Well, this is it

Print print Email email Share Share


As the movie shows, Michael Jackson desperately wanted to ‘come back from the dead’ – something that became, ironically, a fatal quest.

“There’s some serious genius sh*t going on down here,” one of the back up singers says about MJ at some point during the film, and the audience – witnesses to talent that the world is yet to see repeated – couldn’t agree more.

The film, This Is It, on his final days and final performances and released four months after Michael Jackson’s death, is part documentary-part musical concert - based on the rehearsals for his London stage performances scheduled for July.

He was genius

At its best, this film showed us an MJ we didn’t get to see often: one that was in control and held his own. From the sounds to the lights, MJ showed that he knew something about everything – but then, what does one expect from a man who became a genius before he was 18?

“You’ve got to let it simmer,” he would say to one. “Let it go up,” he would say to another. And his voice... it was a magnificent instrument, and he could do so much with it, making everyone’s job so much easier.

And they responded with hero worship. “Are you alright Michael?” They would ask, with overwhelming deference. “You know, cos Michael, we all just want to make sure that you are okay and you are fine.”

With this much sucking up going on while the cameras were rolling, one shudders to think how bad it got in other parts of the 120 hours of footage we didn’t get to see.

He wanted this badly

Unfortunately, Jackson needed someone who could have told him the truth: that he had to stop. He was maintaining a relentless, ferocious pace – and he was 50, and hadn’t performed in a while.

True, his vocal prowess was still incredible, but he obviously was too feeble for the things he had to do. Some songs had up to six parts, and he would, according to his voice coach, Dorian Holley - sing through all the parts rapid fire to show what he wanted - and then he was sparring with young guys in their 20s.

In the film, he once playfully complained that the crowd of adoring fans (question: how is it that so many macho young men fell so hopelessly in love with such an androgynous – some will say girly – man, suspected to sleep with boys?) was pushing him too far.

“I am saving my voice for the concert,” he said once when he managed to resist the temptation – too little, too late - to hit the high notes. Terribly ironic now – but it showed just how badly he wanted this; so much that he ignored the warnings of his gangly, increasingly sickly, frame.

And all that time, he was also being pumped with a cocktail of drugs – including “lethal levels” of the powerful anaesthetic, Propofol, which eventually killed him.

He was a good man

If anything, this film emphasises what many MJ admirers were convinced of: that he was a good person.

The way kind words slipped off his tongue, he either had to be one of the world’s most gracious, or he was the king - of manipulation. “God bless you,” he would say after giving an instruction. “I love you” is something singers say automatically to fans, but Michael said it with such with tenderness and feeling, that you could feel the love.

“Don’t worry,” he would say when someone missed something. “This is why we rehearse.” And when he once criticised, he quickly added, “And I said that with love – L-O-V-E.”

It is appropriate then that this film is as much about the guys that were part of the production as it was about him. The backup singers and the dancers, the production designers and lighting directors the percussionists and bassists – everyone was highlighted.

And what is remarkable is that they were all able to share in this glory without at all diminishing Michael.

He was the movie

And the film was a spectacle – of lights and sound and design and special effects - everything was just grand and electrifying.

According to the producer, Kenny Ortega, “We had new technology with video, costuming, lighting with sound, with pyrotechnics. I came to know very quickly that Michael liked things hotter, bigger, louder,” he said.

And Michael, the icing on the cake, was at home in the lavishness; the utter fabulousity. Everything about the actual performance rehearsals was perfect.

Unfortunately the same cannot be said for the two-hour film. There was so much footage that could have been manipulated to effect; there was so much richness that could have been made into a spell-binding movie.

But, whilst the cameramen did a yeoman’s job getting incredibly insightful footage from great angles, the producers, directors, and writers – such as there were – just let it all run on its own steam. There was no story and no theme; we just seemed to move from performance to performance.

If this film was about anyone else less magnificent, it would have been a punching bag for critics. But, thankfully, each time it began to drag and flag, MJ would come in with another electrifying performance – and the world would be alright again. So, at the end, this was only a world class concert, put on film.

Still, you might not be spellbound, but you would be greatly entertained anyway – so we still owe them gratitude for helping us share in those moments.

But he was not the same

All that having been said, something had definitely changed.

Yes, Michael’s energy was incredible and his voice nothing short of magical. The attention to detail was also inspiring in this generation of artists who want to become ‘great’ without doing the hard work that it involves (and hard work is perhaps Michael’s greatest legacy)... but something had changed.

His dancing still had the magic – but it was clearly uncoordinated. His moves were slower and his rhythm faltered more than once.

It all gave this writer a sense that if that comeback show had actually held, fans - at least critical fans – would have been disappointed. But, now viewed against the soft after-glow of death, it becomes an immortal thing. The genius is preserved just as we remember it.

Seen that way, we can say that the rehearsals WERE the performance: this was the King of Pop’s last stroke of genius. In that case, Michael – the master dancer - couldn’t have choreographed his death better.

Back
Dear Reader.
While we value your feedback we may block inappropriate comment. Please feel free to respond to new comments. Note also that 234NEXT bears no responsibility for what readers post and is not liable for any form of impersonation.

Reader Comments (17)


Posted by friend on Nov 07 2009

Please understand that since these were rehearsals his dance moves though great were not his best. I think that too many "critics" didn't realize that Michael ALWAYS rehearses this way even when he was at his peak. On Youtube there is video of Michael's Dangerous tour rehearsals. Take a look at them and then really ask yourself did he really miss a beat? I think you'll find them just as "not what he used to be" if you didn't know he ALWAYS gives less in a rehearsal. Michael was at the top of his game in This Is It and he was going to do it!

Posted by Impressed on Nov 07 2009

This is such a beautiful piece. Well done NEXT

Posted by AP on Nov 07 2009

Yeah I agree w/ the 1st post. I've seen video of MJ rehearsing for the Grammys in the 80s and the VMAs in the 90s (good ol' youtube) that looked less impressive than the This Is It footage. MJ new how to "hold back" during rehearsal and then turn it on for the real show. Michael actually said during This Is It that he wasn't singing out to preserve his voice. It would make since that he did the same for his dancing.

Posted by Franc on Nov 07 2009

This review seems confused..as if two different people wrote it..or the writer was battling with himself... to think these rehearsals were the performance defies logic.. and girly man..? To do the kind of dancing he did through out his life you have to be STRONG and FIT...Most 50yr olds could not do 5 minutes of what MJ does... suspected of sleeping with boys? Was that necessary to include in a review of the movie?...Are you capable of doing basic journalistic research? This is the worst written review I have seen ever!

Posted by NOT impressed... on Nov 08 2009

I am confident that it is going to come out in the end that the statement "And all that time, he was also being pumped with a cocktail of drugs" will be a misleading statement. There are lots of places you can go to get information regarding Michael, including his mental state at rehearsals, his insomnia, and also the fact that he was INNOCENT. He still has millions of fans around the world who find his death to be a profound loss. They know that the media has crucified him. MJ always held back at his rehearsals...there are literally thousands of movies right now on YouTube where you can see that, and his fans know that he still had it, even at 50 - he was lord of the dance. His dancers and musicians knew it too. They came from all over the world to work, and to dance with him. Since this was his show, it would make sense that people might "suck up" to him. They wouldn't even be there if it wasn't for him. There will never ever be another Michael Jackson.

Posted by Ryan on Nov 08 2009

Mr Jideonwo, you come across as a jealous person who is bitter about life. What else do you know except trampling others bigger than yourself? Michael Jackson never molested any children, so please get your facts straight. In the film, Michael was only rehearsing his songs and mapping out his dance steps. Even then, his "performance" was already world-class. His legacy as the best entertainer as well as his legacy as the wonderful humanitarian will surely live on forever.

Posted by Lil'd on Nov 08 2009

I agree with one thing, the needless, useless punch lines "cocktail of drugs", "slept with boys", "girly-man" is incredibly disrepetful. I can see that this piece was supposed to be supportive but leave that nonesense out. He was a good person who had his faults like everyone else. A normal person would fail to get out of bad habits as well if they had bad influences around them. Michael unfortunately just had a camera in his face his whole life and obviously was surrounded by untrustworthy people who cared more about his money then his health (ex. his father, Klein). He would never sleep with little boys and the comment is getting tiring. Those who have followed Michael know that he is innocent. Even if you don't follow him but look at all his charity work and his love of the human race and his own kids you can see he was a great Dad and an amazing humanitarian. No he was not built like a weight lifter, but girly man??? Not even close. His movements were sexual and masculine and this is one of many reasons why women would faint when they saw him. If he was a girl-man pretty sure not too many women would be fainting. Michael will be the last great/honest person, humanitarian and artist (in that order) that this world will see for a while. He will be missed and will remain my number one (in many categories) for the rest of my life.

Posted by pleasetruth on Nov 08 2009

Well, medias/critics always say whatever they want to say. But a girl-man is just too ridiculous if you ask anybody who had experience with his live performance. He is innocent and people love him so much just because his love, his caring, much more than anyone else in the world. I can only see the jealousy from these nasty words. It is not "He wanted this badly", rather, you probably should say "some people... AEG... Sony wanted this badly" as this is just not the first time he was asked to give a live performance. For MJ, all he wants is just to give the best, share the love, caring the planet message to everybody. For an artist who is tirelessly trying to give the best to others, please show your respect.

Posted by Disappointed on Nov 08 2009

Your piece was well written, though misguided and as a movie critic myself, I disagree profoundly with your stance here. This write up also came across as though there was too much editing my whom ever finalized it. You wrote about MJ in a way that I would expect a white Western journalist to write and that's not a good thing! This Is It was not meant to be a feature movie but simply a compilation of MJ's rehearsals.

Posted by Kehinde K. on Nov 08 2009

Mr. Franc. It sounds like it was written by two people because it was both respectful and critical??? Gosh Nigerians need to undersome some good journalism. This was an incredibly balanced, tenderly handled piece. I sorry for my people

Posted by SOROS004 on Nov 08 2009

Come on! did you see the Bucharest Concert? That was a 100% Michael. The one that gave everything in the stage. The MJ we saw in "This is It" is fantastic, and as somebody said in another post, he was saving voice and body for the real one. What impressed me the most was the way he talked to his staff,and the warm feelings he shared with everybody even with us, watching the documentary. I have seen many mean "nobodies" (for a close example look at Wall Street) that want to be treated as kings as the treat everybody like the worst. In "This is It" we have a very human pop king that sets a lesson for life: Endurance, perfection, hard working, and that warm feeling that still is chasing me after seeing the movie.

Posted by self on Nov 08 2009

if nothin else, it truly gladens the heart that so many people are on the hero's side. to the reviewer i can only say: dont hate the player, hate the game. MJ is, (despite all evidence to the contrary) only human as he said in his song. the amount of attention even though it was mostly bad press in his case only strenghtens the love of those of us who TRULY appreciate him. the bad press may continue but it only ensures he will live forever. viva MJ

Posted by Worried on Nov 08 2009

I worry when i see people criticise a good piece of work because they dont understand it! This is as balanced as a review about MJ could get. We will never know if MJ slept with boys or not or that he was being pumped full of drugs. Chude only made reference to widely known SUSPICIONS. We all have our secrets, MJ's doent make him less human and death doesnt make a person a saint. Well done Chude!

Posted by daniel on Nov 08 2009

@"worried ",kehinde K and "impressed"" you are all a bunch of nitwits! Yes it has to be said that it is easy for small people like those three and Chude Jidenowo to voice their opinions. But when you take on someone whose little finger accomplished more than you would do(sorry but it is a fact or why are you here writing arsinine copy??) and use insults and uncomplimentary words to cover your incompetence,it annoys me. This was supposed to be a review of the film so where did the child molestation and pumped with drugs feature in the movie? It is simply the reason why government officials slang journalists. You left your primary assignment and start giving us innuendo and unsubstantied allegations as FACT! Just tell us if you liked the movie and why or if you hated it and why? Not that it would matter what you think as most people will still go and see the movie and like it.

Posted by Mickey on Nov 09 2009

@ Ryan: Please read that article again. Mr. Jideonwo did not state that Michael Jackson abused children - he made reference to the speculations of said abuse

Posted by kaylem.t. on Nov 12 2009

i like all your moves michael.



post a comment

Your name: *



* = Required information