Lead Image

IMHOTEP: The sins of our fathers

Print print Email email Share Share


My old man recently turned ninety-three. Father never married until he was well past forty. Mother was an extremely attractive eighteen year-old. I wouldn’t know what she saw in the aging Socrates. But it was a wedding made in heaven. As a young man, father worked with the white missionaries of the Sudan United Mission (SUM) who toiled in the vineyards of the old Plateau, Bauchi and Benue Provinces. A maternal uncle only recently told me something I would never have known. When father was a young bachelor he started gathering an impressive collection of books.

Whenever anyone asked to borrow he would flatly refuse. He insisted that he was building a library for his son.

Unbeknownst to anyone, father had made an Abrahamic Covenant that his first child shall be a son. And he had vowed that he would dedicate him to the Lord and would live a life untainted by alcohol, tobacco, drugs or sexual immorality.

It was my good fortune to have come into this world as a child of covenant; a prize which I am told comes with certain infallible promises. Father is also the kindest man I have ever met - generous to a fault - and absolutely without guile. He has never treated anyone on the basis of religion, ethnicity or race. He would be the first to come to the help of his worst enemy - if he had any. It was at a certain stage in my intellectual development, when I was immersing myself in studies of Greek philosophy, that I fully appreciated where father stood in the ranks of sages.

But he is no saint. He nearly smacked an electoral officer with the end of his walking stick during the 2007 elections when the man tried to dictate to him where he should cast his vote. Without a doubt, father has gone through his own trials and temptations. And he may have fallen short in certain areas.

We weave a lot of myths around our fathers, just as nations do theirs. In America, there is a surreal aura surrounding ‘Founding Fathers’ such as George Washington, John Quincy Adams, Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. It does not matter that some of these White Anglo-Saxon Protestant males were slave drivers who raped black women. Nations of course need their myths; idealisations that serve to hold fragile societies together.

We in Nigeria have also many false myths about our Founding Fathers. I have explained elsewhere how I thought Obafemi Awolowo failed as a politician. For all that has been said about him,

Nnamdi Azikiwe was quite a shallow thinker who was much given to flippant displays. And both were avaricious. I honestly believe that the future of our democracy requires some irreverent critique so that we can rebuild our republic on the foundations of a just and lasting peace instead of deceitful iconology.

Recently, an impressive 5 billion naira was raised for the Ahmadu Bello Foundation. The late premier of the North has been eulogised in superlative terms as a leader without equal. That may well be so. But we cannot overlook the little difficulties he had over the management of Sokoto Native Authority funds when he was a civil servant. The idea of One Nigeria was probably an alien abstraction to him.

If I were looking for the ideal of what Tony Kirk-Greene of Oxford University terms ‘mutmin kirki’, I would look to Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa rather than to Gamji. Justin Tseayo and the late Paul Logams have shown how Middle Belt peoples were for the most part mere pawns under the Sardauna in his effort to enhance his power base in the competitive regionalism that Dame Margery Perham termed the fragile Nigerian ‘tripod’. And they got nothing out of it -- neither industries nor development nor self-respect.

From my father’s generation to ours, this hypocrisy has continued to prevail. Chief Solomon Lar recently raised the matter in a fascinating media interview. Predictably, the response has been a withering silence - a brick wall of silence that speaks volumes.

The truth is that the idea of a single, monolithic, North rings increasingly hollow by the day. The millions of the youths of the Middle Belt do not think it exists; and they have been given no reason to feel otherwise. And their disenchantment is reaching heartbreaking proportions.

Every generation, according to the political philosopher Hannah Arendt, “is burdened by the sins of the fathers as it is blessed with the deeds of the ancestors”. In my view, we can only assuage this historic burden if we genuinely speak truth to ourselves, atoning for the sins of our fathers and resolving to live in genuine equality, mutual respect, justice and honour.

Back
Dear Reader.
While we value your feedback we may block inappropriate comment. Please feel free to respond to new comments. Note also that 234NEXT bears no responsibility for what readers post and is not liable for any form of impersonation.

Reader Comments (11)


Posted by paquito bites on Nov 02 2009

an eloquent piece that belongs in the land of the dreamers.in the real world,unfortunately it is the distortions and misintepretations of history that holds sway in justifying the deeds of both the fathers and the rulers or for that matter the leaders. from the article,i take it that the writer is from the middle belt.my knowledge of nigerian history,i must confess is scanty,but is the marginalisation of the middle belt not got something to do with religion?. could the hegemony of the hausa/fulani in the north not create the discomfort and disquiet that prevails in the middle belt where the christain beliefs are held quite highly. that the youth of the middle belt feel disenchanted is surely a situation that prevails nationwide ,apropos to the niger delta and the recent events in the deep north. you are quite right that we need to live in harmony with mutual respect etc but then where goes realpolitik. presently the nigerian polity is devoid of the virtues you ascribe to and all indications are that we will not get there anytime soon. there is no harm in dreaming but we will need an awful lot of education and political emancipation to arrive at the nirvana that you deservedly seek.

Posted by TATA on Nov 02 2009

Young man you praise your father and insult other people's fathers, that does not show good breeding and upbringing. Place the three personages side by side or on the same scale and look again...benjamin azikiwe, jeremiah awolowo and your father... azikiwe "a shallow thinker given to flippant displays and avaricious" awolowo... "avaricious" your father...book collector, teetotaler, does not smoke or engage in sexual immorality and a sage....CONGRATULATIONS, YOUR FATHER WOULD BE PROUD OF YOU WHEN HE READS THIS, YOU HAVE NOW MENTIONED HIS NAME ALONG WITH THESE NO GOODS....I have a feeling that might be his greatest achievement on earth apart from fathering you. This is what is known as abuse of privilege...the privilege to write a column...does not give you the right to engage in auto masturbation...

Posted by paquito bites on Nov 02 2009

@tata,easy on the insults obadiah seems a decent fellow.please make your point without the vituperation.thanking you in advance.

Posted by Philemon Adjekuko on Nov 02 2009

If the Nigeria we have today is the product of the so called founding fathers, what further testimony does any one need to reach a conclusion as to the kind of foundation they laid.

Posted by okinba launko on Nov 02 2009

Tata, from the little igbo i understand tat is an affectionate name for a child, however, i know you're not a child and with your comments I'm not sure you're a very affectionate person. Your diatribe against Obadiah is uncalled for! He has raised some talking points about the perception we collectively hold of our nation's founding fathers and expressed his opinion of their shortcomings. the best we can do is discuss those points to determine if at all they are valid and learn to identify these points in our present day leaders. I believe you're an intelligent individual, you don't do yourself any favours with your reaction to this piece

Posted by mad nigerian on Nov 02 2009

A rather odd look into our history.But,our problem as a nation is that we stand by and look at theives stealing and then we defend them.

Posted by james on Nov 02 2009

i really appriciat your commet on page 4 well its all about comittiment.

Posted by TATA on Nov 02 2009

@ okinba..he could have expressed his perception about zik, awo, and bello, without juxtaposing his father...the first three are dead and lived public lives with which you can assess them...the moment he brought in his personal situation, he destroyed the right to be respected...if you do not get that....try this I am insulting his father on behalf of awo, zik and bello....who are dead and cannot defend themselves...

Posted by paquito bites on Nov 03 2009

@tata.sir did we read the same article?.he was not comparing his father with the late statemen.no,he used his father as an introduction to the main article.his opinion of zik,awo and bello are exactly that,personal views.surely our personal views should not call for insults. on the contrary,they should elicit debate and exchange of views. i follow your blogs which i find fun to read.i'm afraid,my friend ,you overstepped the mark on this one. lets have fun when we keep it civil and entertaining,don't you think?!!!.

Posted by enigma on Nov 03 2009

@Mr. Paquito you sound so intelligent that i'm compelled to write thus: nice one bro. @tata Please its very neccesary not to be this fat at conclusions. Thank you.

Posted by Babs Dodo on Nov 07 2009

Mr. O. Mailafia, I did not understand your article fully. If you want to write about your old man and his good deeds, write that; if you want to write about the three late statemen and their failings, write it and if you want to write about the oppression of the middle belters, go to the point. I sympathise with the Middle Belt people so you could have dedicated the whole article on the challenges you face in the north rather than bringing in some red herring.



post a comment

Your name: *



* = Required information