Silverbird Showtime, an eight-screen cinema facility in Port Harcourt, is to be developed over a 2km radius to include a high-rise hotel, a helipad and a theme park. Photo: RUONA AGBROKO

Silverbird caught in Rivers demolition scandal

Print print Email email Share Share


Ben Murray-Bruce, founder of the Silverbird Group, has absolved his organisation of any responsibility in the large-scale demolitions in Njemanze and Abonnema Wharf, both waterfront properties in Port Harcourt, Rivers State.

The United Nations Agency for human settlements, UN-HABITAT, had issued a statement to the effect that the demolitions were “motivated by the Silverbird Showtime project, with several commercial developments.” The agency also estimates that about 45,000 people will be affected by the demolitions, which began in February 10, 2009, despite court rulings asking for a halt in the process to allow for proper deliberation.

Speaking in a telephone interview with NEXT, on Thursday, Mr. Murray-Bruce said, “I don’t have any comments on that. That is a strictly government affair. I don’t have any comment to make on the demolition. I am not involved in that, I think it’s the commissioner for Urban development.” The Silverbird Showtime project, besides the cinema, would reportedly include an international conference center, a shopping mall, high-rise hotel and a helipad. In addition, a leisure park and children’s theme park are to be developed.

About the MOU

The implementation of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) signed on January 24, 2008 between the Silverbird Group and the Rivers State government has drawn mixed feelings from civil rights groups and residents of the communities.

C.W. Enwefah, the secretary-general of the National Union of Tenants of Nigeria took issue with what he called a “vague” part of the MOU that claimed there would be “ ‘an urban renewal programme within a radius of 2 km of the project site.’ “The MOU reads that Bruce and some undisclosed partners will receive 80 percent of the gains of the Silverbird project, while the state government that is now displacing thousands of residents will take just 20% and this is to last for 99 years. It’s never for the purpose of urban renewal,” he said.

Apart from Njemanze and Abonnema Wharf, “Akiziwe, Iloabuchi and Ojoto streets, Isaac Boro Park, Education Bus Stop have to disappear,” according to the UN-HABITAT report “because they are within the area required for expansion of existing roads to provide access to the Silverbird project site, while buildings in Isaac Boro Park and Education Bus Stop will have to make way for the children theme park.”

Corroborating a portion of the MOU which states that the Rivers State government would “provide basic services such as necessary access roads and safe neighbourhood buffer zone,” Johnson Falade, Habitat Programme Manager, Nigeria for UN-HABITAT, told NEXT in a recent interview that; “We gathered from other sources that some of these demolitions were coming as a result of this partnership and that they would not want to see those ramshackle structures that are around those waterfront areas.” Datubo West, a resident, is upset at the government for demolishing “a cultural icon like the Obi Wali Cultural Centre”, on which the Silverbird Showtime Cinema has since been built.

In Silverbird’s defence, the entertainment chain asked the Rivers State government to deliver the property to Silverbird “absolutely free of all encumbrances and ensure that potential issues of absentee landlords are identified and eliminated (...) and ensure that all impediments on the property that may hinder the execution of the project are eliminated”.

The organisation had also given the government a caveat to “ensure the peaceful evacuation and relocation of present occupants (...). The means of relocation shall be such as is legally acceptable and accords with due process with a view to avoiding impinging on the reputation of Silverbird in future”.

However, when NEXT tried to remind Mr. Murray-Bruce of these points, he was quite blunt; “Look, I need an environment to do business. It is government’s responsibility to create the enabling environment for us to do any kind of business in that area, so it’s the government responsibility... So really, they have to respond to the issues, not me.”

Still, civil rights groups such as Amnesty International and UN-HABITAT have reiterated calls for genuine inclusion and relocation of residents being affected by the demolitions. The UN-HABITAT’s report, titled “Evictions and Demolitions in Port Harcourt: Report of Fact-Finding Mission to Port-Harcourt City, Federal Republic Of Nigeria 12-16 March 2009” has gone further to pick holes in the Silverbird-Rivers State government MOU.

“It is worth noting that the public private partnership arrangement between the Silverbird Group Ltd. and the RSG is based on private-sector business practices,” page 50 of the report stated.

“Silverbird’s contribution to the equity shareholding is 80 per cent, or NGN 16 billion (USD 110 million) for the construction; RSG contributes 20 per cent in the form of the required land property and a payment of NGN 200 million (USD 1.38 million) to Silverbird as contribution to the building and operation of [a] children’s theme park.” The report also revealed that; ‘The parties agreed that Silverbird is entitled to defray all its costs and expenses related to the construction of the Project from the (generated) income (...) after which profits will be shared in the proportion of its equity shareholding (...).’

But in spite of formidable opposition, the demolitions continue, and critics are certain that out of the debris of the lives, homes and sweat of thousands, will rise yet another outpost of an already successful business empire.

Back
Dear Reader.
While we value your feedback we may block inappropriate comment. Please feel free to respond to new comments. Note also that 234NEXT bears no responsibility for what readers post and is not liable for any form of impersonation.

Reader Comments (27)


Posted by Anjibobo on Sep 12 2009

This doesn't sound very good for Ben Bruce. It is possible for him to build all his 'play places' without affecting the lives of common people. This sounds unconscionable. He should know he has a reputation to protect and should work to help the masses and not be one of those who are adding to their problem. Shame on him!

Posted by Michael Ijere on Sep 12 2009

THE TRUTH IS THAT THE WATERFRONT HAS BEEN GROSSLY DILAPIDATED,HYGENEICALLY DEGRADED AND CRIME INFESTED AND OVERDUE FOR REDEVELOPMENT, HOWEVER THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD GIVE CONSIDERATION TO MASS AND MEDIUM INCOME HOUSING IN THEIR REDEVELOPMENT

Posted by nurujay on Sep 12 2009

"shame on him" why? He has clearly stated (in his own acerbic way) that he's not responsible for relocating the people, the rivers state government is. Anyone dong business in Nigeria on development projects such as the galleria, showtime or the entertainment center has to get involved in letting government to do their job of providing an enabling environment for investment. In the agreement Rivers state was supposed to relocate these people. Investigate deeper and you may find that money meant for relocating these folks may have never been approved or if approved it may be "held up" by beaureaucratic red tape, corrupt officials, or even militants acting as middlemen. Rivers is too volatile for a businessman to try handling relocation issues.

Posted by Oluwole on Sep 12 2009

Another example of authority stealing, Ben Bruce using NTA's stolen funds to steal peoples' land for a purely commercial project.

Posted by laja akinniyi on Sep 13 2009

It is the job of the Government to create an enabling enviroment for business to florish.Hence,it is my suggestion that River state government should expedite action in well-planned and wholly implemented exercise of relocation.It is part of the sacrifice to pay for development and nation building

Posted by laja akinniyi on Sep 13 2009

Which is preferable,wealth creation through deployment of existing resources or continous existence of such moribund facilities to satisfy sentiments?

Posted by Dayo on Sep 13 2009

So instead of the so-called UN-Habitat and Amnesty Intl to work with the RSG to ensure that these people are relocated to better housing, they are busy fighting to retain and perpetuate slums and slum-living?!

Posted by Dayo on Sep 13 2009

@ Oluwole: which NTA money?! The Murray-Bruces have been running the Dominoes chain and dominating entertainment in Nigeria probably before NTA heard of color TV. However, most of the money for the Silverbird Galleria and Silverbird's expansion across Nigeria and Africa came from bank financing. It's unfortunate to witness these days that virtually every successful Nigerian is immediately classified as corrupt.

Posted by Philip Ikita on Sep 13 2009

Call it redevelopment, urban renewal or whatever: Change has got to come somehow sometime on the waterfront dwellers of Port Harcourt. The must important issue is to INVOLVE the people and work out the process with the people. In other climes, adequate compensation would be paid, new settlements would be built. Our problem is we rush destitutes and people living in poverty into worse destitution and worse poverty in the name of development.

Posted by RASTAMAN on Sep 13 2009

shame on u bruce!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by 'Muyiwa Adeniyi on Sep 13 2009

We all love to use developed countries of the world as reference points without accepting the fact that some of these so-called developments came at a price. A very good example is in London where I reside; thousands of people and businesses were moved or displaced (some against their wishes) to give room for the on-going Olympic Village project for 2012 Olympics. From the computer generated-image of the project, these displacements would enhance the environment and create better standard of living. Provided the River state government adequately compensate the affected residents, transforming a slum into a 21st century environment should attract accolades. Dubai is a very good example.

Posted by Tatafo on Sep 13 2009

@Muyiwa...."Provided the River state government adequately compensate the affected residents." That is the point of the foreigners, shame it took the soreigners to bring this to our notice

Posted by Wesley on Sep 13 2009

Before we jump to conclusions as to the culpability of Silverbird, it is pertinent we ask certain questions (1) What is the state of the waterfront today? is it habitable as-is or it needs re-development (2) what is the role of government under a PPP arrangement (3) Who owns the waterfront? the Rivers state govt or the dwellers? (4) and if the dwellers, do they have the necessary papers (i.e C of O) to the land? NEXt needs to go to Orile & Lekki and see what the Lagos State Govt is doing...certainly painful at first seeing the large scale demolitions across the length of both roads. But Lagosians aren't complaining (albeit too loudly) cos we can see the vision of the Lagos state govt. NEXT please be more balanced in your reporting... It wouldn't have cost anything to get the views of the RVSG. Now only God knows the damage (or possibly good) your reporting may have cost..

Posted by Olufemi C. on Sep 13 2009

RSG please play your part and stop causing confusion and hardship. Silverbird continue playing your part but insist RSG plays theirs too. Anjibobo- I doubt you have any authentic information about the structure of the Silverbird deal with RSG. Silverbird has played its part remarkably well. It would be wise to make sure of your facts before pointing fingers. If you have ever been as successful as having a deal with governments in Nigeria (excerpt Lagos State), you will better understand who the shame goes to. Oluwole- I've heard people make statements like this before, but I never cease to marvel at the level of ignorance at play when such claims are made. Where you an NTA auditor? Have you even been in PortHarcourt before to even have an idea of what is happening.

Posted by tunde bello on Sep 14 2009

Nigerians never learn! Who stole NTA money? Where was NTA money kept? have we been to this place we are talking about in Rivers State? What was the benefit of Obi wali cultural center before what we now called the Silver bird cinemas? what exactly is UN-HABITAT talking about? do they have any report on the living conditions of these people before now? has any of the loud mouths talking about shame on Ben Bruce driven around Obi Wali center before now and tell us what it used to be? please, people should see down and let us reason. Relocation? fine! but who does it? the business man who will spend 6billion naira? please try and set up your own!

Posted by Anjibobo on Sep 14 2009

@Olufemi C The point is this: being that Ben Bruce had so far created a reputation for his organizations of being serious business concerns, he ought to have gone beyond board to make sure that the RSG would adequately relocate the people so that what is now happening would have been avoided, and wouldn't come back to tarnish his image as is now happening. He ought to have insisted that if the RSG did not successfully accomplish the relocation, he would not proceed with the development. Because his reputation ought to have been worth that much to him. Your brand, your name is an intangible asset that most people or businesses don't realize have to be protected even at the cost sometimes of 'turning money away' or walking away from a deal. I say this in Ben Bruce's case because as far as Nigerian businessmen go, he is one of the few whom I have(had?) a positive opinion of. He has had a history so far of creating real, productive economic concerns and this should be encouraged and he should continue to do so with the highest sense of business ethics. So, this was the cause of my expressing disappointment with him. Had it been some other businessman, I wouldn't have bothered.

Posted by JTBells on Sep 14 2009

Shame 2 Oluwole and Rastaman.People lyk u r worse than the Government we complain about. That's because you swallow everything you hear like you can't spare a minute to think for yourself or ask a bit more questions. Shame 2 RSG if it does not involve the waterfront inhabitants in their eventual relocation. THUMBS UP 2 GREAT MEN LYK BEN BRUCE.

Posted by Bruce UGIOMOH on Sep 14 2009

Events like this will prolong militancy in Rivers State. The water front is a den eh? One could have thought that these slum dwellers were provided an alternative abode to justify the development of the so called water front which the RSG have given away for just 20 per cent. What would it profit a man to gain the entire water front, sorry, the world and loose his/her soul. Think about it.

Posted by Ibrahim Dikko, Scotland. on Sep 18 2009

This does not sound good but the development that is going to be developed will certainly enhanced the living condition of the people as well as generate new opportunities. My hope is that the RSG should properly compensate it citizens and this should be done as quickly as possible to reduce their suffering. Project development is never without its own problems. Good luck to all those concerned.

Posted by freeman pius on Sep 24 2009

i think the government is using this demolition to defraud the state,the commissioner said he had used 800 million for compensation but the governor said he has used 4 billion who is fooling who with our Rivers money. The Rivers money belong to both the poor and the rich, and not those in government to punish the poor. They should that hell and heaven is real .

Posted by payoski-PortHarcourt. on Sep 24 2009

The so-call rich in Rivers state are cowards they are speechless because of little recognition, i think they will die again in their graves since they canot call the governor to order.He disobey court order to stop demoiltion from a high court yet the same court at the highest level collected bribe and install him, shame to Nigerian democracy and they claim power came from god,i know the real God will chase them out one day.

Posted by freeman pius on Sep 24 2009

i think the government is using this demolition to defraud the state,the commissioner said he had used 800 million for compensation but the governor said he has used 4 billion who is fooling who with our Rivers money. The Rivers money belong to both the poor and the rich, and not those in government to punish the poor. They should know that hell and heaven is realand one day they will account properly for those billions.

Posted by Tony on Oct 05 2009

The truth about d whole thing is dat govt should compensate d affect people in waterfront n ensure dat d möney gets t d right people affectd

Posted by Malice on Apr 30 2010

I hope Silverbird did not plant posters in this forum? Why the heat. After all, all this money could not have come from Domino stores. And bank financing is a term frequently used to disguise laundered money. Anyway, the Bruces are progressive in their use of stolen money. At least they are ploughing it back into the community, even if at a hugh profit to themselves.



post a comment

Your name: *



* = Required information