personal gains? 'Abeg' leave the matter for Sanusi to handle. If only we cold recover the looted money from the manipulation of the NSE and return the funds to the unwary investors. All these guys meet at Ikoyi club to map out strategies to rape the system. At least I have gone to Ikoyi club with my stockbroker on one occasion and witnessed the proceedings.

Posted by Concerned Nigerian on Jan 20 2010

In reply to the person who said Tony Elumelu did not attend Havard. I can tell you that he did. That is what he tells everybody. He did not do a degree though, he did the management development programmes like the 'eko agba' which anyone can do as long as you have you money - six weeks thereabout. Have you noticed that Tony never mentions where he had his first degree? Those who write about him also deliberately omit that but are quick to let you know he is an alumnus of Havard Business School. They will not tell you he did not go through a rigorous degree programme but the type you get if you have money and head an organization. Can you compare an honorary Doctorate which comes from the recognition of achievements outside academics with an academic Phd? That is what his Havard certificate and those of his associates (EDs)are like. So he went to Havard Business School but not for an MBA. maybe now that he is retiring, he will go for a proper degree in Havard if he can pass the stringent GREs and GMATs.

Posted by Qassim on Jan 20 2010

@Nwabu none of the companies you listed are financial institutions.

Posted by Nike ao on Jan 20 2010

@ Eccentrik. You asked, 'Why do Nigerians wholeheartedly embrace things that do not work anywhere else?' Answer: Because some politically connected Nigerians can commit and get away with blue murder that would incur harsh reprisals anywhere else. Because Godfatherism is practised here to a degree unlike anywhere else. Because basic law and order are virtually non-existent in Nigeria unlike 'manywhere' else. Because Nigerian Bankers live larger than bankers anywhere else, infact larger than the economy, unlike anywhere else! Because self-regulation is practised negligibly by Banks in Nigeria unlike everywhere else. Because Nigerian bankers have been creaming off depositiors funds in corrupt impunity unlike anywhere else! That's why some of us Nigerians support SLS' policy of tenured CEOship of Banks, unlike it is anywhere else. We are peculiuar people, brother/sister!

Posted by Ade on Jan 20 2010

The dispassionate economist has said it all. Thanks for this well thought out comment. Those crying fowl do not understand how the financial system can bring a nation to its knees. We do not have to wait until the government has to bail out all our banks before we have better regulation. Many of us do not take keen interest in what's going on because Nigeria is blessed with crude oil and money comes in anyway? When that money is spent bailing out the banks, we really do not feel it. If Sanusi had allowed the eight unhealthy banks to fail just like we had with Savannah a few years ago, ACB, Forum and the Merchant Banks, maybe we would think differently. Or if we had no petroleum and everyone was forced to pay taxes, you would be more concerned about what the money is used for. Banking bailout will definitely not be on the agenda. To bail out a financial system with the stolen money in a few hands and the CEOs implicated in the mismanagement will be an aberration.

Posted by Tired Lagosian on Jan 20 2010

@ Concerned Nigerian: I can confirm that Tony Elumelu did his first degree in Economics @ Ekpoma and graduated in 1985, but you are right, he's silent about it.

Posted by Observer on Jan 20 2010

It is the responsibility of the CBN to set regulation for the banking industry to protect depositors and the general public - Sanusi is doing his job. We should encourage this type of dedication and clarity and get at least one thing working coherently in this country!

Posted by Steve on Jan 20 2010

@ concerned Nigerian, Agreed. A lot of them are quick to mention Harvard on their CV, attending a management programme doesn't make you an alumni of the school. In my view only if you have gotten a degree from one of these school should you be qualified to us it, but then again, the likes of Akala and Bode George are "Doctors", I suppose it is ok for Elumelu to call himself an Harvard graduate.

Posted by Steve on Jan 20 2010

Harvard university get branch for Ekpoma? LOL

Posted by Steve on Jan 20 2010

Function of a Central bank : Its primary function is to provide the nation's money supply, but more active duties include controlling subsidized-loan interest rates, and acting as a lender of last resort to the banking sector during times of financial crisis (private banks often being integral to the national financial system). It may also have supervisory powers, to ensure that banks and other financial institutions do not behave recklessly or fraudulently. It is all in the definition. Reading is fundamental

Posted by Someone on Jan 20 2010

This is not legal; this are private Cos. SLS is going too far: Sanusi is possibly the wisest northerner that ever lived. And whoever appointed him the second wisest. Sanusi is the evil twin of Ribadu, who spent his wisdom doing good. All ye 'southern intellectuals" are playing into Sanusi's hands. Sanusi is carrying out a Northern agenda. But he has calculated it to be hidden behind logical reforms, so that 'intellectual southerners' like yourselves can explain it away as an innocent gesture. Sanusi is wiser than all of you. Nigeria will soon crumble, after the power-drunk north pushes it to its Lugardian limits...

Posted by MB on Jan 20 2010

Hmmmm...SKYE bank MD is also affected you know....but no one mentions that. Why is all the hype around Jim and Tony...why are these the guys every Nigerian loves to hate? And who cares what schools they went to? Are we counting university certificates or should we focus on acheivements and networth? I bet you all the people hiding behind their computer screens to criticize this pair dont have the balls to achieve half of what they did in 5 years post consolidation(i certainly admit i dont have the balls). For all of you that love to condemn Nigerian success stories - go and read up about a certain Mr JP Morgan - the original cut throat gangster. Celebrate your own!!!

Posted by Concerned Nigerian on Jan 20 2010

Steve, thanks for your comment which ends with Akala and Bode George. I could not stop laughing. It has brightened my day. I am laughing so hard. Who made Akala a Doctor? Sorry I have been out of the country for a couple of years so I'm not current with the jokes like Dr Akala (PhD) . I follow the serious issues though, like this one.

Posted by Odumegwu Awolowo Shagari on Jan 20 2010

@Apostlepaul: If you're going to comment, please make the effort to spell your words properly and completely. Combining letters and numbers to make words is extremely irritating. This applies to many of you out there. Arghhhhhh!!!!

Posted by Andy on Jan 20 2010

@Someone. Forget the Northern Nigeria agenda theory. While this is a possible explanation, our so-called Southern elite have played into their hands through greed. If our southern brother and sisters did right, will the north be able to get rid of them? Microsoft has made over 4000 of its managers millionaires. You can hardly leave Microsoft and get job elsewhere because no company will be able to pay you. You are likely to start your own business. While these chaps mentioned (Bill Gates, Larry Elison, Michael Dell, Phil Knights etc) were moving up, they ensured the welbeing of the staff doing the job. What do we see in Nigeria? Ovia, Elumelu, Akingbola, Cecilia, Bello-Osagie etc have made off with so much money and have become so wealthy and the staff are now being scape-goated. If an average bank staff in Nigeria is re-engineered out of the system, he will be begging for bread within six months if no other job comes along. By the way, the bulk of profits from these banks do not get reported. I worked in the system for close to 10 years so I know what I am talking about. I was in the internal control department of a bank in a particular year when Lagos branches alone (less than 10% of the bank's branch network) made a profit of over N2 bn but when the consolidated group profit before tax was reported, it was less than N2 bn. I am aware that these chaps approve loans to related organizations and end up writing them off out of profit as bad debt before net profit is declared. Only insiders know about those deals and they were rewarded as high flyers getting rapidly promoted to Senior Managers, AGMS, DGMs etc. That is one way our Southern folks fleeced the banks. The first set of Harvard graduates started it and the boys followed suit. There is a Telecoms company funded by an old generation bank and should have been its subsidiary which has ended up in private hands. How are Telecoms companies owned by bank MDs funded? How are their property businesses funded? The revealation of Cecilia Ibru's financial dealings and property investment is a tip of the iceberg. If what Ovia and Elumelu have on ground are revealed, some of these commentators will ask for a revolution and ask for more powers for Sanusi. I am talking as someone who worked with these chaps not 'dem say'.

Posted by RWS2 on Jan 20 2010

@ Dispassionate Economist (and Ade), the CBN actually asserts that the term limits are effectively a shortcut to institutionalizing governance at the banks -- which is why the examples of companies like Microsoft, Apple and GE (and btw, GE accepts deposits through its GECC subsidiary) are precisely apt. Otherwise, can you please explain to us how limiting CEO terms precludes "widespread abuses in the system"? How many years did folks like Jimi Lawal (ex-Alpha Merchant Bank) need to fleece their banks and depositors? There is a saying that a farmer who finds rats in his farm could choose to either fence off his farm or become a (full- or part-time) rat chaser. I am afraid that the CBN appears to have sadly chosen the latter option. And to that extent I agree with Dayo that there is a distinction between strengthening the regulatory framework and micro-managing banks -- in choosing the latter option, the CBN raises a legitimate question as to whether it actually understands this distinction.

Posted by Ade on Jan 20 2010

@MB. Sorry MB, we cannot celebrate evil. What you call success can be achieved without thievery. What those pair (Delta boys) have 'achieved' will come to light when you examine the books of the organizations they head. I have worked in the Internal Control Department of a bank headed by one of those cowboys and I know they are not saints. Did you see how the so-called 'Mr cut throats' of America brought the whole world to its knees? Is that what we want to encourage? Do we wait until we see the likes of Sir ALlen Stanford or Bernard Maddof making off with people's billions before we stop them? Some people are loaded with information but will only come forward when the time is ripe. Nigeria is not ripe for the truth yet that is why some man will be asking us to celebrate Ovia and Tony. Nigeria is a place where a fraudster and round tripping baron gets national honours, so we are not ready yet. Are you not aware of the round-tripping issues at STB back then? They were all involved, some were caught, others weren't. I know a CEO that instructed a friend to move 10% of the PBT to a foreign account before the final figure was declared. That was like 10 years ago when banking profits were under N2 bn per annum. What do you think they would have amassed over the past 10 years if that was done back then.

Posted by JB on Jan 20 2010

Issues concerning the appointment and removal of the management of private corporations (including banks) are governed by STATUTORY LAW under the Companies and Allied Matters Act. I am unsure that CBN guidelines (or the decisions of the Bankers Committee) are enough to override statutory law. Hopefully, Nigeria will not continue to be the sort of place where someone can wake-up one morning and RETROSPECTIVELY take away the property rights of private shareholders (apparently in derogation of the law).

Posted by John on Jan 20 2010

Na wah ohhhhhh

Posted by Okuose A. on Jan 20 2010

So the CBN can determine tenures of the MDs of private banks? For the so called quasi economist in our midst,more jobs were lost by the folding up of the textile and tyre industries.I dont see you screaming for changes? Also what is the function of the board?My advice is for the banks to challenge this so called rules at the boards. It is the right of the board to determine how their banks are run.The CBN is to regulate the legality of their business actions. I hope the idiot apostles of sanusi would not complain when the CBN decides to fix the salaries and benefits and of the banks. Why doesnt he force the banks to allow full unions? As an aside what is the hate toward Jim Ovia and Tony Elumelu?I hope it is not the stupid ethnicity of the yoruba and ibos talking? The biggest thieves in the banking sector were always yoruba? Till today ETB is controlled by Adenuga and his family.So is FCMB Subomi Balogun who stepped down for his son and has his sons running the subsidiaries of FCMB.So I dont get the pharisees and zealots anger calling for the heads of Ovia and Elumelu?Have they done anything wrong or different from their peers? What about dangote?Is his company not using public money?Or the dangote group of companies is too small to affect the nigerian economy? The GTB noise is also irritating? Did Fola Adeola step down or he was forced out because of the usual yoruba intrigues in GTB? Or is He a god of nigerian banking? Fola Adeola did not have the controlling shares in GTB, so he could and was pushed out! This is totally unlike the situation in zenith or oceanic were the individual or family has majority shares. Let the board determine who stays or goes and CBN should and is meant to sanction the boards that are not performing their oversight functions.Sometimes I am just irritated by the shallowness of nigerian thought. But hey let see if the grand plan will work and the nigerian banks come out intact and stronger?I hope..

Posted by Steve on Jan 20 2010

Ladoke Akintola University gave both George and Akala honourary degrees. It simply tells you where we are as a nation.

Posted by Carlito on Jan 20 2010

This is simple! Sanusi has no authority to dictate bank CEO tenure, wake up people this is a power grab, dont be deceived by the fact that some of these banker are corrupt. Sanusi is out to implement an agenda. Wake up people of the south!!!

Posted by Ade on Jan 20 2010

@Okuose A. Don't be irritating by bringing in tribal or ethnic dimensions into this. People are entitled to their opinions based on what they have seen and experienced. Shall we all allow Sanusi to do his work even if it pains a few boot lickers. Ride on Sanusi for the benefit of Nigerians. For the records, if Dangote borrows money from banks to do his business, it is not public money and has nothing to do with his ethnicity. I read today that he liquidated over $1 bn of loans taken for his businesses. That is more honourable than taking what belongs to shareholders to start a telecoms company or other businesses. It is not on the same level as manipulating the stock market for personal gains, offloading at the peak and impoverishing the poor and middle class. Subomi is out, his sons are in, so what? Have you heard that Subomi took FCMB money to start Ijebu or Lagos Lotto for his son and the business went burst or that the staff of the lotto are on FCMB payroll? There are legitimate ways of making money. Stealing is not one of them. Having worked in the banking sector myself, I saw that what it took to be a 'smart and high flying candidate' was that you were prepared to work outside the books and circumvent the rule of law, give loan beyond your capacity as long as you don't get caught, go to any length as a lady to meet unreasonable targets. I know of a very young lady working with one of these two cowboys who ended up having a son for a man over 70 years of age (while marketing him) The reward - rapid promotion till she became an AGM as at 2005, probably an ED now. The earlier those who brought such practices into the banking system and ousted the better for the industry. Is banking the only industry in Nigeria? What about manufacturing? Why is it that only banking stocks exchange hands at a higher rate? It was the same banking stocks that brought doom on the people. Don't you smell a rat?

Posted by Pyemo Afego on Jan 20 2010

From a corporate governance perspective, the move to set a fixed tenure for bank CEOs is welcome. Many of these Bank CEOs, because of their privileged positions as founders or co-founders, tend to act with almost absolute powers - rendering the boards and management committees ineffective. Because of the fiduciary responsibility of banks, it is important that there is an effective board that will establish strong ethical standards and demonstrate healthy skepticism where there are questions or doubts about the bank's policies. The earlier we have Banks that could be described as INSTITUTIONS (e.g First Bank) not FAMILY BUSINESSES, the better for depositors, shareholders, bank employees and other stakeholders.. Its a tough decision to make but definately one that will enhance and improve corporate governance practices, transparency in our banks and other financial institutions.

Posted by RWS2 on Jan 20 2010

@ Andy (and Ade again), assuming that everything you have written is the gospel truth (and I have no reason to doubt that it is), can you please answer the same question that I posed to Dispassionate Economist and explain to us exactly how setting term limits on CEOs solve those problems. Or is this a Nigerian-style "chop-I-chop democratization" of thievery, where one set of thieves will merely be replaced by another set after 10 years? Folks, this is a poor substitution for real regulation (and the disclosure issues that continues to dog Nigerian banks and other companies).

Posted by Dayo on Jan 20 2010

@ ADE: Please answer RWS2's questions and tell us how term limits on CEOs address stealing in banks? Did it take more than 10 years for your young lady pal to become pregnant for his 70+ years sugar daddy?

Posted by Dayo Coker on Jan 20 2010

This makes no sense

Posted by SW8 on Jan 20 2010

Two less red ties and pointy shoes to worry about

Posted by Ade on Jan 21 2010

@RWS2. While I do not contend that such a step by Sanusi will eliminate the problem, it has the capacity to ameliorate it. A knowledge that you will be followed by a new set of leaders who may or may not be your proteges will make you err on the side of caution. You know the books are likely to be examined by incoming executives and your hidden secrets may be revealed. 10 years is a long time to cover up a mess or run a financial institution aground, I would suggest a 5-year single term. Shareholders know very little about how their companies are run. They take whatever the board tells them. Forget external auditors. Arthur Anderson gave Enron a clean bill of health till it collapsed. Remember the saying "he who pays the piper dictates the tune". If those auditing the old UBA under the Havard guru had said the truth, the man would have been ousted by shareholders long before his nemesis caught up with him. In a place where there is the rule of law, MDs and their board members will dare not play around with depositor's money or shareholder's profit. These steps taken by Sanusi are necessary because we do not have the rule of law in Nigeria yet. We need this while our leaders figure out how to operate full disclosure in Nigeria. When a bank fails, depositors lose money (not just shareholders). If you are current, micromanaging is happening all over the world now. Take the UK for example. It has come to the point where the government has to decide what level of bonus is ideal as an incentive to bankers - what do you call that? Micromanaging!!!!!!!! That is in a country where the regulatory framework is far ahead of Nigeria but it missed the impending doom brought about by the financial system. The West also held your kind of opinion until the bubble burst. If you don't intervene as a government, the action of a few will bring 160 million in Nigeria to their knees. Single term of your recklessness and you are out. Let the next man examine the books and tell the shareholders what he has seen there as the external auditors and complicit in the rot. The new guy wants to build a reputation and would not want to be tainted. If on the other hand you see it as one thief goes and another comes in like you have said, it is a lesser evil than a perpetual thief. At least we will now see that there are other intelligent people in Nigeria who can run banks and not cut risky deals. John Aboh now runs Oceanic Bank - that is a seasoned banker that Sanusi can vouch for. They were together at UBA and First Bank. If Zenith Bank remained so and not become a Plc, we would not make so much noise. If STB remained Ltd and not become PLC, we would only be sorry for the depositors and not care what Tony did or failed to do. If you went to the market with IPO and gave an impression that you are a company owned by shareholders (not family business or sole trader) and people brought in deposits in confidence then you should run it not as a private business but as one responsible to shareholders and every kobo should be accounted for or shared as profit at the end of the year.

Posted by Ade on Jan 21 2010

Which of the stuff makes no sense Dayo? Is it the Micromanaging or the lack thereof? Your question on the pregnancy issue sounds sarcastic. We are talking serious issues here. We should not insult anyone's intelligence by suggesting it takes 10 years to get a woman pregnant. That is diversionary and taking us away from the rot on our hands as a nation. We are interested in ideas that will solve our problems. I have made a point highlighting the problems in my opinion and made additional suggestions to what Sanusi has done giving my reasons for taking such a stand. What is your opinion on resolving the issues on ground - sharp practices in the banking sector and stock market by a few who see themselves as consolidated and immovable? For your information, the lady did not have a sugar daddy, she was desperate to meet her target and that was what she got. You pretend as if these problems do not exist or that they are trivial. Your idea please!

Posted by Obalola on Jan 21 2010

@Dayo & co. I assumed you are not literate in Banking therefore you can continue to attack Sanusi Lamido here. Have you ever gone through the BOFIA or CBN Act? Are you aware you can not become a director in a Bank without CBN approvals? are you aware CBN owns the licenses granted these Banks? Are you aware Banking is a highly regulated in Nigeria? Are you aware that irrespective of Incorporation of a Bank @ CAC, the Bank can not operate without the CBN. Have you ever gone through the CBN Governor power instruments? No one is interested in the fall of the CEOs as you guys are insinuating, equally, only fools shall continue to call Sanusi actions a Northern Agenda. You may not be comfortable with the new regime of tenure stipulation for the CEOs but it has become compulsory because its not illegal, yes, the CBN Governor got the powers to do what he did. Apart from the President of Nigeria,the CBN Governorship is another powerful legally created office, hence iam yet to understand how and why Soludo would want to be Anambra State Governor. Sanusi Lamido & his team are acting within the Laws and powers of their offices. If you are not convinced, I will encourage you to approach the CIBN office for relevant literature on the CBN and Nigeria Bankings laws generally. Deola! It is well.

Posted by Dayo on Jan 21 2010

@ OBALOLA: Actually, I have a copy of the BOFI Act here with me (as well as Konyin Ajayi's seminal epistle on both the BOFI and the CBN Act), and would be glad if you can point out where either law provides (or even implies) that the CBN can set term limits for CEOs. The CBN's approval authority over bank directors or chief executives is substantively no different over that of the Council of Legal Education over who qualifies to practice law in Nigeria. The extrapolation that you seek to extenuate from such approval authority would be substantively akin to the CLE setting a term limit for private lawyers.

Posted by JohnQ on Jan 21 2010

Is Sanusi going to put term limits on Chief Executive officers of foreign owned banks? I doubt it. Then why impose term limits on Nigerian bank CEOs? It sounds to me like this fellow is on a crusade to save Nigeria. It is going to take more than putting a term limit on bank CEOs to fix the real problems facing the economy. I am also very concerned with his plans to sell off the troubled banks to foreign entities. He is more concerned with pleasing Western countries than addressing the real issues facing the economy. Someone needs to put the breaks on this follow before he does some serious damage to the economy.

Posted by Dayo on Jan 21 2010

@ ADE: You make 2 likely erroneous presumptions: (1) that the successors will not be proteges of the current CEOs (see Diamond Bank, FCMB and GTB to disabuse that erroneous notion); and/or (2) that the likely successors to the present CEOs (most likely current EDs) are ignorant of the crooked deals being perpetrated. Merely changing faces, rather than making real regulatory changes, is not the answer to what ails our banks.

Posted by Dayo on Jan 21 2010

@ OBALOLA: Btw, if you have trouble finding the provisions of the BOFI Act relating to the CBN's authority with respect to bank directors and officers (there is no corresponding provision in the CBN Act), feel free to look up Section 44.

Posted by AAA on Jan 21 2010

@ Dayo. I dont think the only change that ll be impose by CBN is the term limitation, The banking industry is going through regulatory changes, (this is not unique to Nigeria). The U.S and U.K govts are also going through changes. The term limitation is one of many changes the CBN trying to introduce, so lets not get over ourselves and make it sound like this the ONLY change in the banking industry. Personally I am not familiar with the CBN/BOFI acts, again even the constitution is subject to change if needs be, so let not take these act as the bible, It is not cast in stone. a progressive mind ll want those act to be amendment as new developments are unveil, Just a reminder, Part of the CBN function is apart from money supply and controlling interest rate is to ensure that banks do not behave recklessly or fraudulently. The BOFI act relating to the CBN authority can be amendment. :)

Posted by Eccentrik on Jan 21 2010

@Nike ao I don't doubt that many CEOs and MDs of Nigerian banks have acted inappropriately. I simply do not understand why a 10-year term limit is supposed to be a solution. If someone steals then you deal with the problem by making stealing illegal or imposing penalties for theft. You do not deal with the possibility of theft by putting a time limit on how long a CEO can run a company. What if he's not a thief and he does a brilliant job, do you then chuck him after 10 years? Even if he's running the bank well? What stops the bank CEO from stealing twice as much as he normally would over that 10-year period? People shouldn't just applaud Sanusi because he came up with some idea without considering the consequences. Has he thought about how foreign investors will view government interference in banks that didn't request financial assistance and that are financially sound? Is this approach sensible?

Posted by Ade on Jan 22 2010

@Eccentrik. Nike is right to say that we are peculiar people. We need a harder stick than elsewhere. Obama now wants to flog Wall Street with 30cm plastic ruler because they have other ways of punishing offenders. We need Sanusi's koboko because our offenders get national honours. Some even become godfathers of political parties. Imagine Bode Goerge now in Kirikiri or wherever 'blessed' with a PhD from Ladoke akintola Uni and Alao Akala, a man installed by the late crook Adedibu also Dr Akala PhD. Now to the point. It is becoming more necessary for governments all over the world to take measures to forestall future occurrence of the financial disaster we find our world. The Massachusettes defeat of the Democratic candidate in USA has forced President Obama to take action on Wall Street after foot dragging for a year even though there is nothing in the laws of capitalist America to regulate or micromanage Wall Street. Result -banking shares are beginning to take a dive around the world. Whether well thought out or not, Sanusi is not alone in this. Obama, Alestair Darling, Gordon Brown are all into this micromanaging. We need drastic actions now to deal with our problems. Unlike in the western world where people make money by cutting risky deals, our executives make money in ways that require jail terms. Those who did similar things are in jail now. If anyone knows Lord Conrad Black - the entrepreneur and media mogul is in jail for swindling shareholders in his Hollinger International media empire and for obstruction of justice. The obstruction of justice count related to the removal of 13 boxes which could have contained evidence for his prosecution from his office. Watch what will happen with the 'big boys' who have been given till July to clean up their acts. Nobody will go to jail for obstruction of justice and destroying evidence. Until we get to that level of transparency in Ngr, we need the 'Sanusitization' (radical decisions which may not be in line with the books but are morally justified). If you talk about morals, the government of USA and UK have no legal backing or right to block the bonuses of bankers but they are doing so on moral grounds due to public outcry. In fact America is upset with Obama now and want him to do something about executive compensation. It may not sound right because those are private institutions but it is being done on moral grounds.

Posted by ma on Jan 26 2010

Anikulakpo u r a small minded rat, i wonder id u r even educated



post a comment

Your name: *



* = Required information