Lead Image

Speaker, House Of Representatives, Dimeji Bankole Photo: NAN

A House of under-performing representatives

Print print Email email Share Share


Less than 26 percent of the 360 members of the Nigerian House of Representatives have sponsored at least one bill since June 5, 2007, when the House was inaugurated, a recently released mid-term report of the House has shown. Altogether, the federal lawmakers sponsored 221 bills in the last two years, with contributions from just 93 members.

The 41-page report, prepared by the committee on Rules and Business, also shows that 271 bills were introduced into the House during the same period. Of this number, 50 were passed into law. About 46 of the bills were executive bills and four others came from the Senate for concurrence.

House Leader, Tunde Akogun and Mayor Eze (PDP, Imo) lead the pack of bills sponsors, with eight bills each. Herman Hembe (PDP, Benue) and John Halims Agoda (PDP, Delta) come next with seven bills each. Kayode Amusan (PDP, Ogun), Uzoma Nkem-Abonta (PDP, Abia) and Fancy Arole (AC, Lagos) sponsored six bills each. Henry Dickson (PDP, Bayelsa), Oluwole Oke (PDP, Osun), Ita Enang (PDP, Akwa Ibom) and Etim Bassey sponsored five bills each.

Four bills each came from Darlington Okeke, Nkiruka Onjejiocha, Gbenga Makanjuola, Lanre Agoro, Samson Osagie, Cyril Maduabum, while three each were sponsored by Akinderu Fatai, Attai Aidoko, Femi Gbajabiamila and Abike Dabiri-Erewa. The remaining lawmakers brought one or two bills each. Speaker of the House, Dimeji Bankole and his predecessor, Patricia Etteh have only one bill each credited to them. Mr. Bankole's deputy, Usman Bayero Nafada did not sponsor any bill. The bill sponsored by Mr. Bankole is titled "National Office of Government Performance, Auditor and Accountability Bill, 2008", which is currently awaiting second reading.

Mrs. Etteh's bill was "Maternal New Born and Child Welfare Health Services Bill, 2007". It is yet to be reported out of committee to which it was committed. Some of the bills already passed were forwarded to President Umaru Yar'Adua for his assent; while the others are either in the Senate for concurrence or at various stages of legislation in the lower chamber. However, nine others have been concluded in the Committee of Whole but do not have clean copies yet.

A lot of motion

The Representatives appear to have done better in the area of motions. A total of 84 members brought motions between June 2007 and June 2009. Interestingly, some of those who sponsored bills also registered their names in this area.

However, Minority Leader, Mohammed Ali Ndume from Borno State comes top with nine motions. Dino Melaye (PDP, Kogi) has eight; Mr. Agoda 7; Festus Adegoke 4; and Gbenga Oduwaiye 3. Mr. Enang, Patrick Obahiagbon, Mohammed Sani Abdu, John Eno, Samson Osagie, Fancy Arole, Friday Itulah, Aliyu Wadada, abdullahi Farouk, Abike Dabiri-Erewa, Farouk Lawan, Patrick Ikhariale have two motions to their credit. About 58 others sponsored one motion each.

This means that the remaining members are merely collecting huge salaries and allowances for doing nothing. Each member of the House, according to the current pay package prepared by the Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission takes home ₦1,985,212.50 and ₦29,280,684.22 as allowances annually.

The allowances include accommodation, vehicle loan, furniture, ward robe, vehicle maintenance, entertainment, recess, constituency, personal assistant, domestic staff, utility, severance, newspaper and house maintenance. Each member is also entitled to ₦21,000 duty tour allowance and $550 estacode per night.

Mr. Bankole and Mr. Nafada are on an annual basic salary of ₦2,477,110.00 and ₦2,287,034.25 respectively. Allowances for both the Speaker and the deputy are ₦9,784,384.00 and ₦8,004,280.00. These figures are from recess, constituency, and severance allowances alone as the state provides for the rest. The Speaker is entitled to a duty tour allowance of ₦35,000 and estacode of $1,000 per night while the deputy speaker takes ₦30,000 and $750.

The salaries and allowances are being reviewed by RMAFC as directed by Mr. Yar'Adua.

However, there are also reports that the lawmakers get illegal allowances in the region of ₦35 million each, quarterly.

The lawmakers also maintained legislative aides who are hired to help them carry out their duties. Each of them is entitled to five aides. The sum of ₦4.3 billion was initially appropriated for these aides in 2009 Budget but was raised by the lawmakers to ₦4.7 billion while working on the budget. It was learnt that some of the lawmakers pocket most of the funds meant for the aides while a few others employ less than five.

Poor performance

On several occasions, Mr. Bankole had warned members to get serious with their work. In February this year, the Speaker lashed out at the members over their poor performance. Twice in May last year, he also expressed regrets over the poor attitude of the members to work following the level of their absence from sittings. He warned that performance would henceforth determine their placement in the standing committees.

Statistics coming from the register, which members sign before they go in for plenary session, show that three of them were habitual absentees during the period.

Adiche Uche of the Centre for Democratic Success said it was not surprising that only about 30 percent of the members sponsored bill in the last two years. He said most of them did not prepare for the task, having been fraudulently elected.

"I am not surprised, considering the manner many of them were elected into the House," he said. "You know as well as I do that some, definitely not all I must say, are here for what they will put in their pockets and they don't care if Nigerians and Nigeria suffer for this."

Mr. Uche said that the remaining two years would be worse than the previous years because of the lawmakers' desperation to get re-elected. "Where will they have the time to settle down to work on bills when they are running around to work for their return?" he asked.

Igo Aguma (PDP, Rivers State), said the high turn-over of parliamentarians affect its productivity. Speaking on the recent celebration of the 10th anniversary of unbroken democracy in the country, Mr. Aguma said the best brains always leave the House at the end of every session.

"The turn-over of members is not only limited to PDP," he said. "All other parties have the same problem. People are used as a tool."

But House spokesman, Eseme Eyiboh, said the years ahead will be brighter, adding, however, that it is wrong to assess the House based on the quantity of the bills passed. He insisted that the House should be judged based on the quality or contents of the bills.

"It is not the ratio of the sponsorship. Legislative business is a collaborative thing," he said. "So, if you look at the ratio, you may not be able to get it right."

Mr. Eyiboh said the British House of Commons, which is the oldest legislature in the world, only passed four bills last year.

Mr. Enang, who is the Chairman of the House committee on Rules and Business, said whichever way the House is assessed, it did well. According to him, every member does not need to sponsor bills.

"We have done excellently well, given the number of bills, given the number of motions we have and oversight functions we carried out. It is not compulsory for everybody to sponsor bills," he said

He noted that his colleagues are working at the committee level to give Nigerians the best.

Spokesman of the Conference of Nigeria Political Parties, Osita Okechukwu, said although the number of people who sponsor bills in a parliament is not a drawback, the lawmakers are yet to make laws that would impact on the lives of the people.

"Passing executive bills is not the issue, because both the executive and legislator work together. Edmund Burke said the representation should be adjudged with how best it serves the common interest," he said.

League of sponsors

Tunde Akogun, Mayor Eze - eight bills each.

Herman Hembe, John Halims Agoda - seven bills each.

Kayode Amusan, Uzoma Nkem-Abonta, Fancy Arole - six bills each.

Henry Dickson, Oluwole Oke, Ita Enang, Etim Bassey - five bills each.

Darlington Okeke, Nkiruka Onjejiocha, Gbenga Makanjuola, Lanre Agoro, Samson Osagie, Cyril Maduabum - four bills each.

Akinderu Fatai, Attai Aidoko, Femi Gbajabiamila and Abike Dabiri-Erewa - three bills each.

Back
Dear reader.
While we value your feedback we have to moderate them, so your comments would appear in a maximum of one hour. Please feel free to return and read through again after another user may have replied to what you have said.
Please note that 234NEXT.com bears no responsibility for what readers post, and is not liable for any form of impersonation.

Reader Comments (6)


Posted by JEFFREY on Jul 04 2009

MONEY FOR NOTHING WITH NOTHING TO SHOW FOR IT ITS A COMPLETE RIP OFF AT TAX PAYERS EXPENCE WHILE ORDINARY NIGERIAN ARE STRUGGLING TO MEET A THREE SQUARE MEAL IN A DAY ITS A SHAME

Posted by Anie Udoh on Jul 04 2009

The membership of the House is too large. At most it should be about a third of the present collection. The terms of engagement should be on a part-time basis with a week or two weeks intensive continuous session every quarter.A sitting allowance only should be specified. The attendance rule should be strictly enforced with automatic expulsion of members who's attendance fall below a specified minimum. As much as the output of Bills passed may not be a sufficient benchmark for determining performance, 18.5% cannot pass for excellent performance, please.

Posted by kehinde on Jul 05 2009

it is no wonders why Nigerian econnomy is in shambles, Our leaders have no time to chart worthy course for the upiftment of our economy rather they have time for illigally enriching themselves at the expense of the masses. May God have mercy on us all.

Posted by Abiodun Giwa on Jul 06 2009

The tale about the wobbling state of productivity in Nigeria is age old. But it must worry us because it is having more than neccesary negative effect on the country's development. Let us begin with do nothing legislators. They are supposed to be leading by example. But so far, they are not better than the NEPA Engineers, who give blackout rather than give us light.One can be very sure that the same novious cancer that has gripped the legislators and the NEPA Engineers must have taken control of all the government Ministries and Parastatals and which effect is general slow down of the country's growth. Gone are the days when workers are made to work for their earnings.Each time I hear people talk about NEPA, I feel very sad because my country seems to have abandoned the normal process of employers and employees relationship. If I run a business and an employee is not performing to my satisfaction, he gets the boot for me to hire another fellow who is willing to do what I expect him to do: justify the money I pay him for working for me. i feel that if the government put the Engineers on notice of a month that they would lose their jobs if they cannot perform, the country would see a miracle in the generation of power. There must be Engineers looking for employment and they cannot get and some who already got are not proving to be capable. Let us sack them. But those who should do the sacking are themselves lackeys. There is a need for a total overhaul of the nation's work ethics. Let them come and see the way people work for their dollars in the United States. An employer reserves the right to fire an employee who is not meeting the demand. How can we get these legislators fired?

Posted by edet on Jul 06 2009

We should go for part-time members. What is paid to them is a national waste as the caliber of people there are greedy. How can someone compare us to British House of Common - on what basis is this comparison. UK is over 200 years ahead of us in the practice of democracy and at infancy you are comparing us to them - only confirms that we are semi illitrate on matters of leadership in government

Posted by Amaka Ubochi on Jul 09 2009

It seems to me u didnt quite get your facts right. reporting neds to be accurate or as near so as possible. given that these stats you stated wrongly were published by the house, one wonders if you can be relied upon for less verifiable information. improve



post a comment

Your name: *



* = Required information