Lead Image

Artistic expressions of culture are being stigmatised by the Pentecostals. Photo: ABIODUN OMOTOSO

New religion's siege on old culture

Print print Email email Share Share


Quite some time ago, I watched a B-movie on television in which a mask bought in innocence as a tourist souvenir in Columbia, literarily made life hell for its new owner who lived in a small town in middle-America. At midnight, the mask on the wall got possessed by an evil spirit which transformed it into an animal-shaped monster that went on the rampage in the neighbourhood, committing multiple murders. Then, at the first light of dawn, the monster returned ‘home' to become the quaint, artistic multi-coloured mask on the wall that had initially attracted the owner in Latin America.

Predictably, as the horror drama unfolded, the beautiful decorative mask on the wall did not come into the focus or reckoning of the investigating police officers. But by some quirk of coincidence, a clever unexpected twist in the film plot, the owner was accidentally present in the room when to his amazement and horror the mask was ‘involuntarily' transformed and escaped to perform its programmed evil deeds outdoors. This frightening scene immediately attracted suspicion to the hitherto seemingly harmless mask. Of course, the murder riddle was eventually solved as the mask was virtually caught-in-the-act and ‘sentenced' to death by burning!

On narrating the weird happenings in the film to a friend, a borderline case between atheist and traditional religion advocate, he waxed lyrical about the astral nocturnal powers that enabled objects and humans to fly. Dabbling into the realm of voodoo and witchcraft, he observed that in many parts of Africa, Nigeria included, witches "left their bodies and had the power to fly on broomsticks to attend meetings held on designated trees at dead of night to plan spiritual attacks on unprotected human beings."

For another acquaintance, a dedicated ‘born-again' Pentecostal churchman, the antics of the mask was emphatic proof that it and many like pieces of traditional art were demon-possessed, should be avoided by all means and at best destroyed and put out of circulation.

It is this view towards traditional art, a crusade driven by the self-imposed righteousness of the new religions, particularly the Pentecostal faith, that is currently posing a big danger to the art scene in Nigeria and the survival of traditional and contemporary art, especially sculptural pieces.

Bordering on the ridiculous

Sometimes the righteous attitudes of ardent followers of the ‘new religion' border on the ridiculous. Take the case of artist Tony Akinbola who is doing a wonderful job of creatively rebranding Calabar through indigenous-related monumental art. When he put up his work of huge Ikom monoliths as a monumental tribute to artists who about a century ago demonstrated that they could portray vivid human facial expressions on stone carvings, ironically, members of the same Pentecostal faith he belongs to, saw the huge monoliths as an affront celebrating devil-worship. Soon after the monumental monoliths were put up at a strategic roundabout in Calabar, members of his faith held a prayer session around the monumental art piece "casting and binding the demons" supposedly inhabiting the monoliths.

Like it or not, our new religious faiths and the older churches are all borrowed and adapted from European concepts of religion. What is puzzling and quite worrying about the over zealous righteousness of the preachers and followers of the relatively new Pentecostal faiths in Nigeria is their distorted interpretation of the tenets of the original religion from which they have grown.

Demonising Onobrakpeya

From medieval days in Europe, the Church; particularly the Catholic Church was a huge patron of the arts, commissioning the great artists of the day to do paintings and sculptures to decorate churches across Europe. In fact, the Church and later the noble men and elite were the biggest sponsors of the arts, ensuring their growth and mass acceptance over centuries.

It was therefore not surprising that the Roman Catholic Church in Nigeria commissioned Bruce Onobrakpeya to do artistic works of decoration in a church in Lagos. Predictably, Bruce Onobrakpeya dug into his Urhobo cultural roots and produced works that incorporated traditional Urhobo religious symbols, That the Catholic Church did not regard the religious symbolism in Onobrakpeya's work as pagan or fetish representations says a lot for their artistic and cultural maturity as well as their liberalism. It is the rigidity of the ‘new religion' in Nigeria born out of cultural ignorance and the lack of cultural history that is most disturbing.

According to Bruce Onobrakpeya, the way religious objects are placed in a traditional shrine attest to the artistic inclination of shrine's priest. It is argued in certain artistic circles that the very idea of installations - a phenomenon viewed as avantgarde in western art circles - originated from a study of the placement of objects in traditional African shrines.

It was with a tinge of sadness that Bruce Onobrakpeya narrated some of new experiences he has had with regard to some of his now world-acclaimed artworks. "Once in a while" he told me, "young people return my artworks they have inherited from their parents on the grounds that when their pastor visited their homes and saw the artworks he condemned them as demonic!"

Depressing tale

Strange as it may seem, Onobrakpeya is lucky. Aino Oni-Okpaku - member of the Board of Trustees of the Ben Enwonwu Foundation and a Swedish-born Nigerian art-lover and owner of the Quintessence outfit in Falomo Ikoyi - has depressing stories of how the ‘new religion' has literarily poisoned the minds of Nigerians towards their traditional and contemporary arts. She tells of a collector who had bought an artwork from an exhibition at the Quintessence Gallery and had gone on to prominently display the artwork in his office for pleasure and inspiration. His wife visited his office, saw the artwork, took it away in anger and burnt it because it was demonic,

Recently, Quintessence staged an exhibition of sacred traditional religious art in honour of the late Susanne Wenger. To Aino Oni-Okpaku's amazement, quite a number of people, including some of her workers refused to enter the room where these works were being exhibited on the excuse that they were fetish and demonic.

The new religion in Nigeria in desperation to win more converts has chosen traditional and contemporary Nigerian art as manifestations of devil worship. In truth, their campaign against the arts only exposes their understanding of the reality that creativity is a spiritual manifestation of the Almighty God Himself!

Back
Dear Reader.
While we value your feedback we may block inappropriate comment. Please feel free to respond to new comments. Note also that 234NEXT bears no responsibility for what readers post and is not liable for any form of impersonation.

Reader Comments (8)


Posted by Mudiare Onobrakpeya on Nov 22 2009

The very idea of FESTAC in the mid 70's, was widely condemned by many churches all through out Nigeria, as a return to fetish images, connected to curses and ancestral covenant symbols and paganism by Nigeria. In 30 years since this celebration, the mindset of many about our arts, has not altered drastically. This clearly has put a clog to the widespread appeal and appreciation for the aesthetic qualities of our art, especially the contemporary. The government has therefore approached cultural celebrations using art, as an explosive area, which has to be approached with caution, due to it's potential for undermining political influence and support. Bruce Onobrakpeya a modern Nigerian artist, whose artistic pieces have been widely collected in Christiandom, including by the Vatican Museum, has suffered a high casualty of having a lot of his works burnt, destroyed or at least stiffly resisted, perhaps more than any other Nigerian artist, because of cultural intolerance for new and radical African imagery, connected to the interpretation and worship of God Almighty. This has placed his works directly on the firing line of the brunt of the intolerance of our people, who are often guided by their "inspired" pastors or pious family members. The best of our art, including the modern, will continue to be seen for some time outside Nigerian shores, where they find a safe haven, devoid of any hate, and stand protected for the generality of Nigerians to enjoy their aesthetic merits.

Posted by Naiwu Osahon on Nov 26 2009

Tam, this is very well written stuff. Thank you for it. Even the B movie film you saw on television was not too far from reality and that is the truth about spirituality and not the modern day, money making, fake religions exploiting and poperising their innocent and largely naive followers.

Posted by Nduka Otiono on Nov 26 2009

Tam, this is a remarkable piece. It has inspired me on many fronts and I'll communicate the result to you in due course. The irony in the technological advancement evident in Africa's new modernities in the same breadth as sections of her populace retreat to spiritual primitiveness is astonishing. This is that kind of compelling piece that makes one retort: "I wish I had written it." Thank you.

Posted by Josiah Olubowale on Nov 27 2009

Great piece and Great comments. But have you looked at the connection between these mindsets and the content and structure of education system in Nigeria? There seems to be a profound emphasis on prestige, wealth and profit, rather than knowledge or science. It is now almost unnecessary to give a scientific proof for any assertion in discourse, once that shadow of the "Unknown" who is out to punish fetish is cast.

Posted by Malcom Babatunde Wallace on Nov 28 2009

Once again NEXT provides a forum for critical discourse. This article drew my attention immediately, but unfortunately, the writer "lost me" mid way through the analysis. I have been collecting Nigerian art all through my adult life and have pieces dating as far back as the 1940's. I feel that Icons such as Professors Onobrakpeya, Enwonwu, Grillo etc are getting some well desrved (and overdue) recognition of their incredible talent. My approach to collecting art is unique, i do my best to establish direct contact with the artist (if living) and have extensive chats on the inspiration for the particular work and title. I avoid buying "untitled" works because to me that is like birthing a child and refusing to the give it a name. In my years, i have met artists who are deeply embedded in creating pieces that glorify forms of worship that simply contradict my beliefs as a Christian. I have also seen many cases where traditional shrine pieces have found their way into galleries both here and abroad. I found this partcularly common in many galleries in Paris. However, my European friends are even more excited when they hear these pieces have some links to "mumbo jumbo African stuff". Its the Indiana Jones concept if you wish. But please lets not fool ourselves here. Most of our Grandfathers practiced traditional worhip and the most respected carvers in those days worked closely with the traditional chiefs to carve idols and that they believed served as an intermediary to the spirit world. That is a fact and anyone who disputes that is simply burying their head in the sand like the proverbial ostrich. FACT 2 is that some form of idol worship still exists today and some promoters use "art collection" as an excuse to glofify this form of religion. FACT 3: The question is not if there is a scientific basis that proves if all this fetish stuff works or not, the point is that as Christians, our religion is clear on the display of Idols that represent "gods and thier intermediaries". It is therefore not out of order to get rid of such works once it is confirmed that they represent idols from our darker past. As a Christian, you can not be lukewarm about such things. Thats the fact. By the way i also visited the Quintessence exhibition. NO COMMENT.

Posted by Dayo B on Dec 04 2009

@ Mr. Wallace: you claim that once the art collection is confirmed to represent idols, they should be destroyed. Ok, so who gets to judge and determine that the art works represent idols? Your argument is filled with fallacies. I'm tired of hearing all this "As a Christian excuses" This is exactly the reason why more and more people do deviate from the true message of Christianity. Dont shove your Christian religious views down the throats of others. Live and let live. If someone decides to create art because of his/her belief in some idol, then let it be. It is not the place of other individuals to go about destroying the works of others using the silly "As a Christian" justification. No everyone is a Christian or wishes to be one.

Posted by yucca on Dec 22 2009

If more people could go by this the world would be a better place. I agree with Naiwu and Mr. Dayo B. "You have your thought and I have mine. Your thought advocates Judaism, Brahmanism, Buddhism, Christianity, and Islam. In my thought there is only one universal religion, whose varied paths are but the fingers of the loving hand of the Supreme Being." Khalil Gibran (1983-1931)

Posted by Malcolm B Wallace on Dec 23 2009

@Dayo B: My dear friend, I'm merely expressing my personal views/values as a Christian. It is only natural that those views are in direct conflict with anyone who follows traditional religion. Please do not confuse my explicit expression of what guides ME as an individual as some form of condemnation of what guides YOU. I am speaking for myself as a Christian only; if i wish to "Get rid of" (i never said destroy...you misquoted me) of such forms of art from my home after realising what they represent - whats the issue? I paid for works with my own money and i can do what i choose with them. Have a Merry Christmas...(hope i havent caused offence by mentioning CHRISTmas?)



post a comment

Your name: *



* = Required information