Lead Image

IMHOTEP: The dragon and the sphinx

Print print Email email Share Share


“Let China sleep, for when she wakes, the earth will tremble”. So said Napoleon Bonaparte. When I was a student in Paris over two decades ago, I had a rather eccentric Chinese friend by the name of Liu. Then as now, Paris was the fashion capital of the world, with many of my African brethren more obsessed with following up on haute couture in the shopping malls of Montparnasse and La Defence than anything else.

Liu was a high-flying member of the youth wing of the Chinese Communist Party. He was quiet, studious and reserved and excessively bright. He vowed that he would never buy even a handkerchief in France. I asked him why, and he replied that they in China were in the process of constructing the greatest nation on earth and everything he did within and outside his fatherland must contribute to that single goal.

That was in the spring of 1985. To be completely honest, I suspected Liu to be just another communist crackpot. It took me the better part of a decade to grasp the full import of what he meant. On October 1, China celebrated sixty years of Communist rule. They have been years of sweat, blood and tears -- from Mao’s bloody ‘cultural revolution’ to the massacres at Tiananmen Square.

The Middle Kingdom remains the oldest surviving civilization on earth, with five millenniums of history behind it.

The secret of that remarkable endurance lies in the country’s inherent capacity for self-regeneration; it’s tradition of respect for excellence, its scholasticism and the pragmatism of its leaders.

Today, the country is the second largest economy in the world (measured by purchasing power parity),

with external reserves of nearly $US2 trillion. Chinese economic growth has been one of the most dazzling achievements in world economics, at an unprecedented annualized average of 15 percent between 1985 and 2004.

As fate would have it, China’s man of destiny after Mao was a little chain-smoking philosopher-king by the name of Deng Xiaoping; a pragmatist who preached that “it is glorious to be rich”. He also famously declared that “it does not matter whether a cat is black or white, so long as it can catch mice”.

Deng’s reforms were anchored, first, on the liberation of the rural peasantry by the dismantling of farm collectives. Agricultural modernisation was linked to a coherent strategy of industrialisation. Some of the Chinese leaders visited Singapore and took copious notes on what they saw. They also found inspiration from neighbouring Taiwan and South Korea.

A so-called ‘coastal strategy’ led to the creation of special economic zones in such areas as Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Xiamen and Shantou. There was also a deliberate policy to welcome foreign direct investment. Banking reforms were also implemented while pork-barrelled state enterprises were dismantled.

The tax regime was modernised while trade policy was overhauled. Money began flowing in, much of it initially from Diaspora Chinese investors who controlled between them capital in excess of US$1 trillion. The impact was stupendous.

From 1980 to 2004, the gross national product increased seven-fold while per capita incomes doubled, with savings increasing by an astonishing 14,000 percent. Exports rose from a paltry US$10 billion in 1980 to over US$2.5 trillion in 2008.

The African Sphinx has a lot to learn from the Chinese Dragon. But we must be as wily as serpents in our dealings with the Dragon. Sino-African relations date back to medieval times, when Chinese ships arrived the East African coast as early as the fourteenth century. Their mission was scientific and commercial, unlike the Europeans and the Arabs whose sole aim was rapine and pillage. Today, China has virtually overtaken the West as the main donor to Africa, with an ODA of US$20 billion per annum.

China-Africa trade stood at US$107 billion in 2008.

In his address to our National Assembly during his state visit last year, President Hu Jintao declared: “Africa has rich resources and market potentials, whereas China has available effective practices and practical know-how it has gained in the course of modernisation”. And so it is. But I would insist that if our relations have no moral content at all, we would ultimately only reap the whirlwind.

There are many aspects of Chinese business practices that give us cause for worry, notably the dumping of substandard and even dangerous products on our Mother Continent.

Chinese companies have also been known to treat their African workers with savagery. They are also totally amoral where oil and other strategic natural resources are concerned. Increased policy dialogue with the Dragon is therefore crucial to ensuring that we safeguard our sovereignty, our equality, our mutually shared obligations and the dignity of our people.

Over to you, Liu.

Back
Dear Reader.
While we value your feedback we may block inappropriate comment. Please feel free to respond to new comments. Note also that 234NEXT bears no responsibility for what readers post and is not liable for any form of impersonation.

Reader Comments (5)


Posted by TATA on Oct 19 2009

and our man mailafia applied all these life experiences and knowledge while he was at cbn...that is why we are still where we were...abeg your name betrays you mai lafia... "safeguard our sovereignty, our equality, our mutually shared obligations and the dignity of our people." u don ever hear dat grammar, a beggar has no choice?

Posted by paquito bites on Oct 19 2009

sir,as an aside,your african brethen seemed to have got the wrong end of the stick if they sought their fashion in la defense!!.surely it should be at least 8th arr.no matter. the african sphinx as you called nigeria would have followed a similar fashion if it were not for the disconnect between the rulers and the ruled.as you will note i did not mention leadership.that is a concept that still deludes us. we could be a mini china,if we don't spend too much time choosing the head of the customs service with false qualifications rather than finding ways to clear containers in days than months. we could be a mini china if our banks funded the tremendous enterprise in the nation rather than turn to unregulated casinos. we could be a mini china if we followed the regional system,one that the northern governors are presently celebrating under the great sarduna banner rather than the blood sucking states that are sustained by handouts and devoid of simple economic othordoxy.for example ,think of the power of industrial agriculture and the mouths to feed. we could be a mini china if our roads were easier and safer to ply in order to distribute goods within the states and thus reducing the level of spoilage. we need'nt go on,it gets boring. at least if our african brethen looked for the haute couture in the right arrondisement,that will be the right start.

Posted by Consi & Casso on Oct 19 2009

You just put into relevant local details a particular section of Macchiavelli's The Prince. How princes must run their estate. However, we have no princes, and nobody is listening. If a low cost housing unit built by the government is 3.5 million naira, is it low cost? Can they not use mud to make a 100, 000 housing units on their own grounds complete with flowers and cheap power? Any Nigerian that lives in a 3-bedroom mud house for two year will be on his way out of the accomodation, and on his way to a better life..the sphinx was made of mud!

Posted by Consi & Casso on Oct 19 2009

You just put into relevant local details a particular section of Macchiavelli's The Prince. How princes must run their estate. However, we have no princes, and nobody is listening. If a low cost housing unit built by the government is 3.5 million naira, is it low cost? Can they not use mud to make a 100, 000 housing units on their own grounds complete with flowers and cheap power? Any Nigerian that lives in a 3-bedroom mud house for two year will be on his way out of the accomodation, and on his way to a better life..the sphinx was made of mud!

Posted by Philip Ikita on Oct 19 2009

This is a good perpective on the Chinese development journey. But i do not think it is the fault of the Chinese that substandard goods continue to be dumped on Nigeria (or Africa). It is our fault. I lived in a small Asian island for upwards of a year and most of Sri Lanka's standard goods and products of technology came from China. What is the job of the standards organization of Nigeria (SON)? I identify with Mailafia's fears that we may just "reap the whirlwind" if we fail to map out a strategy that will ensure benefits for Nigeria. The onus is on us, and on or leaders especially.



post a comment

Your name: *



* = Required information